> On 18 Mar 2016, at 22:24, Marcelo Vanzin <van...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 2:12 PM, chrismattmann <mattm...@apache.org> wrote: >> So, my comment here is that any code *cannot* be removed from an Apache >> project if there is a VETO issued which so far I haven't seen, though maybe >> Marcelo can clarify that. > > No, my intention was not to veto the change. I'm actually for the > removal of components if the community thinks they don't add much to > the project. (I'm also not sure I can even veto things, not being a > PMC member.) > > I mainly wanted to know what was the path forward for those components > because, with Cloudera's hat on, we care about one of them (streaming > integration with flume), and we'd prefer if that code remained under > the ASF umbrella in some way. >
I'd be supportive of a spark-extras project; it'd actually be place to keep stuff I've worked on -the yarn ATS 1/1.5 integration -that mutant hive JAR which has the consistent kryo dependency and different shadings ... etc There's also the fact that the twitter streaming is a common example to play with, flume is popular in places too. If you want to set up a new incubator with a goal of graduating fast, I'd help. As a key metric of getting out of incubator is active development, you just need to "recruit" contributors and keep them engaged. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
