To add, the thirdeye code directory was excluded from past releases and so was _not_ part of the Pinot project release. (A topic discussed several times on list)
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 4:54 PM Mayank Shrivastava <maya...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Justin, > Thank you for bringing up the discussion aspect. It seems that it may > purely have been an accidental oversight, but PPMCs were aware of the > discussions as well as the decision.The key reason was that the ThirdEye > project did not gain much traction in the open source, and as stated in [1] > the ThirdEye team felt running it under ASF did not have much return on > investment. Hope this helps clarify. > > [1] Discussion to move ThirdEye of Apache Pinot > < > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r23c350271bd907718c6b777b0091e493f93ab407443528d4d549172a%40%3Cprivate.pinot.apache.org%3E > > > Best Regards, > Mayank > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 4:09 PM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for taking action on this. > > > > Still one things concerns me, the discussion of removal of ThirdEye is > > unusual as it happened offlist and it seems it was only brought back to > the > > list after a decision was made. For decisions like this, all of the PMC > > need to be informed and the decision needs to be made in the open on the > > list. The source of the issue to me seems to be commit rights and I > think a > > better way of resolving this would have been considering lowering the > > commit bar. Was that considered in the off list discussions? > > > > Kind Regards, > > Justin > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >
