Re: Bug#608413: Possible patch for libio-socket-inet6-perl?
Hi On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 03:00:20PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:50:42 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: I said on IRC the debian/rules change was wrong, and for the rest I'd like an ack/review from a perl person, which I'm not. I don't know enough about sockets and ipv6 to make real judgement, but: Julien, on the other side I got confirmation from Julien Blache in #608413, that the backported change from the diff 2.54 to 2.55 would work again with the cricket setup. That's fine, but this change does not contain the fix for https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=55901 (inet_pton / inet_ntop import warnings) which I remember myself and which was very annoying at least, so I'd rather opt for moving 2.65 to testing (giving some code review from another more knowledgable person). I have prepared the NMU for 2.65 with the change dh_clean - dh_prep instead of using dh_clean -k. But we still need a review regarding ipv6 changes from a knowledgable person ;-) Bests Salvatore diff -u libio-socket-inet6-perl-2.65/debian/changelog libio-socket-inet6-perl-2.65/debian/changelog --- libio-socket-inet6-perl-2.65/debian/changelog +++ libio-socket-inet6-perl-2.65/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +libio-socket-inet6-perl (2.65-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Revert changes to the dh_clean call in the install target: use dh_prep +instead of dh_clean -k. + + -- Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org Sun, 16 Jan 2011 09:33:09 +0100 + libio-socket-inet6-perl (2.65-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release (closes: Bug#575531) diff -u libio-socket-inet6-perl-2.65/debian/rules libio-socket-inet6-perl-2.65/debian/rules --- libio-socket-inet6-perl-2.65/debian/rules +++ libio-socket-inet6-perl-2.65/debian/rules @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ install: dh_testdir dh_testroot - dh_clean + dh_prep dh_installdirs $(MAKE) install PREFIX=$(TMP)/usr signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Fwd: Squeeze and Logitech, Inc. QuickCam Pro 4000
Slobodan Aleksi?? wrote: Sorry, I wrote on the wrong list! Sorry, but yes. :) The proper list for your question would be debian-user or - if the problem has been located as a kernel problem - debian-kernel @lists.debian.org. The debian-release mailing list is to be used for planning the upcoming release. Regards, Joey -- MIME - broken solution for a broken design. -- Ralf Baechle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110116084702.gr14...@finlandia.home.infodrom.org
Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny
* Matthias Klose: get the files from testing/unstable touch debian/control.in debian/rules debian/control I end up with this: mkdir -p /tmp/buildd/openjdk-6-6b18-1.8.3/build/plugin/icedteanp \ cd /tmp/buildd/openjdk-6-6b18-1.8.3/build/plugin/icedteanp \ x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -g -O2 \ -DJDK_UPDATE_VERSION=\18\ \ -DPLUGIN_VERSION=\IcedTea6 1.8.3 (6b18-1.8.3-2~lenny1)\ \ -DMOZILLA_VERSION_COLLAPSED=1090019 \ -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include \ -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/directfb -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/pixman-1 \ -I/usr/include/xulrunner-1.9/stable -I/usr/include/nspr \ -fPIC -o /tmp/buildd/openjdk-6-6b18-1.8.3/build/plugin/icedteanp/IcedTeaNPPlugin.o -c /tmp/buildd/openjdk-6-6b18-1.8.3/build/../plugin/icedteanp/IcedTeaNPPlugin.cc In file included from /tmp/buildd/openjdk-6-6b18-1.8.3/build/../plugin/icedteanp/IcedTeaJavaRequestProcessor.h:46, from /tmp/buildd/openjdk-6-6b18-1.8.3/build/../plugin/icedteanp/IcedTeaScriptablePluginObject.h:49, from /tmp/buildd/openjdk-6-6b18-1.8.3/build/../plugin/icedteanp/IcedTeaNPPlugin.cc:51: /tmp/buildd/openjdk-6-6b18-1.8.3/build/../plugin/icedteanp/IcedTeaNPPlugin.h:43:27: error: nsThreadUtils.h: No such file or directory /tmp/buildd/openjdk-6-6b18-1.8.3/build/../plugin/icedteanp/IcedTeaNPPlugin.cc:56:31: error: nsIPluginInstance.h: No such file or directory I suppose we need to disable building the plugin on lenny (it's in a separate package there anyway, I think). Is there an easy way to do this? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87vd1pw4rq@mid.deneb.enyo.de
Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 05:10:39 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: On 14.01.2011 20:46, Florian Weimer wrote: Do you plane to switch to IcedTea 1.9 or a later version during the squeeze release? I will not do this myself, altough I would welcome this. Apparently Debian does allow these kind of update for the sun-java6 packages, so I would expect the same thing for openjdk-6. How does that follow? These kinds of updates are sort of allowed for sun-java6 because it's non-free so there's no choice. That does not apply to openjdk, as far as I know. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny
Hi Florian, On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote: I suppose we need to disable building the plugin on lenny (it's in a separate package there anyway, I think). Is there an easy way to do this? I think there is some code in debian/rules: ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH), alpha hppa sparc64)$(filter $(distrel), dapper)) with_plugin_pkg = no else with_plugin_pkg = yes endif Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTinX4wXJbSvLMcN8zNu5NuZp=oxde0ijomzqb...@mail.gmail.com
Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny
Hi, On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: How does that follow? These kinds of updates are sort of allowed for sun-java6 because it's non-free so there's no choice. That does not apply to openjdk, as far as I know. I think that openjdk is not that different. Oracle does not release small patches. They release several non-free binary tarballs (sun-java6) and a GPL-2 source tarball (openjdk). It is almost impossible to extract individual fixes from the source tarball. Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinhnjw-my+iwdgiozdxuksmv4-vdu066cxu5...@mail.gmail.com
Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny
* Torsten Werner: Hi, On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: How does that follow? These kinds of updates are sort of allowed for sun-java6 because it's non-free so there's no choice. That does not apply to openjdk, as far as I know. I think that openjdk is not that different. Oracle does not release small patches. They release several non-free binary tarballs (sun-java6) and a GPL-2 source tarball (openjdk). It is almost impossible to extract individual fixes from the source tarball. Have there been any OpenJDK 6 releases at all? AFAICT, Debian is actually shipping IcedTea releases, but those are re-rebranded as IcedTea. (Now building with with_plugin_pkg=no, let's see if the result will be usable.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87lj2lw1qs@mid.deneb.enyo.de
Bug#610216: unblock: chromium-browser/6.0.472.63~r59945-5
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please unblock package chromium-browser chromium-browser (6.0.472.63~r59945-5) unstable; urgency=high * Backported security patches from stable: - High Bad pointer handling in node iteration. Credit to Sergey Glazunov. - High Stale pointer with CSS + canvas. Credit to Sergey Glazunov. - High Stale pointer with CSS + cursors. Credit to Jan Tošovský. - High Stale pointer with SVG use element. Credited anonymously; plus indepdent discovery by miaubiz. - High Vorbis decoder buffer overflows. Credit to David Warren of CERT. - High Bad cast in anchor handling. Credit to Sergey Glazunov. - High Bad cast in video handling. Credit to Sergey Glazunov. - High Stale rendering node after DOM node removal. Credit to Martin Barbella; plus independent discovery by Google Chrome Security Team (SkyLined) unblock chromium-browser/6.0.472.63~r59945-5 Cheers, Giuseppe. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEUEARECAAYFAk0yy5MACgkQNxpp46476aocKACYrRQrIsqFksE2ol69xaTakapY FQCfQglpnw4plN/NBf/Xrlg0aXp3adc= =w3QU -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110116104231.2848.16106.report...@sd6-casa.iuculano.it
Re: Mass (non invasive) NMUs planned to fix debconf translations broken in multiple packages
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org): Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org): I have ready NMUs for most of the affeted packages. I can upload them soon. My plans are to upload before the end of the upcoming week-end an NMU for each of the affected package(s). This happened yesterday. A few packages were uploaded in t-p-u, when unstable had a newer upstream version that never entered testing. Unblocks have been requested for packages uploaded to unstable. I did nothing special for packages uploaded to t-p-u as my understanding is that they're monitored by the release team anyway. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny
* Florian Weimer: AFAICT, Debian is actually shipping IcedTea releases, but those are re-rebranded as IcedTea. Sorry, re-rebranded as OpenJDK. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87vd1pum3t@mid.deneb.enyo.de
Bug#610052: unblock: util-linux/2.17.2-6
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org): On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 07:55:15 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package util-linux This is a translation update that got pre-approval by the release team. (https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/12/msg01029.html) unblock util-linux/2.17.2-6 In the mean time LaMont uploaded -7 to fix a RC issue. However, the da.po and sk.po translation files seem broken, with question marks instead of the non-ascii characters. Hmm, LaMont, would it be possible for you to reupload with fixed PO files (I think you just need to dig them out from the BTSthey have probably been broken by the infamous mutt encoding bug)? This, assuming the release team is OK with that, of course. If you can't, I can upload an NMU as I did for many packages yesterday. Alternatively, we could first wait for -7 to enter testing, then fix the PO files but, here, I doubt we'd have enough time if the release is very close. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#610052: unblock: util-linux/2.17.2-6
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:35:02 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: Alternatively, we could first wait for -7 to enter testing, then fix the PO files but, here, I doubt we'd have enough time if the release is very close. I don't really see the point of introducing more broken translations in testing. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Requesting pre-approval for a samba upload to fix file descriptor leak in pam_winbind
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org): Yes, and I find no free time for looking at this more deeply. :-( Of course, an easy fix would be using my patch without thinking further as the bug reporter said that this fixed the problem for him. This is what I finally did. I'm waiting for the bug reporter to confirm that the uploaded package do fix the file descriptor leak he noticed. This is not a perfect solution as my patch should be redundant with upstream's fix in samba 3.5.6but, as the bug reporter confirmed that unpatched 3.5.6 still has the fd leak, I think this is the less worse way to go. I'll wait for the bug reporter confirmation then ask for an unblock. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#610224: unblock: calendarserver/2.4.dfsg-2.1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package calendarserver There is a bug I have detected with calendarserver 2.4.dfsg-2.1 currently in squeeze. It has been filed here - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610124 . Upgrading to calendarserver 2.4.dfsg-4 should fix this problem. I had already filed a request to unblock calendarserver earlier but it was turned down. But then I did not explain clearly the impact of the problem. As suggested by a more experienced maintainer, I raised a bug reg. the problem with complete details (bugid#610124) and sending an unblock request again as I feel this is a serious enough bug. Kindly go through the bug and if you find it serious enough, unblock calendarserver. unblock calendarserver/2.4.dfsg-2.1 -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110116113657.4561.63655.report...@rahul-laptop.amaram.name
Re: [SRM] Updating ia32-libs* in lenny
Hi, On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 01:30:30AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Sun, January 16, 2011 00:28, Philipp Kern wrote: On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 07:07:50PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: ia32-libs-gtk: Looks ok'ish. I'll do a final review once it hits the queue, though, so please go ahead. On its way to the queue. is there a reason why there are old sources of glib2.0 and pango1.0 included? ./srcs/glib2.0_2.16.6-1+lenny1.dsc ./srcs/glib2.0_2.16.6.orig.tar.gz ./srcs/glib2.0_2.16.6-3.diff.gz ./srcs/glib2.0_2.16.6-1+lenny1.diff.gz ./srcs/glib2.0_2.16.6-3.dsc ./srcs/pango1.0_1.20.5.orig.tar.gz ./srcs/pango1.0_1.20.5-6.diff.gz ./srcs/pango1.0_1.20.5-5+lenny1.diff.gz ./srcs/pango1.0_1.20.5-6.dsc ./srcs/pango1.0_1.20.5-5+lenny1.dsc The old ones naturally don't verify their checksums against what's in the pool, because they were dropped from it. Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [SRM] Updating ia32-libs* in lenny
On Sun, January 16, 2011 14:41, Philipp Kern wrote: Hi, On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 01:30:30AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Sun, January 16, 2011 00:28, Philipp Kern wrote: On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 07:07:50PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: ia32-libs-gtk: Looks ok'ish. I'll do a final review once it hits the queue, though, so please go ahead. On its way to the queue. is there a reason why there are old sources of glib2.0 and pango1.0 included? This is because of the way the current packaging scripts work and I didn't change anything besides refresh the packages. The security archive contains the -5+lenny1 version and the regular archive contains -6. The script fetches both sources but as you'll see in the end only the -6 binary ends up in the package. So it's basically the extra source that is cached. I could remove them by hand if you want after the fetch stage; it seems however desirable to only refresh the packages for stable uploads and not to be changing the packaging itself. In any case this only affects the source package. Cheers, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/346edb3e3e742916bca11deb154eea2e.squir...@wm.kinkhorst.nl
Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote: * Florian Weimer: AFAICT, Debian is actually shipping IcedTea releases, but those are re-rebranded as IcedTea. Sorry, re-rebranded as OpenJDK. Oracle occasionally releases source tarballs at http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk6/promoted/. The icedtea project adds some patches, a build system, and some smaller components like the browser plugin. All distributions use icedtea to build their binary packages. Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=yQTqBWru0x6t3cTAYSWf51wxuexh-_3=qa...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#610216: unblock: chromium-browser/6.0.472.63~r59945-5
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:42:31 +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package chromium-browser chromium-browser (6.0.472.63~r59945-5) unstable; urgency=high * Backported security patches from stable: - High Bad pointer handling in node iteration. Credit to Sergey Glazunov. - High Stale pointer with CSS + canvas. Credit to Sergey Glazunov. - High Stale pointer with CSS + cursors. Credit to Jan Tošovský. - High Stale pointer with SVG use element. Credited anonymously; plus indepdent discovery by miaubiz. - High Vorbis decoder buffer overflows. Credit to David Warren of CERT. - High Bad cast in anchor handling. Credit to Sergey Glazunov. - High Bad cast in video handling. Credit to Sergey Glazunov. - High Stale rendering node after DOM node removal. Credit to Martin Barbella; plus independent discovery by Google Chrome Security Team (SkyLined) Don't these things have CVE IDs? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#608413: Possible patch for libio-socket-inet6-perl?
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 09:43:51 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Hi On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 03:00:20PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:50:42 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: I said on IRC the debian/rules change was wrong, and for the rest I'd like an ack/review from a perl person, which I'm not. I don't know enough about sockets and ipv6 to make real judgement, but: Julien, on the other side I got confirmation from Julien Blache in #608413, that the backported change from the diff 2.54 to 2.55 would work again with the cricket setup. That's fine, but this change does not contain the fix for https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=55901 (inet_pton / inet_ntop import warnings) which I remember myself and which was very annoying at least, so I'd rather opt for moving 2.65 to testing (giving some code review from another more knowledgable person). I have prepared the NMU for 2.65 with the change dh_clean - dh_prep instead of using dh_clean -k. But we still need a review regarding ipv6 changes from a knowledgable person ;-) Please go back to dh_clean -k, and upload ASAP with urgency=high. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Request upload of Docky 2.0.10 to Squeeze
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:10:55 +0100, Rico Tzschichholz wrote: Hello, I am aware of the current deep-freeze of squeeze, but i want to propose a bugfix-only-release of Docky which only includes cherry-picked patches and translation updates! NAK. It's too late for non-critical fixes. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#609622: unblock: update-manager/0.200.5
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 20:54:17 -0400, David Prévot wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package update-manager What's with + * NOT RELEASED YET - changelog needs completion! ? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#609622: unblock: update-manager/0.200.5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Le 16/01/2011 11:06, Julien Cristau a écrit : On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 20:54:17 -0400, David Prévot wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package update-manager What's with + * NOT RELEASED YET - changelog needs completion! ? I'd guess Emilio forgot to remove this line when he added the Debian changelog documenting l10n update (upstream changelog being obsolete, the Debian one is the important one): upstream 0.200.5 has been released in order to permit this l10n upload. Is there a proper way to edit already uploaded changelog? Regards David -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNMwwYAAoJELgqIXr9/gnyRMMQALz/LYJ+h2uur+eoEl+nBNko ySbP7BVobIOQqdvQNCs8UYm6VVMR4MgcJwbbathlMhUZ1NtXK7I0LNNIpriecf0K zhnpE63W9iajDOdO5ywnhpgULk+C44B7cHIa00YgWY4WrkgbaBo1Snrogf6yt5Me GGmgdQxSA6F9rmJKOvTxwuoCTp4sc/zI/f/G23VBxBDw+hv86FpuXF4fRr0CIQS6 mE0RwFNCNlI1FzInIqhJ/02W+pECe/S4yt06dPyX9QWFAdRK/arj4MnGLlQb8lYi sRaleCIlgqoO1bE6sRxpZ0Wu1/8vhn6ra3rt7vs6VDjNK9yyiA8xo+z22ZrJU0Fg mOIYsLmXjqnY1DhG52yMQkNMjJXVAVeupos8+7I6SmoUNYvcOUFryVgmcNLaYzKn 6R3/nPPRyVVpvt5cTN6q2KG391hWD4/RMz2Ttbg5sMYHYQHVPbD12miC36AZ6Sfb vuyrtY/bPDq6eBbGrfRGBJEI1wnF+UFtzESqOdpr8OZ7Jv72mMjdvX883L3FpQZ7 d1pQHwfIgTbjC9o+s+bAb1U6U+bFjwfz0LwNtMbRnXoAkr1pIK8Tqr4B8vyNwJTk GroERyFMsdtZYu6EdvQrFOA/0n3vbaBqNwRaETooLukg8yezkV40Dm4nrhhi7B9b 6nOWCRBPKDB/vdtFSsKQ =UVOp -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d330c1c.2010...@tilapin.org
Re: [DebianGIS-dev] qgis_1.4.0+12730-3.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 16:38:40 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:08:43PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:01:48 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: found 603986 1.4.0+12730-3.1 thanks Argh it breaks grass compatibility, please don't hint for testing, I'll follow with a proper upload soon. The difference between -3.1 and -4 is in debian/changelog and whitespace in debian/rules. Nothing else, as far as I can tell? Err, no qgis-plugin-grass now depends on grass640+42329 which is provided by current grass in squeeze. So did the NMU. What's your point again? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#609622: marked as done (unblock: update-manager/0.200.5)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:23:06 +0100 with message-id 20110116152306.go2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr and subject line Re: Bug#609622: unblock: update-manager/0.200.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #609622, regarding unblock: update-manager/0.200.5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 609622: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609622 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package update-manager Hi, update-manager 0.200.5 is a translation update that has been lead and uploaded to Sid before the Deep Freeze announce, but the unblock request has been forgotten. Since this package may be used for updating a system, especially for security purpose, the twenty up-to-date translations that are shipped in this version would really be an improvement to ease the upgrade for end user using graphical tools. Please note that according to popcon [0], around half of GNOME users may be concerned. 0: http://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=gnome-session%2Cupdate-managershow_vote=onwant_percent=onwant_legend=onwant_ticks=onfrom_date=to_date=hlght_date=date_fmt=%25Y-%25mbeenhere=1 Thanks in advance for considering this unblock, and thanks anyway if you choose not to accept this request (and sorry for having wasted your time if so). unblock update-manager/0.200.5 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (150, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.36-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 20:54:17 -0400, David Prévot wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package update-manager Also why does this need en_AU, en_CA, en_GB translations? Seriously? (begrudgingly) unblocked. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Re: unblock request for pgdesigner 1.2.17-2
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:22:24 +0100, Pierre Chifflier wrote: Hi, pgdesigner 1.2.17-2 has just been uploaded to sid, and closes an RC bug affecting squeeze. I've managed to backport only the fix from the svn repository and make a minimal patch Care to explain the debian/rules and debian/control changes? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: please migrate mhonarc package to testing
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 20:25:05 -0800, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: Not touching package due to block request by freeze (contact debian-release if update is needed) This mhonarc release fixes multiple security problems. Please propagate it everywhere. http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/mhonarc diffstat: 61 files changed, 1502 insertions(+), 657 deletions(-) Is all of that necessary to fix the security issues? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#610056: marked as done (unblock: bind9/9.7.2.dfsg.P3-1.1)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:28:17 +0100 with message-id 20110116152817.gs2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr and subject line Re: Bug#610056: unblock: bind9/9.7.2.dfsg.P3-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #610056, regarding unblock: bind9/9.7.2.dfsg.P3-1.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 610056: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610056 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package bind9 Another fix for debconf translation (not the latest...). unblock bind9/9.7.2.dfsg.P3-1.1 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 08:24:16 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package bind9 Another fix for debconf translation (not the latest...). unblock bind9/9.7.2.dfsg.P3-1.1 . signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#610059: marked as done (unblock: clamav/0.96.5+dfsg-1.1)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:29:32 +0100 with message-id 20110116152932.gt2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr and subject line Re: Bug#610059: unblock: clamav/0.96.5+dfsg-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #610059, regarding unblock: clamav/0.96.5+dfsg-1.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 610059: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610059 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package clamav Yet another broken debconf translation fixed. unblock clamav/0.96.5+dfsg-1.1 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 08:36:00 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package clamav Yet another broken debconf translation fixed. unblock clamav/0.96.5+dfsg-1.1 . signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#610076: marked as done (unblock: nss/3.12.8-2)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:30:35 +0100 with message-id 20110116153035.gu2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr and subject line Re: Bug#610076: unblock: nss/3.12.8-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #610076, regarding unblock: nss/3.12.8-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 610076: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610076 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package nss I know this is probably not the right time for this, and I apologize, but I only started actively backporting my packages recently. This new version contains a small change to make backports for lenny not require any change besides a new changelog entry. As I do expect nss updates to squeeze that would also need to be pushed to lenny-backports, it will make my work easier. Thanks. unblock nss/3.12.8-2 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash diff -Nru nss-3.12.8/debian/changelog nss-3.12.8/debian/changelog --- nss-3.12.8/debian/changelog 2010-10-07 08:51:49.0 +0200 +++ nss-3.12.8/debian/changelog 2011-01-14 16:15:41.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +nss (3.12.8-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * debian/rules: Fallback to DEB_BUILD_ARCH when dpkg-architecture does't +support DEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS. + * debian/control: Lower build depends on dpkg-dev to (= 1.13.19), which +was the value before starting to use DEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS. + + -- Mike Hommey gland...@debian.org Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:07:35 +0100 + nss (3.12.8-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. diff -Nru nss-3.12.8/debian/control nss-3.12.8/debian/control --- nss-3.12.8/debian/control 2010-10-07 08:20:56.0 +0200 +++ nss-3.12.8/debian/control 2011-01-14 16:15:41.0 +0100 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Maintainers of Mozilla-related packages pkg-mozilla-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Uploaders: Mike Hommey gland...@debian.org -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7.0.50~), dpkg-dev (= 1.15.4), libnspr4-dev (= 4.8.6), zlib1g-dev, libsqlite3-dev (= 3.3.9) +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7.0.50~), dpkg-dev (= 1.13.19), libnspr4-dev (= 4.8.6), zlib1g-dev, libsqlite3-dev (= 3.3.9) Standards-Version: 3.9.1.0 Homepage: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/ Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-mozilla/nss.git diff -Nru nss-3.12.8/debian/rules nss-3.12.8/debian/rules --- nss-3.12.8/debian/rules 2010-10-07 08:20:56.0 +0200 +++ nss-3.12.8/debian/rules 2011-01-14 16:15:41.0 +0100 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ MOD_MINOR_VERSION := $(word 2, $(subst ., ,$(UPSTREAM_VERSION))) MOD_PATCH_VERSION := $(word 3, $(subst ., ,$(UPSTREAM_VERSION))) -ifeq (64,$(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS)) +ifneq (,$(filter 64 alpha amd64 ia64 s390x,$(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS 2 /dev/null || dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH))) USE_64 := USE_64=1 else USE_64 := ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 10:49:18 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package nss I know this is probably not the right time for this, and I apologize, but I only started actively backporting my packages recently. This new version contains a small change to make backports for lenny not require any change besides a new changelog entry. As I do expect nss updates to squeeze that would also need to be pushed to lenny-backports, it will make my work easier. Sorry, but not right now. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#610104: marked as done (unblock: postgrey/1.32-6.1)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:31:32 +0100 with message-id 20110116153132.gv2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr and subject line Re: Bug#610104: unblock: postgrey/1.32-6.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #610104, regarding unblock: postgrey/1.32-6.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 610104: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610104 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package postgrey And another broken debconf translation fixed. unblock postgrey/1.32-6.1 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 14:26:16 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package postgrey And another broken debconf translation fixed. unblock postgrey/1.32-6.1 . signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#609622: unblock: update-manager/0.200.5
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:17:48 -0400, David Prévot wrote: Is there a proper way to edit already uploaded changelog? Uploading a new version. So not necessary (and not really welcome right now). Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Is #606794 critical enough to be fixed in lenny?
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 18:24 +0100, Roland Gruber wrote: my package ldap-account-manager has a rc bug (606794) and I would like to ask you if this needs to be fixed in lenny or if I can just wait until squeeze is out (where it is already fixed). The bug in the lenny package version leads to a question about a modified configuration file on a package upgrade. This question is asked although the file was not modified by the user. It cannot be eliminated by a fix in a new package version because the error already exists on the machine when the lenny version is installed. So the impact on the user is quite low. There is just an unnecessary question. Yes, this looks worth fixing in lenny. Please could you send a debdiff of your proposed change? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1295193225.23434.705.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#610146: pu: package mumble/1.1.4-4+lenny1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 610146 + lenny confirmed Bug #610146 [release.debian.org] pu: package mumble/1.1.4-4+lenny1 Added tag(s) confirmed and lenny. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 610146: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610146 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12951935126315.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#610146: pu: package mumble/1.1.4-4+lenny1
tag 610146 + lenny confirmed thanks On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 18:01 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote: I want to fix both issues described in #609923 The permissions of /etc/mumble-server.ini SHOULD be fixed in the next point release, but I want to ask, if I should also add the patch for the not complete purge of the mumble-server package. As you can see, for both issues just a quite small patchset is needed. Assuming that the debdiff would be basically identical to the unstable debdiff in #609923, please go ahead. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1295193447.23434.727.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#610075: marked as done (unblock: moodle/1.9.9.dfsg2-2.1)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:01:05 +0100 with message-id 20110116160105.gy2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr and subject line Re: Bug#610075: unblock: moodle/1.9.9.dfsg2-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #610075, regarding unblock: moodle/1.9.9.dfsg2-2.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 610075: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610075 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package moodle Yet another NMU to fix a broken debconf translation unblock moodle/1.9.9.dfsg2-2.1 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 10:48:49 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package moodle Yet another NMU to fix a broken debconf translation unblock moodle/1.9.9.dfsg2-2.1 . signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#610115: marked as done (unblock: update-inetd/4.38+nmu1)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:00:11 +0100 with message-id 20110116160011.gx2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr and subject line Re: Bug#610115: unblock: update-inetd/4.38+nmu1 has caused the Debian Bug report #610115, regarding unblock: update-inetd/4.38+nmu1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 610115: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610115 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package update-inetd Another broken encoding fixed unblock update-inetd/4.38+nmu1 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 14:57:13 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package update-inetd Another broken encoding fixed unblock update-inetd/4.38+nmu1 . signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#610142: marked as done (unblock: nbd/2.9.16-7.1)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:01:49 +0100 with message-id 20110116160149.gz2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr and subject line Re: Bug#610142: unblock: nbd/2.9.16-7.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #610142, regarding unblock: nbd/2.9.16-7.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 610142: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610142 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package nbd Yet another fixed encoding for a debconf translation. unblock nbd/2.9.16-7.1 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 17:37:51 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package nbd Yet another fixed encoding for a debconf translation. unblock nbd/2.9.16-7.1 . signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#610061: marked as done (unblock: ddclient/3.8.0-11.3)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:04:11 +0100 with message-id 20110116160411.ga2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr and subject line Re: Bug#610061: unblock: ddclient/3.8.0-11.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #610061, regarding unblock: ddclient/3.8.0-11.3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 610061: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610061 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package ddclient Yet another broken debconf translation fixed. unblock ddclient/3.8.0-11.3 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 08:47:45 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package ddclient Yet another broken debconf translation fixed. unblock ddclient/3.8.0-11.3 . signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#610065: marked as done (unblock: halevt/0.1.6.2-1.4)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:05:01 +0100 with message-id 20110116160501.gb2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr and subject line Re: Bug#610065: unblock: halevt/0.1.6.2-1.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #610065, regarding unblock: halevt/0.1.6.2-1.4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 610065: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610065 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package halevt Yet another broken debconf translation fixed. unblock halevt/0.1.6.2-1.4 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 09:05:36 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package halevt Yet another broken debconf translation fixed. unblock halevt/0.1.6.2-1.4 . signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#610096: marked as done (unblock: ocsinventory-agent/1.1.1-2.3)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:05:35 +0100 with message-id 20110116160535.gc2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr and subject line Re: Bug#610096: unblock: ocsinventory-agent/1.1.1-2.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #610096, regarding unblock: ocsinventory-agent/1.1.1-2.3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 610096: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610096 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package ocsinventory-agent Another broken debconf translation fixed unblock ocsinventory-agent/1.1.1-2.3 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 13:06:54 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package ocsinventory-agent Another broken debconf translation fixed unblock ocsinventory-agent/1.1.1-2.3 . signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#610139: marked as done (unblock: xmail/1.27-1.1)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:06:14 +0100 with message-id 20110116160614.gd2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr and subject line Re: Bug#610139: unblock: xmail/1.27-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #610139, regarding unblock: xmail/1.27-1.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 610139: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610139 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package xmail Yet another fixed encoding for a debconf translation unblock xmail/1.27-1.1 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 17:36:03 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package xmail Yet another fixed encoding for a debconf translation unblock xmail/1.27-1.1 . signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Seeking advice regarding an update for geda-gaf package
Hello, There is a upstream patch for geda-gaf packaged that fixes an arbitrary code execution issue: http://git.gpleda.org/?p=gaf.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=16b3d32fcf8458389a491aed9437be835131b4b9 here is the bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/geda-gaf/+bug/700194 So, if I apply that patch, would that grant a freeze exception ? Also, is it alright to also have those changes accepted in a freeze exception: 1) Bumping Standards-Version to 3.9.1 2) Changed versioned Conflicts to Breaks. (Please see the this diff: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-electronics/geda-gaf.git;a=commitdiff;h=40f6c660335f5ed1b0f6d8a48b9b379e16131f80 ) Please CC me on replies, since I am not on the -release mailing list. -- أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) Digital design engineer GPG KeyID: 0xEDDDA1B7 GPG Fingerprint: 8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8 B176 BC19 6A94 EDDD A1B7 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#610108: marked as done (unblock: setserial/2.17-45.3)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:09:41 + with message-id 1295197781.23434.1115.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#610108: unblock: setserial/2.17-45.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #610108, regarding unblock: setserial/2.17-45.3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 610108: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610108 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package setserial And another fixed debconf translation unblock setserial/2.17-45.3 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 14:45 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Please unblock package setserial And another fixed debconf translation Unblocked. Regards, Adam ---End Message---
Bug#610110: marked as done (unblock: slbackup-php/0.3-2.2)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:08:48 + with message-id 1295197728.23434.1108.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#610110: unblock: slbackup-php/0.3-2.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #610110, regarding unblock: slbackup-php/0.3-2.2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 610110: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610110 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package slbackup-php Another fixed broken encoding. unblock slbackup-php/0.3-2.2 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 14:50 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Please unblock package slbackup-php Another fixed broken encoding. Unblocked. Regards, Adam ---End Message---
Bug#610113: marked as done (unblock: typo3-dummy/4.3.0-4.1)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:07:54 + with message-id 1295197674.23434.1101.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#610113: unblock: typo3-dummy/4.3.0-4.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #610113, regarding unblock: typo3-dummy/4.3.0-4.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 610113: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610113 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package typo3-dummy Another broken encoding fixed. unblock typo3-dummy/4.3.0-4.1 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 14:55 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Please unblock package typo3-dummy Another broken encoding fixed. Unblocked. Regards, Adam ---End Message---
Bug#610074: marked as done (unblock: iog/1.03-3.5)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:12:50 + with message-id 1295197970.23434.1136.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#610074: unblock: iog/1.03-3.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #610074, regarding unblock: iog/1.03-3.5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 610074: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610074 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package iog Guess what? Yet another one fixed broken debconf translation..:-) unblock iog/1.03-3.5 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 10:48 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Please unblock package iog Guess what? Yet another one fixed broken debconf translation..:-) Unblocked. Regards, Adam ---End Message---
Bug#610094: marked as done (unblock: nvidia-cg-toolkit/2.1.0017.deb1+nmu3)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:11:57 + with message-id 1295197917.23434.1129.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#610094: unblock: nvidia-cg-toolkit/2.1.0017.deb1+nmu3 has caused the Debian Bug report #610094, regarding unblock: nvidia-cg-toolkit/2.1.0017.deb1+nmu3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 610094: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610094 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package nvidia-cg-toolkit One more broken debconf translation fixed unblock nvidia-cg-toolkit/2.1.0017.deb1+nmu3 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 13:02 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Please unblock package nvidia-cg-toolkit One more broken debconf translation fixed Unblocked. Regards, Adam ---End Message---
Bug#610100: marked as done (unblock: poker-network/1.7.7-3.2)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:10:52 + with message-id 1295197852.23434.1122.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#610100: unblock: poker-network/1.7.7-3.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #610100, regarding unblock: poker-network/1.7.7-3.2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 610100: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610100 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package poker-network Another fix for a broken debconf translation. unblock poker-network/1.7.7-3.2 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 13:26 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Please unblock package poker-network Another fix for a broken debconf translation. Unblocked. Regards, Adam ---End Message---
Bug#610054: marked as done (unblock: bandwidthd/2.0.1+cvs20090917-4.1)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:13:48 + with message-id 1295198028.23434.1143.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#610054: unblock: bandwidthd/2.0.1+cvs20090917-4.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #610054, regarding unblock: bandwidthd/2.0.1+cvs20090917-4.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 610054: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610054 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package bandwidthd This NMU fixes encoding of a debconf translation (see https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/01/msg00288.html). unblock bandwidthd/2.0.1+cvs20090917-4.1 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 08:18 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Please unblock package bandwidthd This NMU fixes encoding of a debconf translation (see https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/01/msg00288.html). Unblocked. Regards, Adam ---End Message---
Re: Bug#609096: Buffer overflow in xdigger with long argv[0]
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:27:11PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 12:18 +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 09:10:53PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
This change looked a little odd:
[...]
+ case TON_SCHRITT:
+- strcat(name, /step.au);
++ snprintf(name, sizeof(name), %s/step.au, XDIGGER_LIB_DIR);
++ strncat(name, /step.au);
+ break;
Oops! The strncat() should not be there, I'll prepare a new upload.
+ case TON_STEINE:
+- strcat(name, /stone.au);
++ snprintf(name, sizeof(name), %s/stone.au, XDIGGER_LIB_DIR);
+ break;
Why have the filenames changed from foo.au to XDIGGER_LIB_DIR/foo.au?
They haven't changed :) A couple of lines above that, the name variable
is initialized to XDIGGER_LIB_DIR, so the strcat() that was there just
added foo.au to it. The snprintf() does both.
Ah, I see.
I've corrected the patch to remove the strncat() that I'd put there before
deciding to change it to snprintf() :)
[...]
Have you verified whether the addition of ${misc:Depends} makes any
practical difference to the generated binary packages, rather than
simply quietening lintian?
Actually, it does not make any difference; I'll remove it.
Thanks.
Here it is.
Were the update to xdigger.desktop and the addition of
debian/source/format intentional?
Well, the update to xdigger.desktop was done in a sweeping change by
Paul Wise (pabs) two and a half years ago; I don't know why he didn't
mention it in the changelog. That was before xdigger was removed from
unstable and testing, and before there were any thoughts of preparing
a Lenny-only upload.
Should I document it in the changelog, or revert it from the Subversion
repository?
One or the other. :-)
I documented it, since the change did seem kind of useful.
If so, why aren't they mentioned in
the changelog? fwiw, given that the default source format is not going
to change in lenny, the source/format change is at best a no-op.
As to the default source format, I initially tried to convert it to
3.0 (quilt), but then Ansgar Burchardt kindly reminded me that you would
not really allow this as a stable update :) So I reverted the 3.0 changes
and placed 1.0 as the source format name; I could remove it if you'd like,
no problem, and quite understandable.
Ansgar was correct. :-) It's technically a no-op; I'm not going to
complain (too) loudly if you leave it in.
Okay, removed.
Here's the new debdiff; thanks for your time!
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@freebsd.org r...@cpan.org
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
If this sentence were in Chinese, it would say something else.
diffstat for xdigger_1.0.10-13 xdigger_1.0.10-13+lenny1
debian/README.source | 17 +
debian/patches/buffers | 238 +
xdigger-1.0.10/debian/changelog| 13
xdigger-1.0.10/debian/patches/config |5
xdigger-1.0.10/debian/patches/dont-create-highscore|5
xdigger-1.0.10/debian/patches/escape-hyphen-in-manpage |5
xdigger-1.0.10/debian/patches/series |1
xdigger-1.0.10/debian/patches/start-level-on-move |5
xdigger-1.0.10/debian/rules|5
xdigger-1.0.10/debian/xdigger.desktop |2
10 files changed, 293 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff -u xdigger-1.0.10/debian/changelog xdigger-1.0.10/debian/changelog
--- xdigger-1.0.10/debian/changelog
+++ xdigger-1.0.10/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+xdigger (1.0.10-13+lenny1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Team upload.
+ * Paul Wise made xdigger.desktop a valid file by adding ArcadeGame
+as a category.
+ * Add the buffers patch to guard against lots of buffer overflows,
+including the one reported in the BTS. Closes: #609096
+ * Add DEP 3 descriptive headers to the rest of the patches.
+ * Use the quilt patch/unpatch targets in a bit more robust way and
+add a README.source file describing the use of quilt.
+
+ -- Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:53:30 +0200
+
xdigger (1.0.10-13) unstable; urgency=low
* Add /var/games dir, used in postinst (Closes: #496340)
diff -u xdigger-1.0.10/debian/xdigger.desktop
xdigger-1.0.10/debian/xdigger.desktop
--- xdigger-1.0.10/debian/xdigger.desktop
+++ xdigger-1.0.10/debian/xdigger.desktop
@@ -6,3 +6,3 @@
Icon=xdigger
-Categories=Game;
+Categories=Game;ArcadeGame;
Terminal=false
diff -u xdigger-1.0.10/debian/rules xdigger-1.0.10/debian/rules
--- xdigger-1.0.10/debian/rules
+++ xdigger-1.0.10/debian/rules
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
export DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture
Bug#610146: pu: package mumble/1.1.4-4+lenny1
Am 16.01.2011 16:57, schrieb Adam D. Barratt: tag 610146 + lenny confirmed thanks On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 18:01 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote: I want to fix both issues described in #609923 The permissions of /etc/mumble-server.ini SHOULD be fixed in the next point release, but I want to ask, if I should also add the patch for the not complete purge of the mumble-server package. As you can see, for both issues just a quite small patchset is needed. Assuming that the debdiff would be basically identical to the unstable debdiff in #609923, please go ahead. Thanks, uploaded! The patch is equal (just a little bit hunky), but I also updated my email address in debian/control with this upload, because the old @web.de address does not exist anymore. -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#610216: unblock: chromium-browser/6.0.472.63~r59945-5
On 01/16/2011 03:46 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: Don't these things have CVE IDs? Not yet. Cheers, Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Bug#609096: Buffer overflow in xdigger with long argv[0]
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 20:38 +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: Here's the new debdiff; thanks for your time! Thanks for that. Two small things: +- strcat(strcpy(croom, ROOM: ), slevel_number); [...] ++ snprintf(croom, sizeof(croom), ROOM: %s, slevel_number); The new version has one fewer space than the original; I guessed that the double space might be so that the string aligns with LIVES: . +- strcpy(localhost, gethostbyname(localhost)-h_name); +- strcpy(xhost, gethostbyname(xhost)-h_name); ++ snprintf(localhost, sizeof(localhost), gethostbyname(localhost)-h_name); ++ snprintf(xhost, sizeof(xhost), gethostbyname(xhost)-h_name); Those should probably be strncpys, or have an explicit %s format string. +xdigger (1.0.10-13+lenny1) unstable; urgency=low s/unstable/stable/ Okay, I lied; it was three things. :) With the above changes, please feel free to upload (bearing in mind that the deadline for inclusion in the next point release is tomorrow). Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1295205901.23434.1952.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#610146: pu: package mumble/1.1.4-4+lenny1
tag 610146 + pending thanks On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 19:46 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote: Am 16.01.2011 16:57, schrieb Adam D. Barratt: tag 610146 + lenny confirmed thanks On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 18:01 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote: I want to fix both issues described in #609923 [...] Assuming that the debdiff would be basically identical to the unstable debdiff in #609923, please go ahead. Thanks, uploaded! Flagged for acceptance at the next dinstall; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1295206195.23434.1984.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#610146: pu: package mumble/1.1.4-4+lenny1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 610146 + pending Bug #610146 [release.debian.org] pu: package mumble/1.1.4-4+lenny1 Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 610146: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610146 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129520624724328.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: mydms_1.7.0-1+lenny1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: base-files_5lenny9_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mumble_1.1.4-4+lenny2_i386.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1peygu-0003u5...@franck.debian.org
Re: RFS: hugs98 (NMU, RC bugfix)
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:08:13 +0100, Felix Geyer debfx-...@fobos.de wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU of the package hugs98. The upload would fix this RC bug: http://bugs.debian.org/608220 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hugs98/hugs98_98.200609.21-5.2.dsc Hi Felix; Please discuss with the release team (in CC) whether your upload is OK for squeeze. If they approve it I (or someone else) can sponsor the NMU. Release team: diffstat is big because autoconf rewrites all of configure. Other than that, the interesting change is --- hugs98-98.200609.21/debian/rules +++ hugs98-98.200609.21/debian/rules @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ # This has to be exported to make some magic below work. export DH_OPTIONS +# Ensure that LDFLAGS is empty as the build system can't handle commas. +LDFLAGS := + CONFIG_DIRS := . packages/network/ packages/Cabal/tests/HSQL/ \ packages/ALUT/ packages/GLUT/ packages/OpenAL/ \ packages/OpenGL/ src/unix/ d pgpcGY9KuXx5q.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: unblock request for pgdesigner 1.2.17-2
On 01/16/2011 04:25 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:22:24 +0100, Pierre Chifflier wrote: Hi, pgdesigner 1.2.17-2 has just been uploaded to sid, and closes an RC bug affecting squeeze. I've managed to backport only the fix from the svn repository and make a minimal patch Care to explain the debian/rules and debian/control changes? Sure. Short version: It's the minimal code required to compile the code after the patch Full version: pgdesigner is distributed with sources, bytecode for gambas and an executable file which is an archive of the bytecode with a loader. While previously I did not have to compile anything (the distributed code was ok), since I have to include a 5-lines patch I have to rebuild the file. Since the build changes lots of binary files this creates a huge diff with all the binary files, and I tried to avoid that. So the changes are doing two things: - adding the build-deps and calling the gambas compiler - the lines to save the binary files are a quick hack to save the distributed binaries (which are included in the .orig.tar.gz) and avoid a failure when running debuild twice (unable to generate diff for binary files). This was done to generate a minimal diff which changes only source files and is easy to review. BR, Pierre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d3353f4.80...@debian.org
Re: Is #606794 critical enough to be fixed in lenny?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Adam,
Am 16.01.2011 16:53, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
Yes, this looks worth fixing in lenny. Please could you send a debdiff
of your proposed change?
I built a new version that includes the fix for 606794.
Please find the debdiff and 2.3.0-2 diff.gz attached.
Thanks in advance for your support.
- --
Best regards
Roland
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk0zVrEACgkQq/ywNCsrGZ6TYgCdH7EOHc1fphmQtQ4EXHxr8nm/
CuEAnjETV0rGQ9joB7IdnvzqMLHbJzzR
=O2En
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
File lists identical (after any substitutions)
No differences were encountered between the conffiles files
Config files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
db_input [-low ldap-account-manager/passwd || true-]
[-db_go-]
[-db_input-] medium ldap-account-manager/restart-webserver || true
Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
Installed-Size: [-11346-] {+11342+}
Version: [-2.3.0-1-] {+2.3.0-2+}
Postinst files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
-
db_get [-ldap-account-manager/passwd-]
[-passwd=$RET-]
[- perl -pi -e s/password: .*/password: $passwd/g
/etc/ldap-account-manager/config.cfg-]
[-db_get-] ldap-account-manager/config-webserver
No differences were encountered between the postrm files
Templates files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
--
Template: [-ldap-account-manager/passwd-]
[-Type: string-]
[-Default: lam-]
[-Description: Master configuration password (clear text):-]
[- The configuration profiles are secured by a master password.-]
[- You will need it to create and delete profiles. As default it is-]
[- set to lam and can be changed directly in LAM.-]
[-Description-cs.UTF-8: Hlavnà konfiguraÄnà heslo (neÅ¡ifrovaný text):-]
[- KonfiguraÄnà profily jsou chránÄny hlavnÃm heslem. Toto heslo budete
potÅebovat pÅi vytváÅenà a mazánà profilů. Výchozà hodnota je lam a
můžete ji zmÄnit kdykoliv pozdÄji pÅÃmo v LAM.-]
[-Description-de.UTF-8: Hauptpasswort für die Konfiguration (im Klartext):-]
[- Die Konfigurationsprofile werden über ein Hauptpasswort gesichert. Es wird
benötigt um Profile anzulegen und zu löschen. Der Standardwert dafür ist
lam und kann innerhalb von LAM geändert werden.-]
[-Description-fr.UTF-8: Mot de passe principal (en clair)Â :-]
[- Les profils de configuration sont protégés par un mot de passe principal.
Vous en aurez besoin pour créer et effacer des profils. Sa valeur par défaut
est « lam » et vous pourrez le modifier directement dans LAM.-]
[-Description-it.UTF-8: Password di configurazione (in chiaro):-]
[- I profili di configurazione sono sicuri grazie a una password, questa
password è necessaria per creare e rimuovere i profili. La password
predefinita è lam e può essere cambiata direttamente da LAM.-]
[-Description-nl.UTF-8: Meester-configuratiewachtwoord (niet versleuteld):-]
[- De configuratieprofielen worden beveiligd met een meestwachtwoord. U heeft
dit wachtwoord nodig om profielen aan te maken en te verwijderen. De
standaardwaarde is 'lam' en kan rechtstreeks in LAM veranderd worden.-]
[-Description-pt.UTF-8: Password para a configuração principal (texto
simples):-]
[- Os perfis de configuração são protegidos por uma palavra-chave principal.
Irá necessitar dela para criar e apagar perfis. Por omissão, esta
palavra-chave é lam e pode ser alterada directamente no LAM.-]
[-Description-pt_BR.UTF-8: Senha mestra de configuração (texto plano):-]
[- Os perfis de configuração são protegidos por uma senha mestra. Você
precisará dela para criar e remover perfis. Como padrão ela está definida
como lam e pode ser mudada diretamente no LAM.-]
[-Description-sv.UTF-8: Lösenord för huvudkonfigurationen (klartext):-]
[- Konfigurationsprofilerna är säkrade av ett huvudlösenord. Du kommer att
behöva det för att skapa och ta bort profiler. Som standard är det inställt
till lam och kan ändras direkt i LAM.-]
[-Description-vi.UTF-8: Máºt khẩu cấu hình chủ (chữ rõ):-]
[- Những há» sÆ¡ cấu hình Äựơc bảo máºt bằng máºt khẩu chủ.
Bạn cần thiết nó Äá» tạo hay xóa há» sÆ¡. Máºt khẩu mặc
Äá»nh là « lam » mà có thá» Äược thay Äá»i trá»±c tiếp trong
BQT.-]
[--]
[-Template:-] ldap-account-manager/restart-webserver
ldap-account-manager_2.3.0-2.diff.gz
Description: application/gzip
debdiff.txt.sig
Description: Binary data
ldap-account-manager_2.3.0-2.diff.gz.sig
Description: Binary data
Re: Bug#608413: Possible patch for libio-socket-inet6-perl?
Hi Julien On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 04:02:24PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 09:43:51 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Hi On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 03:00:20PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:50:42 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: I said on IRC the debian/rules change was wrong, and for the rest I'd like an ack/review from a perl person, which I'm not. I don't know enough about sockets and ipv6 to make real judgement, but: Julien, on the other side I got confirmation from Julien Blache in #608413, that the backported change from the diff 2.54 to 2.55 would work again with the cricket setup. That's fine, but this change does not contain the fix for https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=55901 (inet_pton / inet_ntop import warnings) which I remember myself and which was very annoying at least, so I'd rather opt for moving 2.65 to testing (giving some code review from another more knowledgable person). I have prepared the NMU for 2.65 with the change dh_clean - dh_prep instead of using dh_clean -k. But we still need a review regarding ipv6 changes from a knowledgable person ;-) Please go back to dh_clean -k, and upload ASAP with urgency=high. Ok, no other changes done apart from the dh_clean -k call in the install target. I have uploaded it now with urgency high (directly without delay queue). Bests Salvatore diff -u libio-socket-inet6-perl-2.65/debian/changelog libio-socket-inet6-perl-2.65/debian/changelog --- libio-socket-inet6-perl-2.65/debian/changelog +++ libio-socket-inet6-perl-2.65/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +libio-socket-inet6-perl (2.65-1.1) unstable; urgency=high + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Revert changes to the dh_clean call in the install target: use dh_prep -k. + * Set urgency to high as requested by the release team. + + -- Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org Sun, 16 Jan 2011 21:22:09 +0100 + libio-socket-inet6-perl (2.65-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release (closes: Bug#575531) diff -u libio-socket-inet6-perl-2.65/debian/rules libio-socket-inet6-perl-2.65/debian/rules --- libio-socket-inet6-perl-2.65/debian/rules +++ libio-socket-inet6-perl-2.65/debian/rules @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ install: dh_testdir dh_testroot - dh_clean + dh_clean -k dh_installdirs $(MAKE) install PREFIX=$(TMP)/usr signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: hugs98 (NMU, RC bugfix)
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 16:19:11 -0400, David Bremner wrote: On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:08:13 +0100, Felix Geyer debfx-...@fobos.de wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU of the package hugs98. The upload would fix this RC bug: http://bugs.debian.org/608220 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hugs98/hugs98_98.200609.21-5.2.dsc Hi Felix; Please discuss with the release team (in CC) whether your upload is OK for squeeze. If they approve it I (or someone else) can sponsor the NMU. Release team: diffstat is big because autoconf rewrites all of configure. Other than that, the interesting change is --- hugs98-98.200609.21/debian/rules +++ hugs98-98.200609.21/debian/rules @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ # This has to be exported to make some magic below work. export DH_OPTIONS +# Ensure that LDFLAGS is empty as the build system can't handle commas. +LDFLAGS := + CONFIG_DIRS := . packages/network/ packages/Cabal/tests/HSQL/ \ packages/ALUT/ packages/GLUT/ packages/OpenAL/ \ packages/OpenGL/ src/unix/ That doesn't seem to be the interesting change. Debian's dpkg-buildpackage doesn't set LDFLAGS. Also, why wasn't this sent to the bug? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#608413: Possible patch for libio-socket-inet6-perl?
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 21:57:12 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Ok, no other changes done apart from the dh_clean -k call in the install target. I have uploaded it now with urgency high (directly without delay queue). Unblocked, thanks. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#609096: Buffer overflow in xdigger with long argv[0]
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 07:25:01PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 20:38 +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: Here's the new debdiff; thanks for your time! Thanks for that. Two small things: +- strcat(strcpy(croom, ROOM: ), slevel_number); [...] ++ snprintf(croom, sizeof(croom), ROOM: %s, slevel_number); The new version has one fewer space than the original; I guessed that the double space might be so that the string aligns with LIVES: . Oops. True. Fixed. +- strcpy(localhost, gethostbyname(localhost)-h_name); +- strcpy(xhost, gethostbyname(xhost)-h_name); ++ snprintf(localhost, sizeof(localhost), gethostbyname(localhost)-h_name); ++ snprintf(xhost, sizeof(xhost), gethostbyname(xhost)-h_name); Those should probably be strncpys, or have an explicit %s format string. Argh. True. Fixed; don't know what I was thinking. +xdigger (1.0.10-13+lenny1) unstable; urgency=low s/unstable/stable/ Oops :) Okay, I lied; it was three things. :) With the above changes, please feel free to upload (bearing in mind that the deadline for inclusion in the next point release is tomorrow). Thanks! Well, since I'm not a full DD yet, and xdigger doesn't fall under my DM rights, I hereby throw myself at the mercy of the pkg-games DD's - or any DD who's reading this and has the time to check my work as uploaded to http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xdigger/xdigger_1.0.10-13+lenny1.dsc :) Once again, many thanks to Adam and Ansgar for helping me through this and pointing out my mistakes and misassumptions! G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@freebsd.org r...@cpan.org PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 This sentence was in the past tense. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Is #606794 critical enough to be fixed in lenny?
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 21:36 +0100, Roland Gruber wrote: Am 16.01.2011 16:53, schrieb Adam D. Barratt: Yes, this looks worth fixing in lenny. Please could you send a debdiff of your proposed change? I built a new version that includes the fix for 606794. Please find the debdiff and 2.3.0-2 diff.gz attached. fwiw, I meant a source debdiff, i.e. debdiff foo.dsc bar.dsc. I've interdiffed the .diff.gzs to check the changes, but a source debdiff would have been more convenient. Please go ahead with the upload (bearing in mind that the deadline for acceptance into the next point release is tomorrow). Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1295213968.23434.2671.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: [SRM] perl lenny upload (CVE-2010-2761 CVE-2010-4410 CVE-2010-4411 CVE-2010-1974)
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 21:51 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 09:28:09AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: I'll try to get a perl lenny upload (#606995) in stable NEW by Monday. [...] perl (5.10.0-19lenny3) stable; urgency=low . * [SECURITY] CVE-2010-2761 CVE-2010-4410 CVE-2010-4411: fix CGI.pm MIME boundary and multiline header vulnerabilities. (Closes: #606995) * [SECURITY] CVE-2010-1974: Update to Safe-2.25, fixing code injection and execution vulnerabilities. (Closes: #582978) [...] Please let me know if I can upload both or just one of these to stable-proposed-updates. Based on your testing, including both patches will be fine. Thanks for working on this. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1295215559.23434.2777.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
tor update for squeeze
Hey, Tor is releasing version 0.2.1.29, a release with lots of security fixes, both minor and not so minor, including one for CVE-2011-0427 (heap overflow bug, potential remote code execution), a denial of service involving compression bombs, and zeroing out of cryptographic keys after use to resist cold boot attacks somewhat better. I went over all the commits but, as already discussed on IRC, I ended up with a version that was almost equivalent to 0.2.1.29 anyway, modulo several comment updates, copyright statement updates, autoconf fu and a very few fixes of which I'm not entirely sure they aren't security relevant either. Also, most of upstream's 0.2.1.28 was already in our tor 0.2.1.26-XX. There seemed to be an agreement that putting 0.2.1.29 into squeeze was the smartest course of action, especially with an eye to making future security updates easier. Therefore I have uploaded a tor package 0.2.1.29-1 to unstable. If you still agree with this course of action please unblock. Cheers, weasel -- | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110116223606.gz8...@anguilla.noreply.org
Re: [SRM] Updating ia32-libs* in lenny
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 03:14:02PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Sun, January 16, 2011 14:41, Philipp Kern wrote: On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 01:30:30AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Sun, January 16, 2011 00:28, Philipp Kern wrote: On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 07:07:50PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: ia32-libs-gtk: Looks ok'ish. I'll do a final review once it hits the queue, though, so please go ahead. On its way to the queue. is there a reason why there are old sources of glib2.0 and pango1.0 included? This is because of the way the current packaging scripts work and I didn't change anything besides refresh the packages. The security archive contains the -5+lenny1 version and the regular archive contains -6. The script fetches both sources but as you'll see in the end only the -6 binary ends up in the package. So it's basically the extra source that is cached. Yep, that's ok then because I'm able to fetch it from another archive (security) to verify it. Flagged for accept on the next dinstall. You can go ahead with the upload of the beast (ia32-libs), too. Kind regards and thanks Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: please allow freevo 1.9.0-9
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 15:38:37 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 17:24:25 +0100, A Mennucc wrote: Dear jcristau and d-release all, the current version of freevo in testing is 1.9.0-7 ; it is affected by RC bugs #607921 python-freevo: package fails to upgrade properly from lenny. #606782 freevo messes with /home So the change to debian/freevo.default is ugly. The point of these files are to set variables used by the init script, not be random shell scripts, see policy 9.3.2. I've decided to unblock that version as the new bug seems better than the old one. Let me know if I should file it in the bts as a reminder, or if you'll take care of it. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#608220: RFS: hugs98 (NMU, RC bugfix)
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 23:40:43 +0100, Felix Geyer wrote: I've upload a new version to Debian Mentors without the LDFLAGS change and CCed the bug. Well you've still not sent a patch to the bug, afaict. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: hugs98 (NMU, RC bugfix)
On 16.01.2011 22:12, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 16:19:11 -0400, David Bremner wrote: Hi Felix; Please discuss with the release team (in CC) whether your upload is OK for squeeze. If they approve it I (or someone else) can sponsor the NMU. Release team: diffstat is big because autoconf rewrites all of configure. Other than that, the interesting change is --- hugs98-98.200609.21/debian/rules +++ hugs98-98.200609.21/debian/rules @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ # This has to be exported to make some magic below work. export DH_OPTIONS +# Ensure that LDFLAGS is empty as the build system can't handle commas. +LDFLAGS := + CONFIG_DIRS := . packages/network/ packages/Cabal/tests/HSQL/ \ packages/ALUT/ packages/GLUT/ packages/OpenAL/ \ packages/OpenGL/ src/unix/ That doesn't seem to be the interesting change. Debian's dpkg-buildpackage doesn't set LDFLAGS. Also, why wasn't this sent to the bug? Cheers, Julien I've upload a new version to Debian Mentors without the LDFLAGS change and CCed the bug. Felix -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d3373eb.9090...@fobos.de
t-p-u for sendmail possible?
Dear release team, regarding my mail from the Fri, 7 Jan 2011, may I ask if anybody could take a look at it and tell me if the changes would be acceptable? Kind regards Harald Jenny -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110116234137.ge3...@harald-has.a-little-linux-box.at
Bug#610272: pu: package refpolicy/2:0.2.20100524-6
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 10:06 +1100, Russell Coker wrote: The following patch fixes many issues with the SE Linux policy that were discovered after the release of Lenny. It also supports using the Squeeze kernel which is really useful for virtual servers that have Lenny DomU and Squeeze Dom0. The basic standard for a stable update is that it fixes important bugs and does so in the most minimal way possible. I'm not sure that 114 files changed, 2188 insertions(+), 280 deletions(-) comprising 2.5 years of uploads really meets that criteria, particularly for what may be the last point release for lenny as the stable release. Is it possible to isolate the changes relevant to the Squeeze kernel use and any other particularly important fixes? diff -u refpolicy-0.0.20080702/debian/changelog refpolicy-0.0.20080702/debian/changelog --- refpolicy-0.0.20080702/debian/changelog +++ refpolicy-0.0.20080702/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,276 @@ +refpolicy (2:0.0.20080702-21) unstable; urgency=low Even if we were to accept all of the changes from the previous unstable uploads, the new upload would be to stable so there's a new stanza missing here. (Also, the version number in the subject is intended to relate to the version of the package in stable, not the one you have installed). Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/129556.23434.3245.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Bug#609096: Buffer overflow in xdigger with long argv[0]
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net writes: With the above changes, please feel free to upload (bearing in mind that the deadline for inclusion in the next point release is tomorrow). Thanks! Well, since I'm not a full DD yet, and xdigger doesn't fall under my DM rights, I hereby throw myself at the mercy of the pkg-games DD's - or any DD who's reading this and has the time to check my work as uploaded to http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xdigger/xdigger_1.0.10-13+lenny1.dsc :) I just uploaded xdigger. Thanks for your work :) Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/878vykjtpm@marvin.43-1.org
Bug#609727: marked as done (permission to upload sympa/6.0.1+dfsg-4 to testing proposed updates)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:09:19 +
with message-id 1295222960.23434.3295.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#609727: permission to upload sympa/6.0.1+dfsg-4 to
testing proposed updates
has caused the Debian Bug report #609727,
regarding permission to upload sympa/6.0.1+dfsg-4 to testing proposed updates
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
609727: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609727
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi Release Team,
This upload would fix 2 bugs:
- #605355: Portuguese debconf translations update.
- #606704: RC bug during install.
The diff is attached.
Regards,
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index df736c5..d12b9b1 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
+sympa (6.0.1+dfsg-4) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+ [ Stefan Hornburg (Racke) ]
+ * Update Portuguese debconf translations (Closes: #605355,
+thanks to Miguel Figueiredo)
+
+ [ Emmanuel Bouthenot ]
+ * Fix the empty 'supported_lang' option from a newly generated sympa.conf
+when no locales are installed. Rearrange recommends and dependencies so
+that sympa will depends on all DB backends libs. This will make
+installation more robust regarding the multiples combinations of DB
+backends and debconf priorities (Closes: #606704).
+
+ -- Emmanuel Bouthenot kol...@debian.org Sun, 09 Jan 2011 12:20:39 +
+
sympa (6.0.1+dfsg-3) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
[ Stefan Hornburg (Racke) ]
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 448de68..045b344 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -5,11 +5,10 @@ Maintainer: Debian Sympa team pkg-sympa-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Uploaders: Stefan Hornburg (Racke) ra...@linuxia.de, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk, Emmanuel Bouthenot kol...@debian.org
Build-Depends: cdbs (= 0.4.70~),
devscripts (= 2.10.7~),
- dh-buildinfo,
debhelper (= 6),
+ dh-buildinfo,
perl-suid,
libdbi-perl (= 1.06),
- libdbd-mysql-perl | libdbd-pg-perl | libdbd-sqlite3-perl | libdbd-sqlite2-perl,
libarchive-zip-perl (= 1.05),
libmailtools-perl (= 1.51),
libmsgcat-perl (= 1.0),
@@ -39,11 +38,11 @@ Homepage: http://www.sympa.org/
Package: sympa
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${perl:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, ${cdbs:Depends}, libfile-copy-recursive-perl, libnet-netmask-perl, libterm-progressbar-perl, libmime-lite-html-perl
+Depends: ${perl:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, ${cdbs:Depends}
Replaces: wwsympa
Provides: wwsympa
Conflicts: wwsympa
-Recommends: logrotate, doc-base, mysql-server | postgresql | sqlite3 | sqlite, locales, ca-certificates
+Recommends: logrotate, doc-base, mysql-server | postgresql, locales, ca-certificates
Suggests: apache2 | httpd-cgi, openssl (= 0.9.5a), libapache2-mod-fcgid, libsoap-lite-perl
Description: Modern mailing list manager
Sympa is a scalable and highly customizable modern mailing list manager
diff --git a/debian/control.in b/debian/control.in
index 8720717..453c857 100644
--- a/debian/control.in
+++ b/debian/control.in
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Depends: ${perl:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, ${cdbs:Depends}
Replaces: wwsympa
Provides: wwsympa
Conflicts: wwsympa
-Recommends: logrotate, doc-base, mysql-server | postgresql | sqlite3 | sqlite, locales, ca-certificates
+Recommends: logrotate, doc-base, mysql-server | postgresql, locales, ca-certificates
Suggests: apache2 | httpd-cgi, openssl (= 0.9.5a), libapache2-mod-fcgid, libsoap-lite-perl
Description: Modern mailing list manager
Sympa is a scalable and highly customizable modern mailing list manager
diff --git a/debian/po/pt.po b/debian/po/pt.po
index eba7056..7b5c3f7 100644
--- a/debian/po/pt.po
+++ b/debian/po/pt.po
@@ -7,13 +7,15 @@ msgstr
Project-Id-Version: sympa\n
Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: sy...@packages.debian.org\n
POT-Creation-Date: 2010-04-12 15:33+0200\n
-PO-Revision-Date: 2008-04-19 16:27+0100\n
+PO-Revision-Date: 2010-11-29 08:19+\n
Last-Translator: Miguel Figueiredo el...@debianpt.org\n
Language-Team: Portuguese tra...@debianpt.org\n
Language: pt\n
MIME-Version:
Re: Bug#609096: Buffer overflow in xdigger with long argv[0]
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 00:48 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net writes: With the above changes, please feel free to upload (bearing in mind that the deadline for inclusion in the next point release is tomorrow). Thanks! Well, since I'm not a full DD yet, and xdigger doesn't fall under my DM rights, I hereby throw myself at the mercy of the pkg-games DD's - or any DD who's reading this and has the time to check my work as uploaded to http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xdigger/xdigger_1.0.10-13+lenny1.dsc :) I just uploaded xdigger. Thanks for your work :) Flagged for acceptance at the next dinstall; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1295223225.23434.3312.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#609727: permission to upload sympa/6.0.1+dfsg-4 to testing proposed updates
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:07:30PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
With that proviso, please go ahead.
Thanks, uploaded!
M.
--
Emmanuel Bouthenot
mail: kolter@{openics,debian}.orggpg: 4096R/0x929D42C3
xmpp: kol...@im.openics.org irc: kolter@{freenode,oftc}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110117000504.gd9...@openics.org
Re: Bug#608220: RFS: hugs98 (NMU, RC bugfix)
Felix Geyer debfx-...@fobos.de (17/01/2011): I didn't realize that you were talking about the patch itself. Attaching it now. Thanks, sponsored. Thanks for spotting I failed to get it fixed in the first place, too. KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: xdigger_1.0.10-13+lenny1_multi.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: wireshark_1.0.2-3+lenny12_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: wireshark_1.0.2-3+lenny12_alpha.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: wireshark_1.0.2-3+lenny12_arm.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: wireshark_1.0.2-3+lenny12_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: wireshark_1.0.2-3+lenny12_hppa.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: wireshark_1.0.2-3+lenny12_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: wireshark_1.0.2-3+lenny12_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: wireshark_1.0.2-3+lenny12_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: wireshark_1.0.2-3+lenny12_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: wireshark_1.0.2-3+lenny12_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: wireshark_1.0.2-3+lenny12_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: wireshark_1.0.2-3+lenny12_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ia32-libs-gtk_2.7+lenny1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libsmi_0.4.7+dfsg-0.2_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libsmi_0.4.7+dfsg-0.2_alpha.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libsmi_0.4.7+dfsg-0.2_arm.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libsmi_0.4.7+dfsg-0.2_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libsmi_0.4.7+dfsg-0.2_hppa.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libsmi_0.4.7+dfsg-0.2_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libsmi_0.4.7+dfsg-0.2_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libsmi_0.4.7+dfsg-0.2_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libsmi_0.4.7+dfsg-0.2_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libsmi_0.4.7+dfsg-0.2_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libsmi_0.4.7+dfsg-0.2_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libsmi_0.4.7+dfsg-0.2_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1peelj-0004vr...@franck.debian.org
Re: please migrate mhonarc package to testing
diffstat: 61 files changed, 1502 insertions(+), 657 deletions(-) Is all of that necessary to fix the security issues? No. However, I do not have the ability to isolate (and especially validate) just the security fixes. Additionally, it is conservative release that should not break any existing installations. Therefore my formal opinion as package maintainer is the entire 2.6.18 release should ship as the security update. Here are links to the release notes so you can decide for yourself. -Jeff http://www.mail-archive.com/mhonarc-dev@mhonarc.org/msg01372.html http://www.mail-archive.com/mhonarc-dev@mhonarc.org/msg01385.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=_SZXGW8EODmGxirirbe0gJfLiEEirBKS=K=i...@mail.gmail.com
Re: [Foo2zjs-maintainer] Processed: severity of 609761 is serious, tagging 609761
Hi Julien! On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:45:04 +0100, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: severity 609761 serious Bug #609761 [foo2zjs] foo2zjs depends on dc to work Severity set to 'serious' from 'critical' tags 609761 - squeeze Bug #609761 [foo2zjs] foo2zjs depends on dc to work Removed tag(s) squeeze. Mmm, I do not understand why removing the squeeze tag. I am perfectly fine with Didier's NMU (which IMHO should not have been delayed at all), which means that this bug will be fixed in 2 days: is this still a good timeframe for squeeze or should I (or Didier) upload a new version *now* (and better with urgency=high)? Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca pgp9NOGqY9oP7.pgp Description: PGP signature
please pre-approve libevent/1.4.13-stable-2 (was: Bug#609444: tmux hangs when closing the session on hurd)
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 09:49:34PM +0100, Romain Francoise wrote:
reassign 609444 libevent-1.4-2
severity 609444 important
quit
Justus Winter 4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de writes:
When the session is ended by closing the last shell within tmux,
tmux hangs.
Yes. This is a known bug in libevent's poll backend, which is used
on GNU/Hurd (and was used on Linux in tmux 1.4-2). It was fixed
upstream in libevent 2.0.10 and will be fixed in 1.4.15, the fix in
the patches-1.4 branch is here:
http://levent.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=levent/libevent;a=commit;h=f0ff7659f3128bb727a3ff380334eed3ceac2c0b
Can we get this patch backported in the Debian package? It makes
tmux unusable, as the server randomly hangs.
Thanks,
--
Romain Francoise rfranco...@debian.org
http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/
Release team, please pre-approve the following changeset for libevent to
fix a serious problem for tmux.
diff -Nru libevent-1.4.13-stable/debian/changelog
libevent-1.4.13-stable/debian/changelog
--- libevent-1.4.13-stable/debian/changelog 2011-01-17 18:30:01.0
+1100
+++ libevent-1.4.13-stable/debian/changelog 2011-01-17 18:26:47.0
+1100
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+libevent (1.4.13-stable-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Fix an issue where a signal socketpair doesn't get recreated if
+the event backend doesn't set event_reinit
+Closes: 609444
+ * Debian source format is 3.0 (quilt)
+Add 01-609444-fix-issue-with-socketpairs.patch
+
+ -- Anibal Monsalve Salazar ani...@debian.org Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:20:40
+1100
+
libevent (1.4.13-stable-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
diff -Nru
libevent-1.4.13-stable/debian/patches/01-609444-fix-issue-with-socketpairs.patch
libevent-1.4.13-stable/debian/patches/01-609444-fix-issue-with-socketpairs.patch
---
libevent-1.4.13-stable/debian/patches/01-609444-fix-issue-with-socketpairs.patch
1970-01-01 10:00:00.0 +1000
+++
libevent-1.4.13-stable/debian/patches/01-609444-fix-issue-with-socketpairs.patch
2011-01-17 18:15:07.0 +1100
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+From: Nick Mathewson ni...@torproject.org
+Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:09:58 + (-0400)
+Subject: Fix an issue with forking and signal socketpairs in select/poll
backends
+X-Git-Url:
http://levent.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=levent%2Flibevent;a=commitdiff_plain;h=f0ff7659f3128bb727a3ff380334eed3ceac2c0b
+
+Fix an issue with forking and signal socketpairs in select/poll backends
+
+Nicholas Marriott identifies an issue where a signal socketpair
+doesn't get recreated if the event backend doesn't set event_reinit.
+---
+
+diff --git a/event.c b/event.c
+index 74ba5c4..79d2be0 100644
+--- a/event.c
b/event.c
+@@ -279,9 +279,14 @@ event_reinit(struct event_base *base)
+ int res = 0;
+ struct event *ev;
+
++#if 0
++ /* Right now, reinit always takes effect, since even if the
++ backend doesn't require it, the signal socketpair code does.
++ */
+ /* check if this event mechanism requires reinit */
+ if (!evsel-need_reinit)
+ return (0);
++#endif
+
+ /* prevent internal delete */
+ if (base-sig.ev_signal_added) {
+@@ -294,7 +299,7 @@ event_reinit(struct event_base *base)
+ EVLIST_ACTIVE);
+ base-sig.ev_signal_added = 0;
+ }
+-
++
+ if (base-evsel-dealloc != NULL)
+ base-evsel-dealloc(base, base-evbase);
+ evbase = base-evbase = evsel-init(base);
diff -Nru libevent-1.4.13-stable/debian/patches/series
libevent-1.4.13-stable/debian/patches/series
--- libevent-1.4.13-stable/debian/patches/series1970-01-01
10:00:00.0 +1000
+++ libevent-1.4.13-stable/debian/patches/series2011-01-17
18:19:06.0 +1100
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+01-609444-fix-issue-with-socketpairs.patch
diff -Nru libevent-1.4.13-stable/debian/source/format
libevent-1.4.13-stable/debian/source/format
--- libevent-1.4.13-stable/debian/source/format 1970-01-01 10:00:00.0
+1000
+++ libevent-1.4.13-stable/debian/source/format 2009-11-23 21:30:16.0
+1100
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+3.0 (quilt)
diff -Nru libevent-1.4.13-stable/debian/source/options
libevent-1.4.13-stable/debian/source/options
--- libevent-1.4.13-stable/debian/source/options1970-01-01
10:00:00.0 +1000
+++ libevent-1.4.13-stable/debian/source/options2009-11-23
21:37:44.0 +1100
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+compression = bzip2
+compression-level = 9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
