On 2014-03-20 13:51:03 [+0100], Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > Hi, Hi, > >>And why is '.PHONY: override_dh_strip' necessary? > > > >https://wiki.debian.org/DebugPackage says so. > > Interesting... but unfortunately that page doesn't give an explanation. > It's probably correct to have it, but I would like to know why. >
A phony target is a hint that this rules does not build a file. None of the dh rules do this so actually each one of them should be phony. The info page of make says it is good for performance. Well. bah. I think we can live without that one. > Is there still something todo for the new debian/rules? If rebuilt it on wheezy with new & old files: --- old_rules/files.txt 2014-03-20 22:30:38.961220037 +0100 +++ new_rules/files.txt 2014-03-20 22:32:00.845218824 +0100 @@ -110,9 +110,9 @@ ./clamav-docs/usr/share/doc/clamav-docs/BUGS ./clamav-docs/usr/share/doc/clamav-docs/changelog.Debian.gz ./clamav-docs/usr/share/doc/clamav-docs/changelog.gz -./clamav-docs/usr/share/doc/clamav-docs/clamav-mirror-howto.pdf +./clamav-docs/usr/share/doc/clamav-docs/clamav-mirror-howto.pdf.gz ./clamav-docs/usr/share/doc/clamav-docs/clamav-mirror-howto.tex.gz -./clamav-docs/usr/share/doc/clamav-docs/clamdoc.pdf +./clamav-docs/usr/share/doc/clamav-docs/clamdoc.pdf.gz ./clamav-docs/usr/share/doc/clamav-docs/clamdoc.tex.gz ./clamav-docs/usr/share/doc/clamav-docs/clam.eps.gz ./clamav-docs/usr/share/doc/clamav-docs/copyright @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ ./clamav-docs/usr/share/doc/clamav-docs/NEWS.Debian.gz ./clamav-docs/usr/share/doc/clamav-docs/README.Debian.gz ./clamav-docs/usr/share/doc/clamav-docs/README.gz -./clamav-docs/usr/share/doc/clamav-docs/signatures.pdf +./clamav-docs/usr/share/doc/clamav-docs/signatures.pdf.gz ./clamav-docs/usr/share/doc/clamav-docs/signatures.tex.gz ./clamav-freshclam ./clamav-freshclam_0.98.1+dfsg-5_amd64.deb @@ -418,7 +418,6 @@ ./libclamav-dev/usr/include ./libclamav-dev/usr/include/clamav.h ./libclamav-dev/usr/lib -./libclamav-dev/usr/lib/libclamav.la ./libclamav-dev/usr/lib/libclamav.so ./libclamav-dev/usr/lib/pkgconfig ./libclamav-dev/usr/lib/pkgconfig/libclamav.pc that means a few pdf are now compressed. Is this bad? The removal of the .la file: That one is used by libtool and libltdl. I just built c-icap-modules_0.1.6-1, dansguardian_2.10.1.1-5, havp_0.92a-2 and python-clamav_0.4.1-7 because they all build-depend on libclamav6. They all built fine. The other problem might be if someone tries to staticly link against libclamav. This is not the case right now (not for the four packages I just mentioned). So I would say, that I am fine with dropping that file. > > Best regards, > Andreas Sebastian _______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list Pkg-clamav-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
