On 11/15/23 02:12, OLIVIER HUREAU wrote:
As mentioned here:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/ouSBtpMhD5KJp2osPfUXJktuoMQ/
<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/ouSBtpMhD5KJp2osPfUXJktuoMQ/ >
I have found out that the current reporting ecosystem uses two types
of XML Schema Definitions.
...
Upon investigation, I found that the XSD present in RFC 7489 Appendix
C (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7489#appendix-C) contains
a targetNamespace with the URI http://dmarc.org/dmarc-xml/0.1.
However, the website offers a different XSD. It seems plausible that
implementers may have downloaded the version from dmarc.org, which
lacks certain elements like /record/auth_result/spf/scope,
/policy_published/fo, /record/identifiers/envelope_from, and /version,
in contrast to the RFC version.
I can put an updated version on dmarc.org, but right now I'm trying to
get out of a hotel room. probably 48 hours minimum before I can get to
this, if somebody would be so kind as to identify the replacement.
--S.
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
