Michael,
> I looked and maven is pulling servlet 2.2. I would assume > that faces is using that same servlet.jar. I just rebuilt > faces against 2.3 and the problems seem to have gone away. I > haven't tried 2.4, but it seems that it should work fine > there. It is my guess after trying to build struts-faces in > eclipse using servlet 2.2 that the problem is with 2.2 not > being supported. (And it shouldn't be right?) Michael yes in 2.4 the interface for httpServletRequest has new methods. so i thinks it is better to compile this lib against 2.3 and struts against 2.2 ? jsf requires 2.3 however, after building struts-faces successful whats against using myfaces directly in struts-faces? now the user must load all jars form sun for using struts-faces integration-lib cheers, matthias > On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 18:56:41 -0700, Craig McClanahan > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ted Husted wrote: > > > > >I imagine Craig has Struts-Faces compiling against 2.4 to > make sure > > >it stays in synch with Tomcat 5. > > > > > > > > > > > It is indeed, but that's actually a mistake. It needs to compile > > against the 2.3 version, since that's what JSF specifies as > a minimum > > platform. I'll fix that in tonight's run. > > > > >But, the question is whether we want to mandate that > Struts-Faces can > > >only compile against 2.3 (and not 2.4)? Or vice-versa. Or > is there a > > >way to write the class so it compiles under either? > > > > > > > > > > > I'll take a look at the changes once I catch up a little > bit more, and > > might be able to come up with something clever that makes this > > possible (still recovering from JavaOne and ~11k backlogged mail > > messages :-). > > > > >I know this is a pain. We went through the same problem with > > >DataSources between 2.2 and 2.3. I'm not sure what the > issue here is, > > >but for DataSources, the interface changed and we had to > stub the new > > >members so that they threw exceptions if called. Of course, the > > >problem with that approach is it may obviate new functionality or > > >rely on deprecated methods. > > > > > >-Ted. > > > > > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > > > >On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 14:14:02 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > > > > > > > >>James, > > >> > > >>i also guess it is the result of the commitment. > > >>i submitted (first) a wrapper, that builds against 2.4 reason is, > > >>the build-porperties had *default* to 2.4 > > >> > > >>okay ted asks for a 2.3-wrapper, so i created that candidate. > > >> > > >>i think the wrapper should compile against 2.3 > > >>since jsf is able to run in j2ee1.3-containers > > >> > > >>So i am wondering, why struts-faces uses 2.4 > > >>for compiling. > > >> > > >>btw. the 2.3 wrapper runs on servlet2.4-containers (like > tomcat5.0) > > >> > > >>Matthias > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>I think it is happening because of the changes I > committed for your > > >>>fix for MyFaces. If you look at when the builds stopped, it's > > >>>right after I made the commits on 6/29. It must be an issue of > > >>>what version of servlet.jar that the HttpServletRequestWrapper > > >>>class is being compiled against. Is it not possible to make that > > >>>class compilable against both 2.3 and 2.4? > > >>> > > >>>-James > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>-----Original Message----- > > >>>From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wessendorf.de] > > >>>Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 6:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>>Subject: Struts-faces > > >>> > > >>>see http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/nightly/struts- > > >>>faces/ > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>the nightly build is empty again, > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>so is there a logfile, where i can check, why it is not build > > >>>successful? > > >>> > > >>>Cheers, > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>-- > > >>>Matthias Weßendorf > > >>>Aechterhoek 18 > > >>>DE-48282 Emsdetten > > >>>Germany > > >>>Email: matthias AT wessendorf DOT net > > >>>URL: http://www.wessendorf.net > > >>> > > >>> > > > >>>------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >>>--- To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > > >>>additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>> > > >>> > > > >>>------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >>>--- To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > > >>>additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>> > > >>> > > > >>-------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > > >>additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > > >additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
