Are you talking about group/identifier name, or contained classes? Because there are plenty of org.apache.* classes distributed via maven with non-apache group / identifiers.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 6:54 PM, David Nalley <ke4...@apache.org> wrote: > >> As far as group / artifact name compatibility, at least in the case of >> Kafka we need different artifact names anyway, and people are going to >> have to make changes to their build files for spark 2.0 anyway. As >> far as keeping the actual classes in org.apache.spark to not break >> code despite the group name being different, I don't know whether that >> would be enforced by maven central, just looked at as poor taste, or >> ASF suing for trademark violation :) > > > Sonatype, has strict instructions to only permit org.apache.* to originate > from repository.apache.org. Exceptions to that must be approved by VP, > Infrastructure. > ------ > Sent via Pony Mail for dev@spark.apache.org. > View this email online at: > https://pony-poc.apache.org/list.html?dev@spark.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
