> - It is unclear what license yarn-3.4.1.cjs is under - why not just say > it contains multiple pieces of 3rd party code under different licenses?
yarn-3.4.1.cjs js a binary too. How about use `corepack` to ensure we are using the same version of yarn instead? For more inforamtion about corepack: https://nodejs.org/api/corepack.html On Tue, Nov 21, 2023, at 06:01, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > I think a little more work is needed: > - It is unclear what license yarn-3.4.1.cjs is under - why not just say > it contains multiple pieces of 3rd party code under different licenses? > - You are misisng the BSD license for Yarn. The full text of the > license needs to be included. > - You still need to, as required by the license, include the full text > of the MIT licenses, which include the copyright line. > - What code is "Copyright (c) 2015, Rebecca Turner”, and what license > is it under? > - What code is "Copyright Joyent, Inc. and other Node contributors.”, > and what license is it under? > - What code is "Copyright Node.js contributors. All rights reserved.", > and what license is it under? > - What code is "Copyright (c) 2014 Blake Embrey > (he...@blakeembrey.com)”, and what license is it under? > > Kind Regards, > Justin > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Xuanwo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
