On 3/14/2024 6:11 PM, John Levine wrote:
It appears that Todd Herr<todd.h...@valimail.com> said:
I agree that clarifying it can't hurt, obviously, ...
I disagree, it does hurt.
If we say you're allowed to use CNAMEs to point to DMARC records,
people are to say uh oh, is there something special here? What about
DKIM records? what about SPF records? how about SPF includes? or SPF
redirects?
Fair.
Really, there is nothing to say here, so let's not say it.
R's,
John
For some document consumers I still posit the original proposed text may
be useful for clarity, but to their point (and yours), it's already
presumed the reader has a working conceptual understanding of DNS; I see
your point how it could add only more questions.
- Mark Alley
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
