This ended up proceeding as a normal doc change, instead of precipitating a meta-vote. However, the text that's on the web site now can certainly be further amended if anyone wants to propose a change from here.
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 1:50 PM Tom Graves <tgraves...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I think a vote here would be good. I think most of the discussion was done > by 4 or 5 people and its a long thread. If nothing else it summarizes > everything and gets people attention to the change. > > Tom > > > On Thursday, March 9, 2017 10:55 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > I think a VOTE is over-thinking it, and is rarely used, but, can't hurt. > Nah, anyone can call a vote. This really isn't that formal. We just want to > declare and document consensus. > > I think SPIP is just a remix of existing process anyway, and don't think > it will actually do much anyway, which is why I am sanguine about the whole > thing. > > To bring this to a conclusion, I will just put the contents of the doc in > an email tomorrow for a VOTE. Raise any objections now. > > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 3:39 PM Cody Koeninger <c...@koeninger.org> wrote: > > I started this idea as a fork with a merge-able change to docs. > Reynold moved it to his google doc, and has suggested during this > email thread that a vote should occur. > If a vote needs to occur, I can't see anything on > http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html suggesting that I can call > for a vote, which is why I'm asking PMC members to do it since they're > the ones who would vote anyway. > Now Sean is saying this is a code/doc change that can just be reviewed > and merged as usual...which is what I tried to do to begin with. > > The fact that you haven't agreed on a process to agree on your process > is, I think, an indication that the process really does need > improvement ;) > > > >
