On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 9:11 AM John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote:
> It appears that Todd Herr <todd.h...@valimail.com> said: > >I agree that clarifying it can't hurt, obviously, ... > > I disagree, it does hurt. > > If we say you're allowed to use CNAMEs to point to DMARC records, > people are to say uh oh, is there something special here? What about > DKIM records? what about SPF records? how about SPF includes? or SPF > redirects? > > Really, there is nothing to say here, so let's not say it. > +1, I don't understand what needs to be clarified here. If I ask for a TXT record at a given name, I expect to get one back (or a non-success code). It really doesn't matter to DMARC whether that process traversed a CNAME record in the process. (Or if it does matter, I've yet to see a reason why.) -MSK, p11g
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
