It is amazing how you keep digging up additional mandates for the
OpenBSD project!

Brilliant work.

I'm wondering if you have an view on our UFO research?


Justina Colmena ~biz <just...@colmena.biz> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> On May 15, 2020 3:04:06 AM AKDT, jeanfrancois <jfsimon1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Justine,
> >
> >No one except a few people probably make OpenBSD so you won't
> >find what you expect here, except what you put in if we can say so.
> There is too much "help" out there, and no enterprise to speak of. The risk 
> of criminal prosecution is too high, people are dealing drugs on OpenBSD, and 
> the cops are cracking down, but it sure ain't the dealers taking the fall for 
> the drugs in any court of law. It's us "users" who haven't paid our dues for 
> "protection" from the usual extortion rackets in town, not that we actually 
> made a "choice" of our own free will to do anything illegal.
> 
> >
> >So it depends upon if you find it worthwhile to investigate.
> >
> >I deeply think OpenBSD needs to remain small that's all, but it's free
> A small trusted (audited) code base is great: lean and mean is definitely the 
> right spirit, but some of the underlying hardware and the interfaces to 
> connect to it are getting out of hand. It's  undocumented, or poorly 
> documented, subject to NDA and exclusive agreements with SCO and MSFT.
> 
> I would need to get basic laptop hardware recognized and booted properly 
> before I'm SWATted, trespassed off the property, arrested, and end up having 
> all my computer equipment confiscated by corrupt thin-blue-line-flag cops on 
> the take.
> 
> No I'm not blaming OpenBSD, don't take it that way. It's the Chaos Computer 
> Club, the Cult of the Dead Cow, and similar groups who have gotten into the 
> U.S. government and gained the ability to file and prosecute arbitrary 
> criminal charges against Targeted Individuals.
> 
> >you can use it if you like, and even create projects and then let us
> >know about it.
> Nice. I can "use" it, "responsibly," I presume. I'm not a "hacker" and I'm 
> not breaking any laws and I'm not taking anyone's paid job away by using open 
> source.
> >
> >That's what advocacy also is for.
> Well I probably do need an attorney to defend myself against all the civil 
> and criminal allegations from the SCO team et alia, or I would, except all 
> those attorneys are on Facebook and Twitter, they use Microsoft Windows in 
> the office, and they're in trouble with the bar because they're all THIEVES 
> IN LAW (воры в законе) hard at work stealing money, confiscating property, 
> and REVOKING basic human rights and dignities "on vice" for life without 
> recourse.
> 
> Sorry for the rant, but somehow we've got to get a grip on serious organized 
> crime, somehow grab those guys by their scruffy white collars or dirty blue 
> collars or whatever is the requisite clothing for their chosen profession or 
> vocation, haul *them* into their own court system, make *them* face the 
> charges for their crimes, rather than allowing them to live a life of crime 
> and use their court system as a tool against us.
> 
> -- 
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
> 

Reply via email to