I recommend that they move even higher in the 140-150 segment, PSK runs around 141 to 143, RTTY 142 to 145 so I guess if they want to be "nice" they could even move higher, what caused them to move down the band?
Ron W4LDE Sholto Fisher wrote: > Hi all, > > I am in communication with Ev, W2EV with regards to the current PropNet > JT65 contention issue and he has asked what my proposal would be > regarding frequency coordination. > > PropNet and JT65 both require international potential so this means they > both need to be in the small region of 10.140 - 10.150 MHz (carrier). > > Currently the frequencies are:- > > From http://www.propnet.org/frequency_grid.html > 10.138.9 (USB vfo) with offsets from 1300Hz to 1600Hz depending on > geographical location. > > From http://hflink.com/jt65/ the JT65 frequency is: > > "The JT65A frequency 30metres is 10139.0 kHz USB VFO" > > JT65 has a suggested audio frequency center of 1360Hz with the sync tone > being at 1270 (approx) and the upper edge is around 1450Hz. > > I am aware that the area from 10.140 (carrier) to approximately 10.140.2 > (carrier) is utilized by the QRSS folks and they would probably not like > anything moving down into their segment. > > Does anyone in the 30MDG or Digital Radio group have an opinion on where > PropNet could find a home on 30m without causing a problem? > > I am thinking they either need to go back to where they were or move up > to something like 10.141.2 (USB vfo). But would this impact PSK31 DX? > > I know the PropNet vs JT65 thing is not at the top of many people's list > but it's making JT65 impossible on 30m right now. > > 73, Sholto > KE7HPV. > > > Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at > http://www.obriensweb.com/sked > > Check our other Yahoo Groups.... > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/ > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > >
