--On Dienstag, 5. April 2005 16:38 Uhr -0400 Jake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

And that is probably the best arguement for keeping them around longer.

We should get to the point: if some people depend on ZClasses then they should
take over some responsibility in maintaining them in future releases. It can not be
that a "feature" regarded as obsolete (from the majority) and almost unmaintained and
untouched since ages holds up further releases. I agree with Jim that they should be
officially deprecated - means they could be removed in Zope 2.10. We could leave them
longer if they should work in further releases without further work. If there are serious
problems in further releases with ZClasses holding up a new release we should kick them.
So if you depend on ZClasses....learn how they are implemented and maintain them in the
future. But from the prospective of limited resource it is not reasonable to spend much
time on ZClasses in the future.


-aj





Attachment: pgpe8HOYVqLUR.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )

Reply via email to