That diagram isn’t consistent with what Homenet has been trying to build: it appears to be a base assumption of this work that there is a single virtual CPE router, and that’s not a homenet problem.
> On Sep 18, 2019, at 4:14 AM, Alexandre Petrescu > <alexandre.petre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Le 17/09/2019 à 15:34, Ted Lemon a écrit : >> On Sep 17, 2019, at 9:29 AM, Alexandre Petrescu >> <alexandre.petre...@gmail.com <mailto:alexandre.petre...@gmail.com> >> <mailto:alexandre.petre...@gmail.com <mailto:alexandre.petre...@gmail.com>>> >> wrote: >>> Thanks for the reply. As I do not author the draft, and my >>> colleague is not subscribed to this list, I paste here his reply to >>> your question: >>>> It is not really clear if the draft is appropriate to the homenet >>>> wg. One can state that this draft presents a tool/solution >>>> (service yang model) for orchestator to manage the different uCPE >>>> equipment. uCPE eqipment is not regular cpe/homenet device. uCPE >>>> is a host that hosts guest OSs. uCPE is like PC with virtualbox where the >>>> VMs are running (VMs such as homenet router,cisco >>>> router, firewall, SD-WAN.) >> Thanks. The question I would ask here is, is it intended that this >> uCPE integrate into a multi-subnet, multi-homed homenet? > > Temporary speaking for my colleague, this is what he has to say to the > question: > >> If we are talking, for example, about several IPv6 prefixes that are >> learned from muliple ISPs I could suggest that uCPE is transparent in >> this case. On the figure below we can see that uCPE connects 2 PHY >> ports via virtual Links to the Virtual Ports of VNF. So it is the >> VNF(vRouter) that is doing the job. There is example where the >> constructor of equipment merges the uCPE NFVIs with router (i find it >> as a very particular case). >> If we are talking about implementation of babel in the uCPE please >> check the figure below. I suppose it is a vRouter that will have this >> functionality (not uCPE NFVIs). >> P.S. There is a management of NFVIs that maybe could be integrated. >> But it is a question if there is an interest to do that. > > +--------------------------------+ > |uCPE | > | | > | +--------+ | > | |-----|vRouter |-----|----WAN1 > LAN1 ------|----| | +--------+ | > | | | | | > | | | | | > LAN2 ------|----|------| |---------|----WAN2 > | | | > | | | > LAN3 ------|----| | > | | > | | > +--------------------------------+
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
