On Jan 2, 2007, at 10:23 AM, Stephan Richter wrote:

On Wednesday 20 December 2006 16:03, Jeff Shell wrote:
zope.fssync

+1

0

It's too bad that this seems to have gone unfinished. The biggest pain
(well, one of the big pains) we experience with Zope 3 is the lack of
anything like Zope 2's export/import. Or, going further back,
'manage_exportHack'. :). This is a side topic and I'm not going to
elaborate further except to beg for some low to medium level
export/import capability. It seems that fssync was one of the
alternatives, or could be, if I recall correctly.

The question is why you need it. zope.fssync was originally developed for TTW
development via the filesystem. I think this use case has gone away.

Certainly TTW development has a much smaller future than once envisioned,
but it is still done to some degree.

What use
cases do *you* have for using fssync?

I think fssync would be very useful for content management. I'd love to be able to use fssync to manage a wiki (or other collection of documents) offline.

Of course, there is the use case that Jeff mentioned, which is export/ import.

I don't think a whole lot is needed to make fssync a reality:

1. Cure any bitrot that has set in. It would also ne nice to replace existing
    tests with modern doctests.

2. Provide a Python API. fssync originally had a Python API, but this was replaced with a web-based API. I think there should be both a Python API that wasn't encumbered in any way by security, and a protected web-based API. The Python API should really be Zope and even ZODB independent. I don't think this would be a lot of work. The original one wasn't and would
    be useful in many cases.

3. I think there should be a secure web-based interface. This will require:

- Adding security checks that the user is allowed to access serialization
      and de-serialization adapters,

    - Adding security declarations for these adapters,

I don't think any of these would require a great deal of work.

Sadly, I won't be able to work on fssync any time soon, but I'd be willing to provide some high-level advice and oversight if someone else was able and interested
in working on it.

Jim

--
Jim Fulton                      mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]                Python 
Powered!
CTO                             (540) 361-1714                  
http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation        http://www.zope.com             http://www.zope.org



_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to