On 6/24/06, Andrew Sawyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There would be VERY limited things an individual could upload. I
personally argued strongly for 0 membership on this site. If the ideas
of micro sites went forward, the appropriate micro sites could allow (or
not) membership as necessary.
[...]
> Who will decides which content is worth migration?
For the site I refer to, only that which meets the scope of the site.
-MAXINT from me. You are trying to make a top run "managed" site. I
think that is wrong for a collaborative software project by principle,
and it also means that ZF will have to pay sometbdy to create content
on the site, which to me seems to be a complete waste of money, when
reasonably the community members should do that themselves.
--
Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/
CPS Content Management http://www.cps-project.org/
_______________________________________________
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
