On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@gnome.org> 
> wrote:
>> My $0.02 is that none of the reasons we requested the blocker criterion
>> have changed. Dual boot with macOS is very important to attracting new
>> users -- we're explicitly targeting macOS users, that's the user group
>> where we think we have real potential for significant growth -- and I
>> continue to prefer we block the release indefinitely if it's not
>> working. We can't afford for our next Ars review to say "the installer
>> is broken, try again next year."
>
> Then we, as a project, need to back that up with sufficient hardware
> and test resources.  Otherwise it is nothing more than a wish and will
> continue to lead to problems like this.

And multi boot issues, which can be quite complex and nuanced, should
then I believe also be a beta blocker (or at least well tested in the
lead up to beta) to ensure issues get enough attention early enough in
the release so as to not block GA.

Peter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to