On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 16:42:04 +0000 RW <rwmailli...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:00:39 -0500 > Chris Brennan <xa...@xaerolimit.net> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Giorgos Keramidas > > <keram...@freebsd.org>wrote: > > > > > I'm sorry that you had to install software that you don't really > > > need and I can help you clean up by saving your installed ports as > > > 'binary packages' and re-installing just the bits that you > > > _really_ want to have around. Other than that, I don't know if > > > there's any way to change the status quo of the vim ports to be > > > able to satisfy automatically both types of user needs. > > > > > > > > My not a 'make config' target that asks weather we want > > vim/gvim/xvim (if X isn't installed?) > > There's already a slave port FWIW I just had a look and for me there is practically no difference. The additional direct dependencies are commonplace desktop dependency ports, and the vim binary shrinks from 1.7MB to 1.4MB, just 298kB. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
