On 2014-03-23 20:22:36 [-0400], Scott Kitterman wrote:
> The beauty of dh-autoreconf is that it does and then undoes reconfigured each 
> time so there's nothing to worry about. We don't need a patch.
Yes, it undoes mostly what it did. "git diff" shows differences but
thatis okay.

> >I think it's better, if the unstable package builds as is in all 
> >supported releases.
> 
> The drive for running reconfigured is primarily for supporting newer ports 
> and other features as they are added.  This isn't a concern for oldstable, so 
> not reconf'ing there is perfectly fine. 

For new ports "--with autotools_dev" should be enough because you do not
need to redo the Makefiles but simple config.guess and frieds to
guess new uname and so on.

> It is better if it builds unmodified for all releases, but it doesn't have to 
> build identically. 

I don't mind having this. Anyway, we can drop it around May once Wheezy
is one year old and Debian drops support for oldstable :)

> It looks like it's getting really close to ready. I want to wait until late 
> in the week to upload again to see if we get any more Debconf translations 
> in. There is time yet to make sure it's sorted. 

Andreas fixed it already.

> 
> Scott K

Sebastian

_______________________________________________
Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list
Pkg-clamav-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel

Reply via email to