OK Sholto,. Ev is always very cooperative. Andy.
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Sholto Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andy, > > I am ok with this idea too but we have to start somewhere. > > Ev is being extremely cooperative in looking for a solution/compromise > and I have posted a message to the WSJT group asking for their help too. > > But I am seeing most JT65 and JT2 etc still using the 10.139 frequency > so thought maybe it was easier to see how flexible PropNet was and > bearing in mind they are the ones who recently moved down. > > 73, Sholto > KE7HPV. > > > Andrew O'Brien wrote: > > How about moving the JT65 stations, the freq was simply one suggested > > by Bonnie, nothing cast in stone. > > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Joe Veldhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> That would probably QRM the HF APRS channel, which is around 10.1495 > >> (10.1515 LSB, 2100-2300 Hz AF). > >> > >> Unfortunately, it's almost impossible to do any kind of frequency > >> coordination on 30m. It's been my experience that there isn't one single Hz > >> of bandwidth that is not occupied by CW, gigawatt RTTY stations, beacons, > >> winlids, or other operation. > >> > >> -Joe, N8FQ > >> > >> > >> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:55:46 -0600 > >> John Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > I asked Ev some of the same questions with the same type of answers. > >> Propnet > >> > on 20m is tucked away on 14097, so being a narrow mode a good place for > >> them > >> > would be just under 10150. Since they are not involved in QSO's and are > >> > simply transmitting beacons that would be a good place for them. > >> > > > > > > >
