On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:44, Élie Charest wrote:
> Le 29 Octobre 2003 22:49, Con Kolivas a écrit :
> > Hi all
> >
> > A couple of years
> > ago when I was subscribed to this list I suggested renicing X by default
> > to -10 and noticed that it was done on the following release by default.
> > That was a recommendation based on the default kernel's scheduler
> > inability to make X smooth enough under load.
> > However I am going to have to recommend reversing that change now as the
> > new kernel has been tuned to allow good performance of X at nice 0. The
> > new O(1) scheduler is far more aggressive with treatment of priorities
> > and has much larger timeslices. Giving X a priority of -10 will make it
> > cause unnecessary scheduling latencies for tasks that use even small
> > amounts of cpu such as audio playback. In a nutshell this means that
> > renicing X will make audio skip with a 2.6 kernel on even modern
> > hardware.
>
> Very astute observation. I was wondering why the gain in responsiveness
> wasn't as noticeable as I'd hoped... :-)
>
> Where do I set X's nice default level again? It's been a while.

mandrake 9.2 does it here:
/etc/X11/xdm/Xservers

and removing the nice -10 part of the command should be enough.

> While we're on kernel 2.6, I've noticed something with the test releases:
> whenever I try to install 2.6 through the contrib RPMs (test5, then test8)
> I can never get NVIDIA to compile and install (using the method from
> www.minion.de). Actually the module will compile but not load. However,
> when I compile test9 from kernel.org and try it, I can install the nvidia
> driver fine. Somehow there's a setting in the 2.6 rpms from Mandrake that
> seems to cause a problem with the nvidia drivers.

You need the kernel source of the  kernel you want the drivers compiled for. 
By default it looks for the kernel in /usr/src/linux so I usually symlink 
that to my latest kernel build directory.

> By the way, adding in the supermount patch for test8 to test9 seems to work
> fine - in fact, I haven't had any troubles except for my usb scanner not
> being detected at all.

Chances are you're not loading the usb module correctly (some have changed 
names) or you're not mounting the new usbfs. Put this into your /etc/fstab :

none /proc/bus/usb usbfs defaults 0 0

Cheers,
Con


Reply via email to