Juliusz Chroboczek <j...@irif.fr> wrote:
> In this WG, we did spend a lot of effort ensuring that all of our
> specifications have at least two independent implementations.Juliusz, please go read RFC2026. You are completely out of order. Proposed standards do not need *ANY* interoperable implementations. 2nd step (used to Draft Standard, now Internet Standard) do. (Routing WGs sometimes have a higher standard for things that could kill the Internet) -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
