Re: [digitalradio] Move away from PSK63 /31 in NBEMS?

2008-08-19 Thread Rick W.
Just to clear up a few things:

1. Is it correct that just because a mode is listed in the NBEMS mode 
list, does not mean that you could not use it with flarq as an ARQ mode?

Therefore, any of the modes could theoretically be used, even if not 
recommended or even if they might not work very well but flarq will ARQ 
any of them?

2. Could you explain how the MFSK modes are made more robust and yet can 
still work with other programs?

On another note, thanks for confirming what I suspected about the drift 
issue. I recently was told that I my preference for purchasing only TCXO 
rigs was overkill, even for VHF, but when you look at the ppm issues 
with modes such as MFSK, even a few Hz is a problem.

73,

Rick, KV9U


kh6ty wrote:
 PSK31 and PSK63 are still there for use in QSO's but neither mode is as good 
 as MFSK16 or MFSK32, or our new Thor modes, for ARQ messaging when high 
 static conditions on 80m or 40m exist, which is most of the time in the 
 summer or before and after a hurricane, so MFSK16 or MFSK32, wider, but the 
 same speeds as PSK31 and PSK63, are recommended for NBEMS messaging over 
 PSK31 and PSK63. The MFSK16 and MFSK32 modes are not your grandmother's MFSK 
 modes, but have been made more robust under static conditions on HF when 
 PSK63 and PSK31 get pulled off frequency by the AFC if there is a static 
 crash between ARQ transmissions. It was a tough decision not to include 
 PSK63 in the recommended NBEMS mode list, but the job of NBEMS is to 
 accomplish the most reliable messaging for any given speed, and the modified 
 MFSK modes are simply more reliable, although they are wider.

 For VHF messaging, PSK31 and PSK63 lose out again over DominoEx11 and 
 DominoEx22 at the same speed, because many VHF multimode transceivers have 
 no TCXO and drift too much to maintain tuning on 2 meters during an ARQ 
 transfer, whereas DominoEx has a wide tolerance to mistuning or drift, such 
 that no AFC is needed and provides a lower minimum S/N than the PSK modes at 
 the same speed.

 PSK31 and PSK63 are easier to recongnize among the background noise on VHF, 
 so it is often best to establish tuning with PSK41 or PSK63, check to see if 
 there is no adjacent frequency activity, and then switch to DominoEx for the 
 ARQ transfer.

 The popular IC-746Pro, for example, drifts 100 Hz between receiving and 
 start of transmitting, unless a TCXO is added, causing the loss of the first 
 few characters or words on PSK63, so I have switched our 2 meter digital net 
 from PSK63 to DominoEx.

 73, Skip KH6TY
 NBEMS Development Team


   



Re: [digitalradio] Move away from PSK63 /31 in NBEMS?

2008-08-19 Thread kh6ty
 1. Is it correct that just because a mode is listed in the NBEMS mode
 list, does not mean that you could not use it with flarq as an ARQ mode?

Yes, but some modes cannot be used as an ARQ mode due to either too much 
latency or ascii or control code support.  The only modes tested with flarq 
are DominoEx, MFSK16,32,64, PSK31,63,125,250, Thor (all speeds) and 
MT-63-2000. The latency of MT-63 is so great, only the fastest speed is 
enough to enable ARQ to work.


 Therefore, any of the modes could theoretically be used, even if not
 recommended or even if they might not work very well but flarq will ARQ
 any of them?

See above. Of the available modes for ARQ, the ones listed for NBEMS are the 
ones recommended for messaging. However, on VHF when signals are near the 
noise, it is sometimes easier to tune with PSK31 (because the idle carriers 
stand out more clearly against the noise background on the waterfall than 
the multi-tone modes) and then switch to MFSK16 or DominoEx11 without 
changing the tuning.


 2. Could you explain how the MFSK modes are made more robust and yet can
 still work with other programs?

We worked with ZL1BPU, one of the authors of MFSK16, to implement several 
enhancements, one of which is called puncturing, which averages the signal 
level and if a signal sample is significantly above the average, it is 
assumed to be a static burst and the AFC is momentarily disabled. The fldigi 
MFSK modes are compatible with MFSK16 or MFSK8 in other programs, but it is 
necessary to use fldigi in order to get the advantage of the enchancements.


 On another note, thanks for confirming what I suspected about the drift
 issue. I recently was told that I my preference for purchasing only TCXO
 rigs was overkill, even for VHF, but when you look at the ppm issues
 with modes such as MFSK, even a few Hz is a problem.

Generally, not on HF so much, as transceivers tend to have less drift on HF, 
especially on 80m and 40m, but definitely on VHF, where excessive drift can 
often be a serious problem for some digital modes.

73, Skip KH6TY
NBEMS Development Team



Re: [digitalradio] Move away from PSK63 /31 in NBEMS?

2008-08-19 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi all,

I would like to test one of these ARQ modes. Anyone around for a test on 40- or 
80m?  I am calling cq on 3585 usb in Thor right now. 

73 de LA5VNA Steinar 




kh6ty wrote:
 1. Is it correct that just because a mode is listed in the NBEMS mode
 list, does not mean that you could not use it with flarq as an ARQ mode?
 

 Yes, but some modes cannot be used as an ARQ mode due to either too much 
 latency or ascii or control code support.  The only modes tested with flarq 
 are DominoEx, MFSK16,32,64, PSK31,63,125,250, Thor (all speeds) and 
 MT-63-2000. The latency of MT-63 is so great, only the fastest speed is 
 enough to enable ARQ to work.

   
 Therefore, any of the modes could theoretically be used, even if not
 recommended or even if they might not work very well but flarq will ARQ
 any of them?
 

 See above. Of the available modes for ARQ, the ones listed for NBEMS are the 
 ones recommended for messaging. However, on VHF when signals are near the 
 noise, it is sometimes easier to tune with PSK31 (because the idle carriers 
 stand out more clearly against the noise background on the waterfall than 
 the multi-tone modes) and then switch to MFSK16 or DominoEx11 without 
 changing the tuning.

   
 2. Could you explain how the MFSK modes are made more robust and yet can
 still work with other programs?
 

 We worked with ZL1BPU, one of the authors of MFSK16, to implement several 
 enhancements, one of which is called puncturing, which averages the signal 
 level and if a signal sample is significantly above the average, it is 
 assumed to be a static burst and the AFC is momentarily disabled. The fldigi 
 MFSK modes are compatible with MFSK16 or MFSK8 in other programs, but it is 
 necessary to use fldigi in order to get the advantage of the enchancements.

   
 On another note, thanks for confirming what I suspected about the drift
 issue. I recently was told that I my preference for purchasing only TCXO
 rigs was overkill, even for VHF, but when you look at the ppm issues
 with modes such as MFSK, even a few Hz is a problem.
 

 Generally, not on HF so much, as transceivers tend to have less drift on HF, 
 especially on 80m and 40m, but definitely on VHF, where excessive drift can 
 often be a serious problem for some digital modes.

 73, Skip KH6TY
 NBEMS Development Team



 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.5/1620 - Release Date: 19.08.2008 
 06:04


   



[digitalradio] Move away from PSK63 /31 in NBEMS?

2008-08-18 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I note the new release of FL-Digi does not list PSK31 or 63 under
NBEMS modes.  I realize that Dave , Skip, and others never really
intended NBEMS to have much use on HF , hence PSK250/125, but was
wondering why the option of slower PSK modes has been removed.


-- 
Andy K3UK
www.obriensweb.com
(QSL via N2RJ)


Re: [digitalradio] Move away from PSK63 /31 in NBEMS?

2008-08-18 Thread Stelios Bounanos
 On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:04:22 -0400, Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 said:

 I note the new release of FL-Digi does not list PSK31 or 63 under
 NBEMS modes.  I realize that Dave , Skip, and others never really
 intended NBEMS to have much use on HF , hence PSK250/125, but was
 wondering why the option of slower PSK modes has been removed.

There is nothing special about the NBEMS modes submenu. It lists modes
that NBEMS users are likely to want to use, but nothing that is not also
available elsewhere in the main Op Mode menu -- it's just a
convenience.

I suppose you could use any of the modes that can handle the ARQ
protocol, including the slower PSK modes.


73,
Stelios, M0GLD.


-- 


Re: [digitalradio] Move away from PSK63 /31 in NBEMS?

2008-08-18 Thread kh6ty
I note the new release of FL-Digi does not list PSK31 or 63 under
 NBEMS modes.  I realize that Dave , Skip, and others never really
 intended NBEMS to have much use on HF , hence PSK250/125, but was
 wondering why the option of slower PSK modes has been removed.

Andy,

PSK31 and PSK63 are still there for use in QSO's but neither mode is as good 
as MFSK16 or MFSK32, or our new Thor modes, for ARQ messaging when high 
static conditions on 80m or 40m exist, which is most of the time in the 
summer or before and after a hurricane, so MFSK16 or MFSK32, wider, but the 
same speeds as PSK31 and PSK63, are recommended for NBEMS messaging over 
PSK31 and PSK63. The MFSK16 and MFSK32 modes are not your grandmother's MFSK 
modes, but have been made more robust under static conditions on HF when 
PSK63 and PSK31 get pulled off frequency by the AFC if there is a static 
crash between ARQ transmissions. It was a tough decision not to include 
PSK63 in the recommended NBEMS mode list, but the job of NBEMS is to 
accomplish the most reliable messaging for any given speed, and the modified 
MFSK modes are simply more reliable, although they are wider.

For VHF messaging, PSK31 and PSK63 lose out again over DominoEx11 and 
DominoEx22 at the same speed, because many VHF multimode transceivers have 
no TCXO and drift too much to maintain tuning on 2 meters during an ARQ 
transfer, whereas DominoEx has a wide tolerance to mistuning or drift, such 
that no AFC is needed and provides a lower minimum S/N than the PSK modes at 
the same speed.

PSK31 and PSK63 are easier to recongnize among the background noise on VHF, 
so it is often best to establish tuning with PSK41 or PSK63, check to see if 
there is no adjacent frequency activity, and then switch to DominoEx for the 
ARQ transfer.

The popular IC-746Pro, for example, drifts 100 Hz between receiving and 
start of transmitting, unless a TCXO is added, causing the loss of the first 
few characters or words on PSK63, so I have switched our 2 meter digital net 
from PSK63 to DominoEx.

73, Skip KH6TY
NBEMS Development Team