Andy, I am ok with this idea too but we have to start somewhere.
Ev is being extremely cooperative in looking for a solution/compromise and I have posted a message to the WSJT group asking for their help too. But I am seeing most JT65 and JT2 etc still using the 10.139 frequency so thought maybe it was easier to see how flexible PropNet was and bearing in mind they are the ones who recently moved down. 73, Sholto KE7HPV. Andrew O'Brien wrote: > How about moving the JT65 stations, the freq was simply one suggested > by Bonnie, nothing cast in stone. > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Joe Veldhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> That would probably QRM the HF APRS channel, which is around 10.1495 >> (10.1515 LSB, 2100-2300 Hz AF). >> >> Unfortunately, it's almost impossible to do any kind of frequency >> coordination on 30m. It's been my experience that there isn't one single Hz >> of bandwidth that is not occupied by CW, gigawatt RTTY stations, beacons, >> winlids, or other operation. >> >> -Joe, N8FQ >> >> >> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:55:46 -0600 >> John Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > I asked Ev some of the same questions with the same type of answers. >> Propnet >> > on 20m is tucked away on 14097, so being a narrow mode a good place for >> them >> > would be just under 10150. Since they are not involved in QSO's and are >> > simply transmitting beacons that would be a good place for them. >> > > >
