Yes. That's was what I was talking about. From, Emily
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 2:52 AM, Marie Earley <eir...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Intersectionality is the name for it > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersectionality > > ... and this is what it looks like in practice > http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/womens-blog/2014/mar/31/laura-bates-everyday-sexism-double-discrimination-intersectionality > > Marie > > ------------------------------ > From: emilymonro...@gmail.com > Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 22:51:22 -0500 > To: gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Adrienne Wadewitz featured in short piece about > Gendergap on the English Wikipedia > > > On the other hand, I'd like to point out that the thread topic had already > drifted to internet comments when I commented. I'm not sure why I was > singled out. > > And yes, what Janine-- someone who is sexist is also likely to be ablelist > (spelling?), racist, classist, etc. > > From, > Emily > > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Janine Starykowicz < > jrst...@barntowire.com> wrote: > > Is there really a type of misogyny that stands alone from other nastiness? > In my experience, those who make comments against women also do about other > races, ethnics, sexual orientations, classes, etc. > > The problem with misogyny on Wikipedia is probably more that it is easier > to know if another editor is a woman vs. any of the other biases. > > Aside from having everyone use non-feminine usernames and not divulge > personal information, I'm not sure what else would work if this is the case. > > Janine > > Emily Monroe wrote: > > Actually, I think that's true for all minorities--I know the comment > section in the online edition of one of my local > newspapers can turn pretty ugly if an article is written about a black guy > getting arrested. That's less likely to happen if > the suspect is white. > > From, > Emily > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Valerie Aurora <vale...@adainitiative.org > <mailto:vale...@adainitiative.org>> wrote: > > Abusive comments are a gender thing. Stories about or by women are > more likely to get abusive comments, in public and private, based > solely on the gender of the subject or the author. > > -VAL > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap > > > > _______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap > >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
