On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 10:09:04PM +0300, Arthur ??i??eic?? wrote: > În ziua de vineri, 13 mai 2016, la 19:12:23 EEST, Willy Tarreau a scris: > > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 06:59:49PM +0300, Arthur ??i??eic?? wrote: > > > I already went back and forth between the 2 versions to confirm that it's > > > still working fine in 1.6.4. > > > > But using a version that you rebuilt for this or the version that you had > > built some time ago ? I just want to ensure that your build environment > > still produces valid executables in fact (as I trust it used to do last > > time you built a working 1.6.4). > > They are distro packages. As much as I can see they are built the same. I > will > put the output of '-vv' at the end the email. > > However, one major change might be that 1.6.4 was built with gcc 5 and > haproxy > 1.6.5 is built with gcc 6.
OK, one more reason for first trying to build 1.6.4 from sources using the same procedure you use for 1.6.5, and verifying if it has the same issue. > > Let's do the strace first :-) > > > > I hope you don't mind if I send the traces off-list. I'm not sure how much > private info is in there. Definitely! > I will attach 2 traces, for 1.6.4 and for 1.6.5. Thanks. willy
