----- Original Message -----
From: "David H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jonathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <zope@zope.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 3:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope] Trying to trap ConflictError
Jonathan wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jonathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Dennis Allison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <zope@zope.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope] Trying to trap ConflictError
Jonathan wrote at 2006-7-4 13:46 -0400:
...
The image objects stored in
TemporaryStorage are never overwritten, edited etc (which is causing me
some
confusion as to why the conflict errors are occurring)
The error message tells your that the conflict is not caused by
the modification of the image but the container holding your image.
"BTreeFolder" already do conflict resolution -- and reduce the
conflict probability by about a factor of 30 to 100 (depending on type).
However, if several threads should try to add elements with the same
id, then the conflict resolution cannot work.
Maybe, that happens in your case?
The id for the image object is generated by the following code:
def MakeId():
time.sleep(.01)
ts = string.replace(str(time.time()),'.', '') # remove floating point
'.' char
return ts[-10:]
So there should not be any collision of ids.
I am still investing, and have found errors like:
Jonathan,
I wouldn't feel safe with that. Why not append a few random digits just
to be safe?
I am relatively new to python, so if there is something problematic with my
use of the time module to create unique ids, please let me know! (just
adding random digits seems a bit kludgy?!)
Thanks,
Jonathan
_______________________________________________
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )