Hi Felix and JB, Sounds good. We'll cancel this vote and prepare a new WIP release that addresses the feedback mentioned in this thread.
Best, Hezheng On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 10:24 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Hi, > > I would recommend to cancel this vote and prepare a new release including: > - cleanup on the icon and png file about license > - flag DISCLAIMER on WIP > - improve NOTICE file > > Regards > JB > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 9:27 PM Hezheng Yin <yinhezheng1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi Felix, thanks for the suggestion. If we were able to resolve the > > licensing issues Justin raised, would you still recommend us switching to > > WIP DISCLAIMER? > > > > Hi Justin, thanks for the clarification. We have gone through all the > > image files in the release: > > > > 1. All flaticon icons [1] are replaced with blueprintjs icons [2] that > have > > Apache 2.0 license. > > 2. For images created by ourselves, do we need to formally license them? > If > > so, is there a guideline that we can follow? > > 3. In DevLake UI, we also make use of GitHub/GitLab/Jenkins/Jira logos on > > the integration page. We found their logo usage guidelines [3][4][5][6] > > online but couldn't find a formal license for these logos. For example, > the > > GitHub Logos and Usage page [3] states it's ok to "Use the Octocat or > > GitHub logo to advertise that your product has built-in GitHub > > integration". Is it compliant with Apache policy to include such logos in > > the release? > > > > We'll restart the voting process on the DevLake mailing list once we > > address the issues above. > > > > [1] https://www.flaticon.com/pricing > > [2] https://blueprintjs.com/ > > [3] https://github.com/logos > > [4] > > > https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/brand-activation/trademark-guidelines/ > > [5] https://www.jenkins.io/press/ > > [6] https://www.atlassian.com/company/news/press-kit > > > > Best, > > Hezheng > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 8:52 PM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > And to be sure, we should go through the community vote step again > before > > > > making another voting thread in general@incubator.apache.org. Is > this > > > > correct? Thanks in advance! > > > > > > Yes your PPMC will ned to vote on the new release candidate before > > > bringing it for a vote by the incubator PMC. > > > > > > Kind Regards, > > > Justin > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
