I think a vote here would be good. I think most of the discussion was done by 4
or 5 people and its a long thread. If nothing else it summarizes everything
and gets people attention to the change.
Tom
On Thursday, March 9, 2017 10:55 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote:
I think a VOTE is over-thinking it, and is rarely used, but, can't hurt. Nah,
anyone can call a vote. This really isn't that formal. We just want to declare
and document consensus.
I think SPIP is just a remix of existing process anyway, and don't think it
will actually do much anyway, which is why I am sanguine about the whole thing.
To bring this to a conclusion, I will just put the contents of the doc in an
email tomorrow for a VOTE. Raise any objections now.
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 3:39 PM Cody Koeninger <c...@koeninger.org> wrote:
I started this idea as a fork with a merge-able change to docs.
Reynold moved it to his google doc, and has suggested during this
email thread that a vote should occur.
If a vote needs to occur, I can't see anything on
http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html suggesting that I can call
for a vote, which is why I'm asking PMC members to do it since they're
the ones who would vote anyway.
Now Sean is saying this is a code/doc change that can just be reviewed
and merged as usual...which is what I tried to do to begin with.
The fact that you haven't agreed on a process to agree on your process
is, I think, an indication that the process really does need
improvement ;)
