On Apr 6, 2005, at 6:59, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On Dienstag, 5. April 2005 16:38 Uhr -0400 Jake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And that is probably the best arguement for keeping them around longer.
We should get to the point: if some people depend on ZClasses then they should
take over some responsibility in maintaining them in future releases. It can not be
that a "feature" regarded as obsolete (from the majority) and almost unmaintained and
untouched since ages holds up further releases.
Amen. Actually, instead of maintaining them in the core the current users should immediately look at breaking it out of the core into a separate product, as suggested earlier, and maintain that product. I believe that would make it simpler both from a Zope maintainer perspective as well as from the ZClass maintainers' perspective.
jens
_______________________________________________
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
