On 2023/09/12 16:29:04 Torsten Krah wrote: > Am Dienstag, dem 12.09.2023 um 18:08 +0200 schrieb Oleg Kalnichevski: > > This statement is meaningless. All versions of HttpClient have their > > own http classes. And all versions of HttpClient have always been > > using > > JSSE for its transport security and nothing else. If you are not > > happy > > with JSSE, Oracle's implementation of JSSE, or anything we provide as > > a > > project, build your own. > > I never said anywhere I am not happy with the project nor anything else > about the JSSE impl, I don't know where you read that - if I would not > be happy with, I would not use it and ask questions on the PHA support. > > The project does provide a user mailing list, so either you want to > help like Micheal and provide something useful to your users questions > or you don't want to help, but in that case why being subscribed to the > user mailing list in the first place? > > It was a simple question about PHA which Micheal answered (thanks for > that) and that's it - your whole point / discussion did not shed > anything new on the topic at all. > > Conclusion: Micheal did help me and at least I won't discuss that any > further, the topic is answered, thanks.
Getting back to the actual topic: I consider Xulei's justification not to implement as just non-sense because he's totally focused on HTTP/2. The world does not revolve around HTTP and there are a plenty of other protocols, maybe even custom ones which could benefit from. SunJSSE has always been mediocre and crap on the server-side, luckily Tomcat supports OpenSSL out of the box. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpclient-users-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: httpclient-users-h...@hc.apache.org