I would say i agree with the plans of not focusing on wine-devel. I think it would be a shame not to ship wine-6.0 as the stable version tho.
Sveinar Søpler ----- On Feb 7, 2021, at 10:34 PM, Berillions berilli...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi, > > No objection but why do not ship Wine-6.0 as stable version for > Bullseye instead of 5.0 ? > Because as Phil explained in another mail, wine-6.0 release date is > after the 1st freeze date ? > > Sorry for these questions, it's new for me. > But it would be a shame to have an old stable version in Bullseye. > > If there are no inconveniences to push wine-6.0 into > bullseye-backports when available. > > Cordially, > Max > > > Le dim. 7 févr. 2021 à 21:48, Michael Gilbert <mgilb...@debian.org> a écrit : >> >> Given some of the discussion on this list recently, it seems there is >> a need for plans to be clarified. >> >> My intent is for wine-development to no longer ship in stable >> releases. I don't see the value of a mid-cycle version of wine to be >> in debian stable any more. It made sense when the time between wine >> stable releases was very long, but that is no more. In conclusion, >> there is no objective to get wine-development ready in time for the >> freeze. >> >> Also, the plan is to ship wine 5 as the stable version of wine for >> bullseye. Work on wine 6 will pick up after the freeze. >> >> Best wishes, >> Mike
