On 2023/09/12 16:29:04 Torsten Krah wrote:
> Am Dienstag, dem 12.09.2023 um 18:08 +0200 schrieb Oleg Kalnichevski:
> > This statement is meaningless. All versions of HttpClient have their
> > own http classes. And all versions of HttpClient have always been
> > using
> > JSSE for its transport security and nothing else. If you are not
> > happy
> > with JSSE, Oracle's implementation of JSSE, or anything we provide as
> > a
> > project, build your own.
> 
> I never said anywhere I am not happy with the project nor anything else
> about the JSSE impl, I don't know where you read that - if I would not
> be happy with, I would not use it and ask questions on the PHA support.
> 
> The project does provide a user mailing list, so either you want to
> help like Micheal and provide something useful to your users questions
> or you don't want to help, but in that case why being subscribed to the
> user mailing list in the first place?
> 
> It was a simple question about PHA which Micheal answered (thanks for
> that) and that's it - your whole point / discussion did not shed
> anything new on the topic at all.
> 
> Conclusion: Micheal did help me and at least I won't discuss that any
> further, the topic is answered, thanks.

Getting back to the actual topic: I consider Xulei's justification not to 
implement as just non-sense because he's totally focused on HTTP/2. The world 
does not revolve around HTTP and there are a plenty of other protocols, maybe 
even custom ones which could benefit from. SunJSSE has always been mediocre and 
crap on the server-side, luckily Tomcat supports OpenSSL out of the box.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpclient-users-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: httpclient-users-h...@hc.apache.org

Reply via email to