Laptop Fn key causes X (Gnome 2) to sleep immediately
Hello, I have a Lenovo X121e running Current with X and the Gnome desktop. Beside other issues[1] there is a strange behavior of Gnome-Desktop (and GDM too). When I press Fn without any additional key, the device immediately goes to sleep. As the X121e cannot resume properly from sleep, this forces me to reboot. This problem appears to be only exist when using Gnome / GDM. Pure X with TWM doesn't have this issue. I already tried to re-map the Fn key (I found in some mailing this might have the keycode 150) to a less dangerous key: $ xmodmap -e keycode 150 = Delete this brought no change. Has anyone an idea if Gnome re-maps the keys in some way or how I can disable this? At the moment this is the only blocker to use this Laptop for daily work, as I tend to accidently touch the Fn key more often than I want to reboot ;-) Thanks in advance kind regards, Matthias [1] http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=544740+551865+/usr/local/www/db/text/2013/freebsd-current/20130707.freebsd-current ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Laptop Fn key causes X (Gnome 2) to sleep immediately
Hello, I have a Lenovo X121e running Current with X and the Gnome desktop. Beside other issues[1] there is a strange behavior of Gnome-Desktop (and GDM too). When I press Fn without any additional key, the device immediately goes to sleep. As the X121e cannot resume properly from sleep, this forces me to reboot. This problem appears to be only exist when using Gnome / GDM. Pure X with TWM doesn't have this issue. I already tried to re-map the Fn key (I found in some mailing this might have the keycode 150) to a less dangerous key: $ xmodmap -e keycode 150 = Delete this brought no change. Has anyone an idea if Gnome re-maps the keys in some way or how I can disable this? At the moment this is the only blocker to use this Laptop for daily work, as I tend to accidently touch the Fn key more often than I want to reboot ;-) Thanks in advance kind regards, Matthias [1] http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=544740+551865+/usr/local/www/db/text/2013/freebsd-current/20130707.freebsd-current ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Tex Live vs. print/texlive-full (was Re: texlive and package updating)
Hello, On Sat, August 10, 2013 6:03 pm, Nikola PavloviÄ wrote: On 09/08/13 18:40, Tim Daneliuk wrote: I've given up on all OS distribution-based TexLive drops. I install texlive manually from their installer and then run tlmgr under cron control nightly to keep it up-to-date. I do this on FreeBSD (my primary dev and server platform) as well as all linux instances in my environment. It makes things a lot simpler. How do you manage dependency tracking errors? The last time I've installed it the way you do was on Slackware and since it doesn't do any dependency tracking there were no problems (as long as the binaries were in PATH). I can imagine ports and pkg tools on FreeBSD complaining about missing TeX packages, and AFAIK Debian based Linux distributions will certainly complain (I think there is a workaround, but it involves messing with dpkg). I am also curious about this one. Any guideline or special considerations regarding the use of the Tex Live distribution straight into FreeBSD would be very helpful. Or is it just a matter of following this: http://www.tug.org/texlive/quickinstall.html While previous texlive-full port seemed to work fine. I haven't been able to install it on new machines as it seems something is wrong with japanese/tex-ptex not able to figure out where kpathsea and zlib are, or something like that. It feels that it is stuck in some sort of transition between few ports to many ports to provide Tex Live in the Collection (speculating...). Any feedback on this would be appreciated! a. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Laptop Fn key causes X (Gnome 2) to sleep immediately
Hi! I'm glad someone else is seeing this! I have the same behaviour with KDE4 on my T60 and T400. If I go to run amiwm (because hey, Workbench is awesome!) it doesn't happen. .. and bah, I wish the resume worked for you. It works fine for me on T42i, T60, T400. -adrian On 15 August 2013 23:32, Matthias Petermann matth...@d2ux.org wrote: Hello, I have a Lenovo X121e running Current with X and the Gnome desktop. Beside other issues[1] there is a strange behavior of Gnome-Desktop (and GDM too). When I press Fn without any additional key, the device immediately goes to sleep. As the X121e cannot resume properly from sleep, this forces me to reboot. This problem appears to be only exist when using Gnome / GDM. Pure X with TWM doesn't have this issue. I already tried to re-map the Fn key (I found in some mailing this might have the keycode 150) to a less dangerous key: $ xmodmap -e keycode 150 = Delete this brought no change. Has anyone an idea if Gnome re-maps the keys in some way or how I can disable this? At the moment this is the only blocker to use this Laptop for daily work, as I tend to accidently touch the Fn key more often than I want to reboot ;-) Thanks in advance kind regards, Matthias [1] http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/**getmsg.cgi?fetch=544740+** 551865+/usr/local/www/db/text/**2013/freebsd-current/20130707.** freebsd-currenthttp://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=544740+551865+/usr/local/www/db/text/2013/freebsd-current/20130707.freebsd-current __**_ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questionshttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-** unsubscr...@freebsd.org freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: copying milllions of small files and millions of dirs
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:13:25AM -0700, aurfalien wrote: Is there a faster way to copy files over NFS? I would use find+cpio. This handles hard links, permissions, and in case of later runs, will not copy files if they already exist on the destination. # cd /source/dir # find . | cpio -pvdm /destination/dir -- Nicolas ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Vbox shared folders and freebsd guests
Hi,
Do shared folders from vbox hosts to freebsd guests work as i cant seem to
mount them? I have the guest additions installed fine.
s11 host
vbox@radical:~$ VBoxManage list runningvms
router {daa9e421-7730-4f77-b97c-d931c107e50d}
vbox@radical:~$ VBoxManage list runningvms -l| ggrep -iA 2 share
Shared folders:
Name: 'new', Host path: '/videos/new' (machine mapping), writable
vbox@radical:~$ uname -a
SunOS radical.intranet 5.11 11.1 i86pc i386 i86pc
bsd guest
[root@carrera /home/krad]# kldstat -v | grep -i vb
201 0x81c12000 22c77vboxguest.ko
(/boot/modules/vboxguest.ko)
500 pci/vboxguest
[root@carrera /home/krad]# ls -l /| grep mnt
drwxrwxrwx 13 root wheel 512 Aug 12 2012 mnt
[root@carrera /home/krad]# mount -t vboxsf new /mnt
mount: new: Operation not supported by device
[root@carrera /home/krad]# ps auxwww| grep VB
root 1204 0.0 0.1 32200 2832 ?? Ss9:19AM 0:00.16
/usr/local/sbin/VBoxService
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: where to start with PGP/GPG?
From cpgh...@cordula.ws Thu Aug 15 20:20:49 2013 On 08/15/13 14:16, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: I never needed to use pgp till now. So I'm not sure where to start. Is security/gnupg the way to go? Any other advice? security/gnupg + security/pinentry is the way to go. I wonder if pinentry should be made a required port for gnupg. This is because gpg2 --gen-keys refuses to run unless pinentry is installed. Perhaps this is up the maintaniner, but to me this sounds like a requirement. Anton ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FreeBSD 9.2
Thank you very much. I will wait for 9.2 release or switch to Linux which works but it is not hat I want it… On Aug 15, 2013, at 4:14 PM, Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org wrote: On 15 August 2013, at 06:37, ajtiM lum...@gmail.com wrote: How will be ATI supported in FreeBSD 9.2, please? I like bluetooth mouse. Is it supported? I try Linux Mint and it works perfect. I am downloading live CD for NetBSD (jibbed) and I will see how is works but I like to install FreeBSD (not double boot, just FreeBSD). See: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?28915479-B712-4ED0-A041-B75F2F59FECA Thats not a complete answer as I don't use any of the user interface stuff. However, it will give a starting point for you. I have updated my two newest minis to run 9.2 (latest candidate). Mitja http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Laptop Fn key causes X (Gnome 2) to sleep immediately
Hi Adrian, Zitat von Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org: Hi! I'm glad someone else is seeing this! I have the same behaviour with KDE4 on my T60 and T400. If I go to run amiwm (because hey, Workbench is awesome!) it doesn't happen. .. and bah, I wish the resume worked for you. It works fine for me on T42i, T60, T400. Thanks for your response. The fact it happens also in KDE appears interesting... so the root cause might exist in a component on top of pure X which is shared by Gnome and KDE. I will definitely do more investigation on this at the weekend. Hopefully some time suspend/resume will also work on the newer Lenovo models (I would be curious if the wakeup problem is Intel/KMS only or if also the NVidia models e.g. T430 NVS are affected). Kind regards, Matthias -- Matthias Petermann matth...@d2ux.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Laptop Fn key causes X (Gnome 2) to sleep immediately
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:25:41 +0200, Matthias Petermann wrote: Hi Adrian, Zitat von Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org: Hi! I'm glad someone else is seeing this! I have the same behaviour with KDE4 on my T60 and T400. If I go to run amiwm (because hey, Workbench is awesome!) it doesn't happen. .. and bah, I wish the resume worked for you. It works fine for me on T42i, T60, T400. Thanks for your response. The fact it happens also in KDE appears interesting... so the root cause might exist in a component on top of pure X which is shared by Gnome and KDE. I have tested a Lenovo R61i running Xfce, and I don't experience the strange behaviour desribed. However, using the xev event tester, the keycode for the Fn key is being displayed as 227, and the KeyPress event is held (!) until the key is released, which means KeyPress and KeyRelease happen immediately after each other. Because my IBM T60p is still in the ICU, I can't test this, but I would assume to get a similar result. Hopefully some time suspend/resume will also work on the newer Lenovo models (I would be curious if the wakeup problem is Intel/KMS only or if also the NVidia models e.g. T430 NVS are affected). It would also be nice if as much as possible would work on the older models (including the docking stations), because Thinkpads seem to live much longer (and therefore will probably many more years in productive use), compared to their crappy competitors on the laptop market. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Laptop Fn key causes X (Gnome 2) to sleep immediately
Hi, I also had problem with Fn key. I'm using Lenovo T430 and Enlightenment desktop environment. I resolved this issue by unbinding XF86Sleep in Enlightenment settings. Cheers, Grzegorz Blach ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
pkgng problem
Hi, I'm sure someone has had this before, but I can't find any reference to it. # pkg upgrade Updating repository catalogue digests.txz 100% 997KB 997.1KB/s 997.1KB/s 00:00 packagesite.txz 100% 5530KB 1.8MB/s 3.2MB/s 00:03 pkg: Invalid manifest format: mapping values are not allowed in this context Incremental update completed, 0 packages processed: 0 packages updated, 0 removed and 22568 added. pkg: No digest falling back on legacy catalog format packagesite repository catalogue is up-to-date, no need to fetch fresh copy Nothing to do This is from a machine freshly converted to pkgng. Any suggestions? Thanks, ==ml -- Michael W. Lucas - mwlu...@michaelwlucas.com, Twitter @mwlauthor http://www.MichaelWLucas.com/, http://blather.MichaelWLucas.com/ Absolute OpenBSD 2/e - http://www.nostarch.com/openbsd2e coupon code ILUVMICHAEL gets you 30% off helps me. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: pkgng problem
On 16/08/2013 13:43, Michael W. Lucas wrote: Hi, I'm sure someone has had this before, but I can't find any reference to it. # pkg upgrade Updating repository catalogue digests.txz 100% 997KB 997.1KB/s 997.1KB/s 00:00 packagesite.txz 100% 5530KB 1.8MB/s 3.2MB/s 00:03 pkg: Invalid manifest format: mapping values are not allowed in this context Incremental update completed, 0 packages processed: 0 packages updated, 0 removed and 22568 added. pkg: No digest falling back on legacy catalog format packagesite repository catalogue is up-to-date, no need to fetch fresh copy Nothing to do This is from a machine freshly converted to pkgng. Any suggestions? What repositories are you using? Please show us the result of: pkg -vv | sed -ne '/Repositories/,$p' I'd hazard a guess that the repository either had a bit of a flail when creating the catalogue, or it's running some ancient version of pkg. mapping values are not allowed in this context is an error message from libyaml, so you've got a +MANIFEST file (or the partial copy of it that gets incorporated into the repository catalogue) which it thinks contains a mapping ( a sequence of key : value pairs ) when the YAML parser was expecting an array or whatever. Cheers, Matthew ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ZFS Snapshots Not able to be accessed under .zfs/snapshot/name
On 08/15/2013 10:00 am, dweimer wrote: On 08/14/2013 9:43 pm, Shane Ambler wrote: On 14/08/2013 22:57, dweimer wrote: I have a few systems running on ZFS with a backup script that creates snapshots, then backs up the .zfs/snapshot/name directory to make sure open files are not missed. This has been working great but all of the sudden one of my systems has stopped working. It takes the snapshots fine, zfs list -t spnapshot shows the snapshots, but if you do an ls command, on the .zfs/snapshot/ directory it returns not a directory. part of the zfs list output: NAMEUSED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT zroot 4.48G 29.7G31K none zroot/ROOT 2.92G 29.7G31K none zroot/ROOT/91p5-20130812 2.92G 29.7G 2.92G legacy zroot/home 144K 29.7G 122K /home part of the zfs list -t snapshot output: NAMEUSED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT zroot/ROOT/91p5-20130812@91p5-20130812--bsnap 340K - 2.92G - zroot/home@home--bsnap 22K - 122K - ls /.zfs/snapshot/91p5-20130812--bsnap/ Does work at the right now, since the last reboot, but wasn't always working, this is my boot environment. if I do ls /home/.zfs/snapshot/, result is: ls: /home/.zfs/snapshot/: Not a directory if I do ls /home/.zfs, result is: ls: snapshot: Bad file descriptor shares I have tried zpool scrub zroot, no errors were found, if I reboot the system I can get one good backup, then I start having problems. Anyone else ever ran into this, any suggestions as to a fix? System is running FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p5 #1 r253764: Mon Jul 29 15:07:35 CDT 2013, zpool is running version 28, zfs is running version 5 I can say I've had this problem. Not certain what fixed it. I do remember I decided to stop snapshoting if I couldn't access them and deleted existing snapshots. I later restarted the machine before I went back for another look and they were working. So my guess is a restart without existing snapshots may be the key. Now if only we could find out what started the issue so we can stop it happening again. I had actually rebooted it last night, prior to seeing this message, I do know it didn't have any snapshots this time. As I am booting from ZFS using boot environments I may have had an older boot environment still on the system the last time it was rebooted. Backups ran great last night after the reboot, and I was able to kick off my pre-backup job and access all the snapshots today. Hopefully it doesn't come back, but if it does I will see if I can find anything else wrong. FYI, It didn't shutdown cleanly, so if this helps anyone find the issue, this is from my system logs: Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: fault virtual address = 0xa8 Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: fault code= supervisor write data, page not present Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: instruction pointer = 0x20:0x808b0562 Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: stack pointer = 0x28:0xff80002238f0 Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: frame pointer = 0x28:0xff8000223910 Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: current process = 1 (init) Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: trap number = 12 Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: panic: page fault Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: cpuid = 0 Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: KDB: stack backtrace: Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: #0 0x808ddaf0 at kdb_backtrace+0x60 Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: #1 0x808a951d at panic+0x1fd Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: #2 0x80b81578 at trap_fatal+0x388 Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: #3 0x80b81836 at trap_pfault+0x2a6 Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: #4 0x80b80ea1 at trap+0x2a1 Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: #5 0x80b6c7b3 at calltrap+0x8 Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: #6 0x815276da at zfsctl_umount_snapshots+0x8a Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: #7 0x81536766 at zfs_umount+0x76 Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: #8 0x809340bc at dounmount+0x3cc Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: #9 0x8093c101 at vfs_unmountall+0x71 Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: #10 0x808a8eae at kern_reboot+0x4ee Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: #11 0x808a89c0 at kern_reboot+0 Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: #12 0x80b81dab at amd64_syscall+0x29b Aug 14 22:08:04 cblproxy1 kernel: #13 0x80b6ca9b at Xfast_syscall+0xfb Well its
Asic Bitcoin Sales
= Asic-technologies.com http://www.asic-technologies.com/ = New Cheaper Prices - difficulty now 50M ! Visit Us USB Block Miners from ASICMINER now 0.58 BTC each !! FREE SHIPPING Mining board's supplied , Case, power supply , On-board heat sink , USB connectors. Ready assembled All the boards are linked together , With one main controller. Easy to Install Software (Disk Provided) Simple Plug and play. = Asic-technologies.com http://www.asic-technologies.com/ = ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: pkgng problem
Thanks, Matt. # pkg -vv | sed -ne '/Repositories/,$p' Repositories: packagesite: url: http://pkg-test.freebsd.org/pkg-test-freebsd:9:x86:32/latest key: enabled: yes mirror_type: SRV Also: # pkg -v 1.1.4 ==ml -- Michael W. Lucas - mwlu...@michaelwlucas.com, Twitter @mwlauthor http://www.MichaelWLucas.com/, http://blather.MichaelWLucas.com/ Absolute OpenBSD 2/e - http://www.nostarch.com/openbsd2e coupon code ILUVMICHAEL gets you 30% off helps me. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Myrinet 10Gb odd behavior
Hi, I've been suspecting my NIC is not up to par and notice this in the logs every few minutes; Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: slice 0 struck? ring state: Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: tx.req=1914503981 tx.done=1914503810, tx.queue_active=0 Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: tx.activate=0 tx.deactivate=0 Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: pkt_done=1824019832 fw=1824019931 Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: Watchdog reset! Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: NIC did not reboot, not resetting Could tis be effecting throughput? My card is a Myri-10G-PCIE-8A I did install the Myrinet dev tools for FreeBSD and ran myri_info which yields; pci-dev at 05:00.0 vendor:product(rev)=14c1:0008(00) behind bridge root-port: 00:03.0 8086:3c08 (x8.1/x16.3) Myri-10G-PCIE-8A -- Link x8 EEPROM String-spec: MAC=00:60:dd:45:73:23 SN=413665 PWR=100 PC=10G-PCIE-8A-R PN=09-03852 XFI=AEL1010 TAG=ze_tools-1_4_45 EEPROM MCP, PRESENT, length = 103384, crc=0x119daf46 ETHZ::1.4.45 2009/08/22 18:57:06 self extracting firmware Bundle: exec_len=72144, PCI-ROM-len = 31232 Running MCP: ETH ::1.4.55 -P- 2012/04/21 01:48:34 myri10ge firmware Any insights are appreciated. - aurf ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: pkgng problem
On 16/08/2013 16:02, Michael W. Lucas wrote: Thanks, Matt. # pkg -vv | sed -ne '/Repositories/,$p' Repositories: packagesite: url: http://pkg-test.freebsd.org/pkg-test-freebsd:9:x86:32/latest key: enabled: yes mirror_type: SRV Also: # pkg -v 1.1.4 Well, looks like both of those are up-to-date versions. I wonder if the pkg-test build system threw a wobbly at all on it's i386 builder? Bapt is on holiday or I'd ask him. Cheers, Matthew ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Myrinet 10Gb odd behavior
Forgot to mention my loader.conf; if_mxge_load=YES mxge_ethp_z8e_load=YES mxge_eth_z8e_load=YES mxge_rss_ethp_z8e_load=YES mxge_rss_eth_z8e_load=YES I blindly added these w/o thinking what they do. Should I simply only load the first line? - aurf On Aug 16, 2013, at 8:18 AM, aurfalien wrote: Hi, I've been suspecting my NIC is not up to par and notice this in the logs every few minutes; Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: slice 0 struck? ring state: Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: tx.req=1914503981 tx.done=1914503810, tx.queue_active=0 Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: tx.activate=0 tx.deactivate=0 Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: pkt_done=1824019832 fw=1824019931 Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: Watchdog reset! Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: NIC did not reboot, not resetting Could tis be effecting throughput? My card is a Myri-10G-PCIE-8A I did install the Myrinet dev tools for FreeBSD and ran myri_info which yields; pci-dev at 05:00.0 vendor:product(rev)=14c1:0008(00) behind bridge root-port: 00:03.0 8086:3c08 (x8.1/x16.3) Myri-10G-PCIE-8A -- Link x8 EEPROM String-spec: MAC=00:60:dd:45:73:23 SN=413665 PWR=100 PC=10G-PCIE-8A-R PN=09-03852 XFI=AEL1010 TAG=ze_tools-1_4_45 EEPROM MCP, PRESENT, length = 103384, crc=0x119daf46 ETHZ::1.4.45 2009/08/22 18:57:06 self extracting firmware Bundle: exec_len=72144, PCI-ROM-len = 31232 Running MCP: ETH ::1.4.55 -P- 2012/04/21 01:48:34 myri10ge firmware Any insights are appreciated. - aurf ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: pkgng problem
Matt, Another data point on this: Machines converted to pkgng a couple weeks ago can install new packages just fine despite showing the same error. And it looks like they download the new repo information: # pkg install sysrc Updating repository catalogue digests.txz 100% 997KB 997.1KB/s 997.1KB/s 00:00 packagesite.txz 100% 5530KB 1.4MB/s 1.9MB/s 00:04 pkg: Invalid manifest format: mapping values are not allowed in this contex Incremental update completed, 0 packages processed: 8292 packages updated, 1115 removed and 129 added. pkg: No digest falling back on legacy catalog format packagesite repository catalogue is up-to-date, no need to fetch fresh copy The following 1 packages will be installed: Installing sysrc: 5.2 The installation will require 39 kB more space 15 kB to be downloaded Proceed with installing packages [y/N]: y sysrc-5.2.txz 100% 16KB 15.8KB/s 15.8KB/s 00:00 Checking integrity... done [1/1] Installing sysrc-5.2... done Machines upgraded to pkgng this week, using the same script as I used a couple weeks ago, cannot install packages. # pkg install sysrc Updating repository catalogue digests.txz 100% 997KB 997.1KB/s 997.1KB/s 00:00 packagesite.txz 100% 5530KB 2.7MB/s 1.5MB/s 00:02 pkg: Invalid manifest format: mapping values are not allowed in this context Incremental update completed, 0 packages processed: 0 packages updated, 0 removed and 22568 added. pkg: No digest falling back on legacy catalog format packagesite repository catalogue is up-to-date, no need to fetch fresh copy pkg: No packages matching 'sysrc' has been found in the repositories Not sure if this supports the bad repo theory, but it's interesting. Thanks, ==ml -- Michael W. Lucas - mwlu...@michaelwlucas.com, Twitter @mwlauthor http://www.MichaelWLucas.com/, http://blather.MichaelWLucas.com/ Absolute OpenBSD 2/e - http://www.nostarch.com/openbsd2e coupon code ILUVMICHAEL gets you 30% off helps me. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
VPN where local private address collide
Let's say we're using MPD on FreeBSD at both ends of a link here, using a VPN to connect two LANs. (The use of MPD is negotiable). One LAN uses the address range 192.168.1.0/24 and the other uses the address range, er, 192.168.1.0/24. However hard you try to avoid this, it's going to happen. Let's also assume there is no way either end can change its range. NO WAY. Just don't go there. I've found I can still get away with this if the actual used IP addresses don't conflict, but it's not ideal. I'm not even 100% on why it works at all. I've heard of a mythical solution called VPN NAT. It makes sense; just use NAT to map one range on to something completely different and away you go. Hosts at either end would be none the wiser. Has anyone actually done this, and if so, how? Thanks, Frank. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: pkgng problem
Have you done a pkg update first, just in case you needed to pull in a pkgng update? -adrian ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Laptop Fn key causes X (Gnome 2) to sleep immediately
... xf86sleep as a keypress id? -adrian On 16 August 2013 04:48, Grzegorz Blach ma...@roorback.net wrote: Hi, I also had problem with Fn key. I'm using Lenovo T430 and Enlightenment desktop environment. I resolved this issue by unbinding XF86Sleep in Enlightenment settings. Cheers, Grzegorz Blach ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: pkgng problem
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:23:41AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: Have you done a pkg update first, just in case you needed to pull in a pkgng update? Yep, tried that. ==ml -- Michael W. Lucas - mwlu...@michaelwlucas.com, Twitter @mwlauthor http://www.MichaelWLucas.com/, http://blather.MichaelWLucas.com/ Absolute OpenBSD 2/e - http://www.nostarch.com/openbsd2e coupon code ILUVMICHAEL gets you 30% off helps me. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: VPN where local private address collide
On 16. aug. 2013, at 19:17, Frank Leonhardt freebsd-...@fjl.co.uk wrote: Has anyone actually done this, and if so, how? This is wrong on so many levels, and you'll have to work around all og them. Yes, you can use nat, but what about adress-resolution? And so on. If it's a specific thing you need to work - a spesific server for example - nat can work, but if you need general bridging, best to avoid conflicts. Note that there are alternatives, such as L2-bridging rather than L3. If you explain a bit more of the setup, and what you need to work, it'd be easier to suggest something. Right now, we know bits of the setup, but not really what problem(s) you're trying to solve. Terje ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: VPN where local private address collide
On 16 August 2013 20:17, Frank Leonhardt freebsd-...@fjl.co.uk wrote: Let's say we're using MPD on FreeBSD at both ends of a link here, using a VPN to connect two LANs. (The use of MPD is negotiable). One LAN uses the address range 192.168.1.0/24 and the other uses the address range, er, 192.168.1.0/24. However hard you try to avoid this, it's going to happen. Let's also assume there is no way either end can change its range. NO WAY. Just don't go there. Such a stupid statement. No private IP's are engraved in stone, esp a /24. How many days does it take you to reconfigure the hosts to connect to the shared resources - which is what I believe would make you say there is no way either end can change its range? It's a /24 and shared resources can be accessed by running an internal DNS server, for crying out loud! -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Laptop Fn key causes X (Gnome 2) to sleep immediately
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 11:24:51 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: ... xf86sleep as a keypress id? Yes, there are many of XF86... key symbols that can be associated to key codes. Probably this is some setting in Gnome or KDE (but not in other environments). You can use xev to check which symbol is associated to which key (or key combination, if this creates a new unique key event). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Laptop Fn key causes X (Gnome 2) to sleep immediately
Hi, Am 16.08.2013 13:58, schrieb Polytropon: I have tested a Lenovo R61i running Xfce, and I don't experience the strange behaviour desribed. However, using the xev event tester, the keycode for the Fn key is being displayed as 227, and the KeyPress event is held (!) until the key is released, which means KeyPress and KeyRelease happen immediately after each other. Because my IBM T60p is still in the ICU, I can't test this, but I would assume to get a similar result. thanks, I just used xev (with X and only TWM). It reports the Fn key as keycode 150. Looks like this is different across the Thinkpad models. It would also be nice if as much as possible would work on the older models (including the docking stations), because Thinkpads seem to live much longer (and therefore will probably many more years in productive use), compared to their crappy competitors on the laptop market. :-) Agree :-) Regards, Matthias ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Laptop Fn key causes X (Gnome 2) to sleep immediately
Hi, a short update on this. I just found out: at least in Gnome 2 the behavior can be prevented by using the gconf-settings tool, changing the value of the key /apps/gnome-power-manager/buttons/suspend from suspend to nothing. Seems like some ubuntu users had the same issue as I found the workaround there. Kind regards, Matthias Am 16.08.2013 08:44, schrieb Adrian Chadd: Hi! I'm glad someone else is seeing this! I have the same behaviour with KDE4 on my T60 and T400. If I go to run amiwm (because hey, Workbench is awesome!) it doesn't happen. .. and bah, I wish the resume worked for you. It works fine for me on T42i, T60, T400. -adrian On 15 August 2013 23:32, Matthias Petermann matth...@d2ux.org mailto:matth...@d2ux.org wrote: Hello, I have a Lenovo X121e running Current with X and the Gnome desktop. Beside other issues[1] there is a strange behavior of Gnome-Desktop (and GDM too). When I press Fn without any additional key, the device immediately goes to sleep. As the X121e cannot resume properly from sleep, this forces me to reboot. This problem appears to be only exist when using Gnome / GDM. Pure X with TWM doesn't have this issue. I already tried to re-map the Fn key (I found in some mailing this might have the keycode 150) to a less dangerous key: $ xmodmap -e keycode 150 = Delete this brought no change. Has anyone an idea if Gnome re-maps the keys in some way or how I can disable this? At the moment this is the only blocker to use this Laptop for daily work, as I tend to accidently touch the Fn key more often than I want to reboot ;-) Thanks in advance kind regards, Matthias [1] http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=544740+551865+/usr/local/www/db/text/2013/freebsd-current/20130707.freebsd-current ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org mailto:freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Laptop Fn key causes X (Gnome 2) to sleep immediately
Right, but this sounds like some bug to send upstream. Or at least patch in our port(s) for this stuff. What keyboard / laptop has the key code '150' map to 'go to sleep' ? -adiran On 16 August 2013 17:09, Matthias Petermann matth...@d2ux.org wrote: Hi, a short update on this. I just found out: at least in Gnome 2 the behavior can be prevented by using the gconf-settings tool, changing the value of the key /apps/gnome-power-manager/buttons/suspend from suspend to nothing. Seems like some ubuntu users had the same issue as I found the workaround there. Kind regards, Matthias Am 16.08.2013 08:44, schrieb Adrian Chadd: Hi! I'm glad someone else is seeing this! I have the same behaviour with KDE4 on my T60 and T400. If I go to run amiwm (because hey, Workbench is awesome!) it doesn't happen. .. and bah, I wish the resume worked for you. It works fine for me on T42i, T60, T400. -adrian On 15 August 2013 23:32, Matthias Petermann matth...@d2ux.org wrote: Hello, I have a Lenovo X121e running Current with X and the Gnome desktop. Beside other issues[1] there is a strange behavior of Gnome-Desktop (and GDM too). When I press Fn without any additional key, the device immediately goes to sleep. As the X121e cannot resume properly from sleep, this forces me to reboot. This problem appears to be only exist when using Gnome / GDM. Pure X with TWM doesn't have this issue. I already tried to re-map the Fn key (I found in some mailing this might have the keycode 150) to a less dangerous key: $ xmodmap -e keycode 150 = Delete this brought no change. Has anyone an idea if Gnome re-maps the keys in some way or how I can disable this? At the moment this is the only blocker to use this Laptop for daily work, as I tend to accidently touch the Fn key more often than I want to reboot ;-) Thanks in advance kind regards, Matthias [1] http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=544740+551865+/usr/local/www/db/text/2013/freebsd-current/20130707.freebsd-current ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Myrinet 10Gb odd behavior - SOLVED
On Aug 16, 2013, at 8:47 AM, aurfalien wrote: Forgot to mention my loader.conf; if_mxge_load=YES mxge_ethp_z8e_load=YES mxge_eth_z8e_load=YES mxge_rss_ethp_z8e_load=YES mxge_rss_eth_z8e_load=YES I blindly added these w/o thinking what they do. Should I simply only load the first line? - aurf On Aug 16, 2013, at 8:18 AM, aurfalien wrote: Hi, I've been suspecting my NIC is not up to par and notice this in the logs every few minutes; Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: slice 0 struck? ring state: Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: tx.req=1914503981 tx.done=1914503810, tx.queue_active=0 Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: tx.activate=0 tx.deactivate=0 Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: pkt_done=1824019832 fw=1824019931 Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: Watchdog reset! Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: NIC did not reboot, not resetting Could tis be effecting throughput? My card is a Myri-10G-PCIE-8A I did install the Myrinet dev tools for FreeBSD and ran myri_info which yields; pci-dev at 05:00.0 vendor:product(rev)=14c1:0008(00) behind bridge root-port: 00:03.0 8086:3c08 (x8.1/x16.3) Myri-10G-PCIE-8A -- Link x8 EEPROM String-spec: MAC=00:60:dd:45:73:23 SN=413665 PWR=100 PC=10G-PCIE-8A-R PN=09-03852 XFI=AEL1010 TAG=ze_tools-1_4_45 EEPROM MCP, PRESENT, length = 103384, crc=0x119daf46 ETHZ::1.4.45 2009/08/22 18:57:06 self extracting firmware Bundle: exec_len=72144, PCI-ROM-len = 31232 Running MCP: ETH ::1.4.55 -P- 2012/04/21 01:48:34 myri10ge firmware Any insights are appreciated. - aurf Did the ole RTFM and re programmed the firmware, all good now. - aurf ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Laptop Fn key causes X (Gnome 2) to sleep immediately
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:07:25 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: What keyboard / laptop has the key code '150' map to 'go to sleep' ? My Sun Type 7 USB keyboard has the Copy key at code 150... :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
pkg install on freshly installed 9.1 doesn't find any packages
I installed 9.1 from iso image. Then 'pkg' command brought pkg-1.0.11 package. Now commands like 'pkg install gnome2' always say: pkg: Package 'gnome2' was not found in the repositories. Am I missing something? This is vanilla 9.1 from DVD image. Nothing else. Yuri ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: pkg install on freshly installed 9.1 doesn't find any packages
On 17/08/2013 05:41, Yuri wrote:
I installed 9.1 from iso image.
Then 'pkg' command brought pkg-1.0.11 package.
Now commands like 'pkg install gnome2' always say:
pkg: Package 'gnome2' was not found in the repositories.
Am I missing something? This is vanilla 9.1 from DVD image. Nothing else.
You have an old version of pkg there, and it looks like the pkg.conf
that came with that version doesn't point at a repository with any
useful contents.
Try:
pkg upgrade
which /should/ get you pkg-1.1.4_1
Then check ${LOCALBASE}/etc/pkg.conf and make sure packagesite is set to:
http://pkg.freebsd.org/${ABI}/latest
or there are some other publicly availble repos: Exonetric has one, as
does PC-BSD.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey
JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
