> In principle, this makes perfect sense. It'll be easy if > you've split > the MyFaces jars into api and impl classes (like the RI > does), because > then it's just a matter of setting up your own > build.properties file and > defining "jsf-api.jar" and "jsf-impl.jar" appropriately.
no, not now. but i mean also the use of myfaces in the examples. so it would be much easier for users, since JSF (myfaces) is delivered directly for running the WAR-files. matthias > I'll look into seeing if that actually works, once I've caught up and > made sure that struts-faces works with the current version of the RI > (the code I'm most familiar with). But that has to wait until I do > penance for being offline for a couple of months, by taking a > whack at > our failing cookie-related Cactus tests :-). > > >cheers, > >matthias > > > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > > > > > > >>On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 18:56:41 -0700, Craig McClanahan > >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Ted Husted wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>I imagine Craig has Struts-Faces compiling against 2.4 to > >>>> > >>>> > >>make sure > >> > >> > >>>>it stays in synch with Tomcat 5. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>It is indeed, but that's actually a mistake. It needs to compile > >>>against the 2.3 version, since that's what JSF specifies as > >>> > >>> > >>a minimum > >> > >> > >>>platform. I'll fix that in tonight's run. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>But, the question is whether we want to mandate that > >>>> > >>>> > >>Struts-Faces can > >> > >> > >>>>only compile against 2.3 (and not 2.4)? Or vice-versa. Or > >>>> > >>>> > >>is there a > >> > >> > >>>>way to write the class so it compiles under either? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>I'll take a look at the changes once I catch up a little > >>> > >>> > >>bit more, and > >> > >> > >>>might be able to come up with something clever that makes this > >>>possible (still recovering from JavaOne and ~11k backlogged mail > >>>messages :-). > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>I know this is a pain. We went through the same problem with > >>>>DataSources between 2.2 and 2.3. I'm not sure what the > >>>> > >>>> > >>issue here is, > >> > >> > >>>>but for DataSources, the interface changed and we had to > >>>> > >>>> > >>stub the new > >> > >> > >>>>members so that they threw exceptions if called. Of course, the > >>>>problem with that approach is it may obviate new functionality or > >>>>rely on deprecated methods. > >>>> > >>>>-Ted. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>Craig > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 14:14:02 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>James, > >>>>> > >>>>>i also guess it is the result of the commitment. > >>>>>i submitted (first) a wrapper, that builds against 2.4 reason is, > >>>>>the build-porperties had *default* to 2.4 > >>>>> > >>>>>okay ted asks for a 2.3-wrapper, so i created that candidate. > >>>>> > >>>>>i think the wrapper should compile against 2.3 > >>>>>since jsf is able to run in j2ee1.3-containers > >>>>> > >>>>>So i am wondering, why struts-faces uses 2.4 > >>>>>for compiling. > >>>>> > >>>>>btw. the 2.3 wrapper runs on servlet2.4-containers (like > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>tomcat5.0) > >> > >> > >>>>>Matthias > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>I think it is happening because of the changes I > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>committed for your > >> > >> > >>>>>>fix for MyFaces. If you look at when the builds stopped, it's > >>>>>>right after I made the commits on 6/29. It must be an issue of > >>>>>>what version of servlet.jar that the HttpServletRequestWrapper > >>>>>>class is being compiled against. Is it not possible to > make that > >>>>>>class compilable against both 2.3 and 2.4? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>-James > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>-----Original Message----- > >>>>>>From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>wessendorf.de] > >> > >> > >>>>>>Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 6:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>Subject: Struts-faces > >>>>>> > >>>>>>see http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/nightly/struts- > >>>>>>faces/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>the nightly build is empty again, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>so is there a logfile, where i can check, why it is not build > >>>>>>successful? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Cheers, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>-- > >>>>>>Matthias Weßendorf > >>>>>>Aechterhoek 18 > >>>>>>DE-48282 Emsdetten > >>>>>>Germany > >>>>>>Email: matthias AT wessendorf DOT net > >>>>>>URL: http://www.wessendorf.net > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>--------------------------------------------------------- > --------- > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>--- To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] For > >> > >> > >>>>>>additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>--------------------------------------------------------- > --------- > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>--- To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] For > >> > >> > >>>>>>additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>---------------------------------------------------------- > ---------- > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > >>>>>additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>----------------------------------------------------------- > ---------- > >>> > >>> > >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > >>>>additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>------------------------------------------------------------ > --------- > >> > >> > >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > >>>additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>------------------------------------------------------------ > --------- > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >> > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]