Yes Ted you are right. michael patched it via http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29448 there was also a disscussion on the dev-list.
my wrapper is also using HttpServletRequest of servlet-2.3, but nightly-builds are empty. so now i am on the point of my first mail (this thread) :-) regards, Matthias > -----Original Message----- > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 7:03 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: RE: Struts-faces > > > I believe that Michael Rasmussen submitted a patch so that > Struts Faces would compile with 1.2.x, and it also required > Servlet 2.3 only. > > -Ted. > > On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 17:39:38 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > i think it will be better (perhaps for now) > > to compile against servlet 2.3 > > > > jsf-deployment-guide tells people howto run jsf (the RI) in 1.3 or > > 1.4-j2ee-containers. > > > > so if struts-faces is build against 2.4 > > people run into problems, when they *must* > > use 1.3-webcontainer (e.g. tomcat) > > > > on my box struts-faces from cvs (incl. patch for 2.3) runs > in tomcat5 > > with RI and MyFaces. > > > > so, i don't know the complexity of changing > > on nightly-build-box the dependency from 2.4 > > to 2.3 > > > > btw. there is another dependency in struts-faces > > it builds against struts1.1 > > with 1.2 there is a problem too... (it is a known issue) > > FormComponent.java has a problem with method > > "createDynaActionFormClass()" of class "DynaActionFormClass" > > > > Matthias > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 5:17 PM > >> To: Struts Developers List > >> Subject: RE: Struts-faces > >> > >> > >> I imagine Craig has Struts-Faces compiling against 2.4 to > make sure > >> it stays in synch with Tomcat 5. > >> > >> But, the question is whether we want to mandate that > Struts-Faces can > >> only compile against 2.3 (and not 2.4)? Or vice-versa. Or > is there a > >> way to write the class so it compiles under either? > >> > >> I know this is a pain. We went through the same problem with > >> DataSources between 2.2 and 2.3. I'm not sure what the > issue here is, > >> but for DataSources, the interface changed and we had to > stub the new > >> members so that they threw exceptions if called. Of course, the > >> problem with that approach is it may obviate new functionality or > >> rely on deprecated methods. > >> > >> -Ted. > >> > >> > >> On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 14:14:02 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > >> > >>> James, > >>> > >>> > >>> i also guess it is the result of the commitment. i submitted > >>> (first) a wrapper, that builds against 2.4 > >>> > >> reason is, the > >>> build-porperties had *default* to 2.4 > >>> > >>> > >>> okay ted asks for a 2.3-wrapper, so i created that candidate. > >>> > >>> > >>> i think the wrapper should compile against 2.3 > >>> since jsf is able to run in j2ee1.3-containers > >>> > >>> > >>> So i am wondering, why struts-faces uses 2.4 > >>> for compiling. > >>> > >>> > >>> btw. the 2.3 wrapper runs on servlet2.4-containers (like > >>> tomcat5.0) > >>> > >>> > >>> Matthias > >>> > >>> > >>>> I think it is happening because of the changes I committed > >>>> > >> for your > >>>> fix for MyFaces. If you look at when the builds stopped, > >>>> > >> it's right > >>>> after I made the commits on 6/29. It must be an issue of what > >>>> version of servlet.jar that the > HttpServletRequestWrapper class is > >>>> being compiled against. Is it not possible to make that class > >>>> compilable against both 2.3 and 2.4? > >>>> > >>>> -James > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> > >> wessendorf.de] > >>>> Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 6:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> Subject: Struts-faces > >>>> > >>>> see http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta- > >>>> struts/nightly/struts- faces/ > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> the nightly build is empty again, > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> so is there a logfile, where i can check, why it is not build > >>>> successful? > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Matthias Weßendorf > >>>> Aechterhoek 18 > >>>> DE-48282 Emsdetten > >>>> Germany > >>>> Email: matthias AT wessendorf DOT net > >>>> URL: http://www.wessendorf.net > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> ---- --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> For additional commands, e- > >>>> mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> ---- --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> For additional commands, e- > >>>> mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> ---- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > >> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]