Hi everyone, Well, we lost power here again. I was not at home, but I guess a dump truck smashed into some power poles and took out half the city; actually tripped most of the breakers in the panel. Anyways, the power was out for just a few seconds and of course my servers shutdown on me after power being out for just a second or two. Here is my syslog from two different machines. I included everything just in case.
“Proton": https://hastebin.com/uluqaqetuc.bash "Plex”: https://hastebin.com/apudatonun.sql Let me know what you think. I just tested everything over the weekend and it all worked perfectly; cut power and machines stayed up until it was time to shut them down (I temporarily configured them to shut down after 5 minutes so I didn’t have to wait for the entire battery to drain). I seriously at am a total loss. I guess HDD Hibernation was not the culprit either since I’m still getting the same results. Ugh. Thanks everyone for all your help so far!!!!! Regards, Todd -- Todd Benivegna // t...@benivegna.com On Aug 11, 2020, 7:32 AM -0400, Larry Fahnoe <fah...@fahnoetech.com>, wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 12:46 AM Roger Price <ro...@rogerprice.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 10 Aug 2020, Todd Benivegna wrote: > > > > > > > synoups: https://hastebin.com/xexafofiha.bash > > > > > > Wow! What a mess. It looks as if Synology wanted to write their own > > > "NUT", but > > > decided it would be easier to put their ideas in a script when they saw > > > they > > > could use upssched.conf to call it. NUT intends such a script for timer > > > management. Synology use it for general system management. > > Roger's comment confirms my suspicion of NUT as provided by Synology. They > make a great NAS product, but then they bolt on all manner of other things. > In my opinion, best to leave the NAS as an appliance configured and managed > by their GUI tools, and let it just be a NUT client rather than trying to > configure it to be the NUT server. I use and find the RaspberryPi's to be > very capable NUT servers with the rest of my systems (including my Synology > NAS) as NUT clients. Much simpler to manage that way as you have complete > control over a fairly current NUT as provided by Raspbian (a Debian > derivative). The only kink I've run into is that the Synology NAS as a NUT > client provides no means of changing the NUT credentials, so you have to use > default credentials for NUT (another reason to make sure NUT is on a > protected network). > > --Larry > > -- > Larry Fahnoe, Fahnoe Technology Consulting, fah...@fahnoetech.com > Minneapolis, Minnesota www.FahnoeTech.com > _______________________________________________ > Nut-upsuser mailing list > Nut-upsuser@alioth-lists.debian.net > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
