> On Mar 11, 2024, at 10:33 PM, Neil Anuskiewicz > <neil=40marmot-tech....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Wow, the stat on how many domain operators move to enforcing reject policy > sans aggregate reports shocked me. Trust the force, Luke.
It should not be a surprise the client/server protocol concept of “email reporting” was always and I still believe is considered a taboo as it can be a form of abuse when not negotiated, requested or solicited. It is an 100% optional feature to provide a reporting address. With DMARC policy publishing, for exploratory reasons only, I have reports sent to an email to newsgroup forum where I can privately review and so far, it has not provided any benefit beyond what is expected. I have advocated for a straight text report but I probably have to write a translator. The current format expects JSON/XML readers. Our wcDMARC verification processor does not have built-in support for reporting. All the best, Hector Santos
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
