What is the connection to the Winmor protocol here??

73 de LA5VNA Steinar



Charles Brabham wrote:
> The article mentions WinLink developer Rick Muething.
>
> Rick Muething installed the WinLink HF and VHF stuff in our area. 
>
> That was when we first noticed the new "packet node" with no callsign and the 
> alias "OFF". - Illegal as you can get.
>
> The "OFF" node cleverly screws up TheNet nodes so that the NODES list will 
> not display for users. 
>
> After some investigation, it was discovered that it was the TELPAC node Rick 
> Muething so kindly set up for us that was disrupting thePacket network in our 
> area.
>
> Anybody here think that it was all just a slight oversight, an error? - Or 
> does it sound more like something deliberate?
>
> After a public exposure followed by a few private threats, the "OFF" node 
> went off the air and Packet users here were once again able to enjoy the 
> network we built here.
>
> Yesterday while node surfing about 150 miles north of my location, I saw a 
> node list that had "OFF" listed on it - and the nodes to the north of that 
> one were mysteriously missing from the NODE list.
>
> Apparently there are potential legal issues about using more than one 
> node-hop in order to access and utilize a TELPAC station - so we'll just 
> eliminate those nasty Packet networks with their multiple node-hops, eh?
>
> Benito Mussolini would be proud!
>
> Hiram Percy Maxim, on the other hand,  would be sad and disgusted to see such 
> behavior by amateurs.
>
> If you see a no-callsign "OFF" or "DISABLE" node in your area and can't 
> access a NODES list, now you know the who, what and why of it.
>
> Heads up.
>
> 73 DE Charles, N5PVL
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.9/1637 - Release Date: 27.08.2008 
> 07:01
>
>
>   

Reply via email to