Thanks Juergen , 100 % agree 73 de LA5VNA Steinar
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "dl8le" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Per definition the > > DIGITALRADIO GROUP > > is > > > "A meeting place for discussion of amateur radio digital modes, > applications, software, hardware, equipment, and on the air > activity." > > The ongoing discussion about legal or formal topics since a couple > of weeks with constant repeating of all the old arguments without > any new ideas or aspects is more than boring and for sure not in > line with the original definition. It's just repeating something and > no interest in carefully considering the other party's arguments. > And, worst of all, only one part of the different subjects of this > group, the air activity if this term can be applied at all, is > discussed over and over again with absolutely no progress. Please > count the posts on FCC regulations, fundamental (and unfortunately > non-technical) contributions to emergency communication in > particular the spending of 250 KUSD for radio equipment etc (I don't > want to waste my time to list all what I have read in the past weeks > since I joined this group), and then compare that number to the > posts on real topics of this group. The ratio between the two > figures is in my opinion completely inadequate. > > I like open discussions but there should be an end sometime, at > least that the different parties come to the conclusion that there > will be no agreement. That is at least an agreement. > > If the present discussions will continue I will for sure leave this > group. The group will survive it, of course, but I wonder if not > many others not commenting in public will look for a better > alternative to the meeting place the Digitalradio Group is offering > at the moment. > > 73 > > Juergen, DL8LE >
