--On 25. Juni 2006 08:32:54 +0200 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/24/06, Andrew Sawyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:There would be VERY limited things an individual could upload. I personally argued strongly for 0 membership on this site. If the ideas of micro sites went forward, the appropriate micro sites could allow (or not) membership as necessary.[...]> Who will decides which content is worth migration? For the site I refer to, only that which meets the scope of the site.-MAXINT from me. You are trying to make a top run "managed" site. I think that is wrong for a collaborative software project by principle, and it also means that ZF will have to pay sometbdy to create content on the site, which to me seems to be a complete waste of money, when reasonably the community members should do that themselves.
I second the proposal to work with micro sites. A decoupled number of micro sites have the advantage to be less dependent on all other components which results in a better manageability. In addition the migration to micro sites can be done as ppl have resources. Ripping out a particular part of zope.org
(e.g. the collectors). would not much interfere with the existing site. -aj
pgpTIU8TwZ9qG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
