The Baha'i Studies Listserv

Stephen, I guess if society wants to base its mores on the standards of a 
religion that makes up 0.1% of the world's population, that would be their 
choice. No one would more surprised than we if they based their mores on our 
standards without first embracing from the heart our scriptures and covenant. 
They won't. 

If we wanted to impose our standards on them, we would initiate an 
international political party dedicated to seizing political power all over the 
world. We don't.

If you walk into a Baha'i meeting anywhere, you would probably find very little 
discussion of the issues you have mentioned. We rarely involve the experts from 
wikipedia in our consultations. This is a religion based on studying and 
practicing the writings of Baha'u'llah, not on injecting clever puritanical 
solutions into the political passions du jour.

GS



-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Kent Gray <skg_z...@yahoo.com>
To: Baha'i Studies <bahai-st@list.jccc.edu>
Sent: Wed, Apr 17, 2013 12:50 pm
Subject: Re: Against nature...


                
        
The Baha'i Studies Listserv

Many cultures attempt to codify their prescriptions concerning individual 
sexual behaviors. Such codifications are frequently enacted as laws, extending 
their application beyond the culture to other cultures under the purview of the 
laws, including dissenters.
Most of the Islamic world has strict rules enforced with sometimes violent 
punishments to enforce Islamic moral codes, including sexual morality on their 
citizens, and impose it on non-Muslims living within their societies. The same 
was true of various European Christian regimes at some stages in history, and 
some contemporary Christians support restrictions on the private expression of 
sexuality outside of marriage, ranging from prohibitions of prostitution to 
restrictions on oral sex and sodomy.
The Wikipedia links is below, but why would society base it's mores on the 
standards of a religion that makes up 0.1% of the world's population?
Susan, while conservatives tend to make claims like that all the time, no 
actual evidence has shown that to be true. Instead, two parent households 
regardless of gender is the ideal home according to the data. Interpreting the 
data any other way is a non sequitur.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_and_sexuality


Sent from my iPad

On Apr 17, 2013, at 13:51, Susan Maneck <sman...@gmail.com> wrote:



                
        
The Baha'i Studies Listserv





Susan, have you read the earlier e-mail in this thread. Don C thinks society 
should have a zero tolerance policy towards non-heterosexuality. No marriage, 
no civil unions, no domestic partnership, no adoption, no parental rights, etc. 
He was complaining society gives them too many rights and blames it on secular 
liberalism. 



I'm sorry, but I read all of Don's posts and I didn't read a single one which 
stated that gays should have no legal rights or be afforded any tolerance. That 
would be diametrically opposed to our own NSAs recent letter on this issue.  
But I'll let him say for himself whether he thinks you have accurately 
represented his views. But please show me exactly where Don said that a gay 
parent should lose all of their parental rights? As far as 'adoption' goes, I 
don't think there is any such thing as a 'right' to adoption. Adoptions should 
be for the benefit of the child, period. And I would agree with Don that 
children are better off with a mother and a father. But there are cases, 
especially with hard-to-place children, where a single parent or homosexual 
couple might be the best alternative to foster care. For instance, I know of 
one gay couple that adopted a five African-American siblings. No way would 
those kids have been kept together under any other circumstance. In that case, 
keeping the brothers and sisters  together ought to take precedence over not 
providing them with both a mother and a father. . 



 

__________________________________________________
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:arch...@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to 
mailto:leave-697604-27401.54f46e81b66496c9909bcdc2f7987...@list.jccc.edu
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to ly...@list.jccc.edu
Or subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News (on-campus only) - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Reply via email to