TKS Tony for the information,

>I've tested this theory by removing short 1-to-3 second segments of the signal 
>at random intervals and the mode continues to print despite >the missing 
>'chunks'. 
Yes MT63 has a good frequency and time diversity. And at 100 wpm, there are no 
many modes...
A Contestia 32 / 1K could be a better alternative than the 16/1K.

73
Patrick

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Tony 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2008 8:40 PM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Contestia 1K vs MT63?


  Patrick,

  I get the same minimum SNR for Contestia but can squeeze -8db out of MT63 
when using DM780 and IZ8BLY. Some MT63 programs have a higher decode threshold 
for reasons you've mentioned previously. 

  The threshold difference shows on-air as well as under controlled conditions 
and so it would seem that the best way to get the most out of MT63 is to use 
software that decodes deeper into the noise. 

  The 10-to-1 peak-to-average power ratio is an excellent point and it's 
obvious that Contestia will put more RF into the air on average. There's no 
doubt in my mind that the Contestia 16-1K will do better most of the time. 

  On the other hand, it does not seem to recover from the complete drop-outs 
that occur during deep fading or with lightning static the way MT63 does. 

  I've tested this theory by removing short 1-to-3 second segments of the 
signal at random intervals and the mode continues to print despite the missing 
'chunks'. As you say, this could be due to the difference in modulation speeds. 
Is there an alternative mode that I can test that might have similar 
characteristics? 

  Thanks, 

  Tony, K2MO


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: "Patrick Lindecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  To: <digitalradio@yahoogroups.com>
  Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2008 5:02 AM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Contestia 1K vs MT63?


  > Hello Tony,
  > 
  > According to my measures (under noise only):
  > * "16-1K": "Fast" 16 tones, bandwidth=1000 Hz, speed=62.5 bauds, 78.2 wpm, 
lowest S/N =-9 dB,
  > 
  > * MT63 1K: 100 wpm, lowest S/N  - 5 dB for 10 bauds (perhaps -7dB with the 
original program)  but due to the 
  > Pmean/Ppeak: 0.1, it is only theoritical, except if you prefer QRP 
transmissions. 
  > 
  >>I'm not sure if that's an accurate assessment as to why there is a 
difference, but it would seem so. Wonder if anyone can shed some light on this. 
  > The difference in Selective Fading conditions is perhaps due to the 
modulation speeds which are rather different.
  > 73
  > Patrick
  > 
  >  ----- Original Message ----- 
  >  From: Tony 
  >  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  >  Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2008 7:44 AM
  >  Subject: [digitalradio] Contestia 1K vs MT63?
  > 
  > 
  >  All, 
  > 
  >  I was playing with the Contestia mode in an attempt to duplicate the wpm 
rate of MT63. I configured Contestia with 16 tones and a bandwidth of 1K. The 
sensitivity of the two seemed to be the same and the wpm rate appeared to be 
close. 
  > 
  >  I then tested both modes with the HF path simulator dialed-in for 
selective fading with the SNR set a few db above the minimum decode threshold. 
As you can see below, print was better with MT63. 
  > 
  >  The deep fades caused garbled characters with Contestia and it would 
appear the better copy with MT63 is a result of the redundancy built into the 
mode. 
  > 
  >  I'm not sure if that's an accurate assessment as to why there is a 
difference, but it would seem so. Wonder if anyone can shed some light on this. 
  > 
  >  Tony, K2MO
  > 
  > 
  >  Path Simulation : Selective Fading
  >  SNR :  -3db / -6db
  > 
  > 
  >  Contestia 1K / 16 tone 
  > 
  >  SNR -3db
  > 
  >  THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG
  >  THE QUICK BROWN FOS OVER TH- >G
  >  THE BROWN FOXMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG
  >  THE QUICRO,N FOX JUMPS OVELAZY DOG
  > 
  >  SNR -6db
  > 
  >  TE QUCK BROW FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG
  >  THE QUG2NOWNS YVER THOEG
  >  THE BROWN FO#UBR OVER TE LAZY DOG
  >  THE QUIC^_^N FOX JUMPS OVELAZY DOG
  > 
  > 
  >  MT63 1K
  > 
  >  SNR -3db
  > 
  >  *DE K2MO*
  >  THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG
  >  THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG
  >  THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG
  >  THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG
  >  *EOT*
  > 
  >  SNR -6db
  > 
  >  *DE K2M
  >  TH QUICK &AOWN FOX JUOP; OVrR THE LAZY ROG
  >  THE Q%ICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG
  >  THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG
  >  THE QUICK BROWNFOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG
  >  *EOT*
  >   
  >  

Reply via email to