[videoblogging] Re: vlogweek '07 update
First off, I'm really excited about this years VBW. As I've mentioned countless times before, I started vlogging the week after vloggingweek 2006. As far as the theme goes, I personally will be doing the 7 vids in 7 days. I think that in itself will be challenge enough. With that said, might I suggest a theme along the lines of education and promotion of vlogging; SHOW TELL. Show how vlogging has changed for you or changed you. Tell others how easy it is or direct them to freevlog.org or your favorite teaching site. Show them snippits from other peoples vlogs. Spread the word, spread the love. I think there are a few of us, me included, that could do a better job of promoting our community, our vlogging community. The graphics look great for videobloggingweek2007, but whoever created them, could we get the same graphics, but in video size? 320x240 (or whatever) ;). I can resize, but too much gets cropped. Woot! One week away. Mike http://vlog.mikemoon.net --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think Josh means we've agreed on the tag, not the technoratti tag. Many others will be tracking videoblogging week too. :) The proper tag should be videobloggingweek2007 just as it was videobloggingweek2006 the year before, and videobloggingweek2005 the year before that. As for theme's I do like the seven deadly sins for seven (deadly) days of videoblogging, but I also hope some people can come up with some more creative ideas. If I were to suggest a rally cry it would be God save the mainstream! as in mainstream media. A parody of god save the queen the most famous punk rock song ever. I hope this page helps. I've started adding links to past videoblogging week resources so you can look back at bast themes. There were some good blogs in 2005 and 2006 covering the blow by blow thanks to Steve G and others. http://videobloggingweek.pbwiki.com/ Password is videobloggingweek2007. Please help edit. -Mike mefeedia.com mmeiser.com/blog On 3/24/07, Devlon Duthie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did I miss the discussion on depending on technorati this year for tracking our tags? -Devlon Josh Leo wrote: Ok folks, we are one week away from Videobloggingweek2007 I usually don't do themes for videoblogging week, but i know it helps other people so lets knock out some ideas for themes adn then pick them. So far all I have seriously heard was the 7 deadly sins we have agreed on the technorati tag, now we need to nail out some other details. so what do we want videoblogging week to look like this year? Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [videoblogging] Re: BikiniZero.com Tech News Bikini-Driven!
I'm takin' the power (and the money) back: http://fauxpress.blogspot.com/2007/03/tee-o-day.html Jan On 3/24/07, Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, I did my bit: http://www.beginningwithi.com/tech/barcamproma.html On 23 Mar 2007 18:09:51 -0700, Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That what I'm talking about! Fairness! Balance. Like I said, I'm willing to negotiate. The beefcake in question don't have to be 100% skivvy free. 93.5% is good enough to start the conversation rolling. Thank you for seeing the humor and potential large and lucrative market opportunity of women folk who might not be into Pr0n but who would appreciate the aesthetics of a well developed yet intellectually sensual man who is properly exposed doing anything nice and slow. Or at least can stay up on the down stroke. To each his/her own. Peace and laughter, Gena --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, filmanimationweb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Gena I wanted to re-dress your statements to make sure I understand the bared meaning of your suggestiveness: I take it under my belt that you would support the erection, by me, of a site to do with somewhat nude - or, who are we kidding, quite nudaceous - beefcakes, delivering their daily events in the form of of a beefcakey, newsy-type tech showing? If that's the case, I wanted to satisfy you, that we are indeed working ourselves up to such a fever; when bikinizero opens up into having better legs under itself, we most definitely have the plan to emit forth another show, called 'BeefcakeNews.com'; Our huge handling of the bikini news must of course come first, as we are men and must follow our prime instinctuals, and by that I mean doing women first in bikinis, and after that we of course can fit in a man to deliver. Just messing with you :) We do in fact have plans to do a show called Beefcake news; we need a few months of getting BikiniZero established and solid, and then we can do one for the ladies! Thanks for your comments, you are funny enough to be a BZ writer! --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, Gena compumavengal@ wrote: Hey Jan, I don't want men in a bikini. I want the men folk naked! And when they have to demo a product I want men to wiggle in front of the camera just like the women folk seem to do. I don't object to the show. They certainly put a lot of time and effort into it. I just want parity. I want a dude with the muscally muscles to talk to me about the advantages of high speed SD cards. I want discussions about hard drives to go in a whole new direction. Oh, if he's got some meat on his thighs that's alright with me. And if he is a bear or bare with the hair I don't care. Fair is fair. When they make a point there should be a point that is visible to all. Now I am willing to be flexible. If they can find the right skimmy skimp for the guys to wear that would be acceptable. Stay away from plaid tho. It don't do it for me. I'd actually have to concentrate on what he was talking about. So if the folks at BikiniZero can see a way to be more gender inclusive, I will certainly do my part to spread the word. Gena http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com http://pcclibtech.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, Jan McLaughlin jannie.jan@ wrote: Don't f'in' get me started. Aw crap. Here it comes... The lesson: women must take better / more directed advantage of silly men. They are totally at our mercy. What is it we women really want? Why don't more women create these shows and make $ off 'em? I know there's a reason. Can it be a good reason? Jan On 3/23/07, Adam Quirk, Wreck Salvage quirk@ wrote: Thank you Taylor. On 3/23/07, filmanimationweb 24pfilms@ wrote: Hey Adam, I wanted to say we (BikiniZero) really like your show, great writing...wanted to bid on your first run of ads, but I needed to feed the crew ;) I think Drew won? Taylor Moore www.bikinizero.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, Adam Quirk, Wreck Salvage quirk@ wrote: I would subscribe if there was more penetration. On 3/22/07, filmanimationweb 24pfilms@ wrote: Hi Gang, Just wanted to post the link to our first episode of our weekly tech show. We also have a contest for the best tech story of the month, so enter to win a video ipod.. In addition to flash and QT we are using a cool full screen, high quality video
[videoblogging] Re: vlogweek '07 update
As a follow-up, I've added 320x240 versions off Josh's VBW logo on the Wiki. Also a smaller 200x one. I'll go now... I feel a vlog about to exit one of my oraphis. Mike --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Moon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The graphics look great for videobloggingweek2007, but whoever created them, could we get the same graphics, but in video size? 320x240 (or whatever) ;). I can resize, but too much gets cropped. Woot! One week away. Mike http://vlog.mikemoon.net --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Meiser groups-yahoo-com@ wrote: http://videobloggingweek.pbwiki.com/ Password is videobloggingweek2007. Please help edit.
[videoblogging] Re: Local TV Covers my Vlog
I think I got some traffic out of it but it's hard to track because they didn't actually link back to my vlog. Which was an oversight on the part of the web management people according to the reporter who did the piece--and they still haven't fixed it yet. It would have been nice to see it linked when the story was actually posted--especially since the anchor said on air that it would be linked after the story ran... morons. Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com www.billstreeter.net --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wow, just wow. First, Congrats again bill! I wonder if you'll get more local viewers out of it? Second... flash... not windows media player, not real player... I can actually play it in my browser. Wow, we've come a long way in the last two years. Now all they need is some sharing features like source and a downloadable mp4 in their RSS feed so I can revlog it. Third... wow again... it's actually not BAD... in fact I don't want to go crazy but it's maybe even a good representation of vlogging. BTW, what was with the washed out colors... that was just weird... it's like the hole thing was digitized by putting a camera on the TV screen. The macintosh video was completely white. :) Finally, that hillary clinton video... I still haven't seen it... but what's funny is that WASN'T just some vlogger... it was created and then leaked by a PR guy at a major political PR firm that does work for Obama among others. It's a complete misrepresentation of vlogging, but I just think it's funny. Mainstream media goes out to report on vlogging and ends up reporting on their own echo chamber. Are we even here? -Mike mmeiser.com/blog mefeedia.com On 3/24/07, Richard (Show) Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bill, This is really a nice news piece. Congratulations, and good luck with your bungalow ... Richard On 23 Mar 2007 05:02:47 -0700, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Our local Fox afiliate did a story about my vlog and vlogging in general last night. It's online now you can see it here: http://tinyurl.com/yvwjhw Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com www.billstreeter.net -- Richard http://richardhhall.org Shows http://richardshow.org http://inspiredhealing.tv [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [videoblogging] Re: vlogweek '07 update
I put some files up - - video - interview with McDonalds pianist / composer Andrew Shapiro - Adam Quirk plays journalist - ECU's of fruit being cut up - audio interview with Andrew Shapiro - some of Andrew's music I've a place for this interview to play that will get some eyes. C'mon - come play 'Production Company' with people you respect. Better than chess. Jan P.S. I stole the VBW logo from Verdi I think :) On 3/25/07, Mike Moon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As a follow-up, I've added 320x240 versions off Josh's VBW logo on the Wiki. Also a smaller 200x one. I'll go now... I feel a vlog about to exit one of my oraphis. Mike --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Moon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The graphics look great for videobloggingweek2007, but whoever created them, could we get the same graphics, but in video size? 320x240 (or whatever) ;). I can resize, but too much gets cropped. Woot! One week away. Mike http://vlog.mikemoon.net --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Meiser groups-yahoo-com@ wrote: http://videobloggingweek.pbwiki.com/ Password is videobloggingweek2007. Please help edit. Yahoo! Groups Links -- The Faux Press - better than real http://fauxpress.blogspot.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: Local TV Covers my Vlog
I sent a comment to the Fox site asking for the link to the vlogger in the story or to post the link with the story. :) Now they did ask for my 5 digit zipcode... and well, I only know one... 90210. :) Mike http://vlog.mikemoon.net --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think I got some traffic out of it but it's hard to track because they didn't actually link back to my vlog. Which was an oversight on the part of the web management people according to the reporter who did the piece--and they still haven't fixed it yet. It would have been nice to see it linked when the story was actually posted--especially since the anchor said on air that it would be linked after the story ran... morons. Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com www.billstreeter.net --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, groups-yahoo-com@ wrote: Wow, just wow. First, Congrats again bill! I wonder if you'll get more local viewers out of it? Second... flash... not windows media player, not real player... I can actually play it in my browser. Wow, we've come a long way in the last two years. Now all they need is some sharing features like source and a downloadable mp4 in their RSS feed so I can revlog it. Third... wow again... it's actually not BAD... in fact I don't want to go crazy but it's maybe even a good representation of vlogging. BTW, what was with the washed out colors... that was just weird... it's like the hole thing was digitized by putting a camera on the TV screen. The macintosh video was completely white. :) Finally, that hillary clinton video... I still haven't seen it... but what's funny is that WASN'T just some vlogger... it was created and then leaked by a PR guy at a major political PR firm that does work for Obama among others. It's a complete misrepresentation of vlogging, but I just think it's funny. Mainstream media goes out to report on vlogging and ends up reporting on their own echo chamber. Are we even here? -Mike mmeiser.com/blog mefeedia.com On 3/24/07, Richard (Show) Hall richard@ wrote: Bill, This is really a nice news piece. Congratulations, and good luck with your bungalow ... Richard On 23 Mar 2007 05:02:47 -0700, Bill Streeter bill@ wrote: Our local Fox afiliate did a story about my vlog and vlogging in general last night. It's online now you can see it here: http://tinyurl.com/yvwjhw Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com www.billstreeter.net -- Richard http://richardhhall.org Shows http://richardshow.org http://inspiredhealing.tv [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links
[videoblogging] Re: BikiniZero.com Tech News Bikini-Driven!
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jan McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't f'in' get me started. Aw crap. Here it comes... The lesson: women must take better / more directed advantage of silly men. They are totally at our mercy. What is it we women really want? Why don't more women create these shows and make $ off 'em? I know there's a reason. Can it be a good reason? Jan I hadn't given any thought to the statistics behind whether it's men or women that exploit the advantage over silly men of sex sells, but I'd have to guess that you're right and that there aren't enough women behind the camera as it were in these situations. Women are being 'used' to drive interest in shows or websites, but other than being hired as on-air talent, they're probably not too involved in the process. I wonder how tough it would be for a group of women to get together and create a production company or whatever to 'exploit' their own (meaning women in general, not THE women of the production company. :D) aesthetic advantages. A possible reason why not is that ambitious women wouldn't be inclined to 'stoop so low' to add to the stereotype of utilizing sex or sexuality to make a profit. Who knows? Interesting question. :D -- Bill C. http://TheLab.ReelSolid.TV
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Let's Help The Others, As We Used To, To Vlog
i think the elitist label is bullshit. i think this list is great people are welcome to rant and rave and get to the nitty gritty of online video hell meiser and watkins post novels every day... and it's insane how much people help each other tirelessly on this list to figure out tech stuff. i've been on other lists of videomakers and people aren't nearly as helpful as on this list. usually the answers/attitudes are just google it or go find it on a message board so i'd like to sing the praises of this group. after visiting the cold harsh lists of other video groups i gladly return to the videoblogging list for a passionate rant and friendly fisticuffs daily. (ok it's more than that) as for helping people watkins are you holding any events? are you getting people to videoblog? i think the list you stated is a good example of what people in this community are capable and willing to create and i think that's pretty fucking amazing. and if you don't think that's enough it's up to you (and anyone really) to do something about it. i love the videoblogging list no matter how crazy it can get. -ryanne On 24 Mar 2007 16:55:12 -0700, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cheers, although I dont actually think that stuff was a problem or really a reflection of any problems the group may have. I spend so much time here stating my opinions, that I cant really complain if anybody else ever states an opinion about me. I think its quite normal that people would maybe treat my opinions on vlogging differently if I actually vlogged a lot and they could 'see me' more. If I had ever had a sucessful web business then my opinions on other businesses might be taken differently by some, etc etc. And I can see why it might seem weird to spend so much time on a blogging group and reading and whining my opinions, when Im not blogging, vlogging or doing a business or even having all that much time to watch video. Anyways, I have been someone who moaned here and there about elitism or some other aspects of this group, but Ive also been fairly negative about possible alternatives. For me the group is healthy if opinions are diverse, so I wouldnt mind a few elitist comments here and there as it would reflect the fact there must be someone somewher who holds such views. Just so long as the whole group doesnt suffer from such things. Same with clique stuff, I think there may have been some tendencies towards this but it was never the whole group, it was clumps of people or even just one person using wording that might have sounded elitist, and maybe was or wasnt, it never usually got explored in depth, possibly because the label 'elitist' sounds negative so not many people think they are guilty of that. Some of the things that might put newcomers off this group are accidental or systemic, or chance. For example there are still threads people post that never get responded to. If its someone like me posting then it doesnt really matter because I post a lot, but a lurker or newbie who posts and is then largely or completely unresponded to, may suffer more as a consquence. Generally this isnt a huge problem and someoneusually steps up to the plate, or if there is silence then it may be for a good reason, or there is jsut too much email, but thats the sort of thing I think could be improved on by improving systems rather than it being a case of the wrong people being here. So I wouldnt suggest stating another group unless it had some things at its core that would make it pretty fundamentally different to this group. I dont know quite what this means in practice, but for example if the conversations were mostly video then it would feel different. I mean I wouldnt know if its possible to make the group either more or less like it was in the past. Time has moved on, various people have various reasons for not posting much to this group, their own personal vlog voyage may have moved on. Also not everyone is as willing to endlessly repeat themselves as I am, so once they've said everything they could think to say here, and the honeymoon burst of initial energy has worn off, things change. Also I suspect that over time various events, arguments, watershed moments in this group, make some people wary of bringing up certain subjects. The virtual presence of certain strong characters or opinions can leave its mark. Over the years of being online, Ive occasionally got paranoid in various communities (usually forums) ive been in, that my words may be doing more harm than good, which leads to me shutting up for months to see if its a better place without me. And over the years in this group I have sometimes questioned m worth which usually elicits enough replies to make me stick around, but then I feel guilty about email traffic being generated arounf the topic of me, when I dont really think theres anything very interesting to talk about me, which is one of the many reasons
Re: [videoblogging] vlogweek '07 update
I'd love to see more people get behind and support mefeedia. But this community doesnt work that way (not even the active 8%). And nor should they nec be groupies to a broad interpretation of Net Video Culture. It's not easy sustaining a community of people solely on the premise of technology adoption. Still, mefeedia will be involved with vbw07 in some way or another... Lists, Guides, tags Remind me, does mefeedia track tags from blog posts or do you have to tag stuff locally on mefeedia site? Sull On 3/24/07, Devlon Duthie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did I miss the discussion on depending on technorati this year for tracking our tags? -Devlon Josh Leo wrote: Ok folks, we are one week away from Videobloggingweek2007 I usually don't do themes for videoblogging week, but i know it helps other people so lets knock out some ideas for themes adn then pick them. So far all I have seriously heard was the 7 deadly sins we have agreed on the technorati tag, now we need to nail out some other details. so what do we want videoblogging week to look like this year? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] blogger atom.xml issues?
yeah it should only have about 25 posts in it. that's how much it spits out at a time. not sure what other feeds do. but i know the blogger atom feed i throw in feedburner kicks out at max 25. i'll check a wordpress feed http://sustainableroute.com/?feed=rss2 this RSS feed from wordpress only shows 10! so i think your atom blogger feed is doing pretty well. -ryanne On 23 Mar 2007 11:22:18 -0700, Sanford Dickert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Question for you blogger users: are any of you having problems with the feed from blogger/blogspot? As in, the atom.xml feed - I can only see 25 posts, does anyone else see this happening to yourself? I have been in touch with some of the lead engineers at google - but they suggest that atom.xml only supports a limited feed (these guys are not with blogger)... Thanks for your help. Sanford -- Pixelodeon-June 9th 10th American Film Institute (AFI) LA, CA From the Computer Screen to the Big Screen http://pixelodeonfest.com/ -- Author of Secrets of Videoblogging http://tinyurl.com/me4vs Me http://RyanEdit.com, http://RyanIsHungry.com Educate http://FreeVlog.org, http://Node101.org Community Capitalism http://HaveMoneyWillVlog.com iChat/AIM VideoRodeo [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Let's Help The Others, As We Used To, To Vlog
snap! no... werd. , TrueThat!. yeeaw. elitism is a self-induced illusionary defense mechanism. this group... it is what it is (whatever that means since its shifts throughout the year.) i'm glad its here. but i long for something more intimate. i recently tried something. so far its failing as expected. but one night i just tossed up a new group and called it ambiguously... ForThoseOfUs http://forthoseof.us. wtf is it? not sure. likely nothing at all. sull On 25 Mar 2007 09:50:04 -0700, ryanne hodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i think the elitist label is bullshit. i think this list is great people are welcome to rant and rave and get to the nitty gritty of online video hell meiser and watkins post novels every day... and it's insane how much people help each other tirelessly on this list to figure out tech stuff. i've been on other lists of videomakers and people aren't nearly as helpful as on this list. usually the answers/attitudes are just google it or go find it on a message board so i'd like to sing the praises of this group. after visiting the cold harsh lists of other video groups i gladly return to the videoblogging list for a passionate rant and friendly fisticuffs daily. (ok it's more than that) as for helping people watkins are you holding any events? are you getting people to videoblog? i think the list you stated is a good example of what people in this community are capable and willing to create and i think that's pretty fucking amazing. and if you don't think that's enough it's up to you (and anyone really) to do something about it. i love the videoblogging list no matter how crazy it can get. -ryanne On 24 Mar 2007 16:55:12 -0700, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]steve%40dvmachine.com wrote: Cheers, although I dont actually think that stuff was a problem or really a reflection of any problems the group may have. I spend so much time here stating my opinions, that I cant really complain if anybody else ever states an opinion about me. I think its quite normal that people would maybe treat my opinions on vlogging differently if I actually vlogged a lot and they could 'see me' more. If I had ever had a sucessful web business then my opinions on other businesses might be taken differently by some, etc etc. And I can see why it might seem weird to spend so much time on a blogging group and reading and whining my opinions, when Im not blogging, vlogging or doing a business or even having all that much time to watch video. Anyways, I have been someone who moaned here and there about elitism or some other aspects of this group, but Ive also been fairly negative about possible alternatives. For me the group is healthy if opinions are diverse, so I wouldnt mind a few elitist comments here and there as it would reflect the fact there must be someone somewher who holds such views. Just so long as the whole group doesnt suffer from such things. Same with clique stuff, I think there may have been some tendencies towards this but it was never the whole group, it was clumps of people or even just one person using wording that might have sounded elitist, and maybe was or wasnt, it never usually got explored in depth, possibly because the label 'elitist' sounds negative so not many people think they are guilty of that. Some of the things that might put newcomers off this group are accidental or systemic, or chance. For example there are still threads people post that never get responded to. If its someone like me posting then it doesnt really matter because I post a lot, but a lurker or newbie who posts and is then largely or completely unresponded to, may suffer more as a consquence. Generally this isnt a huge problem and someoneusually steps up to the plate, or if there is silence then it may be for a good reason, or there is jsut too much email, but thats the sort of thing I think could be improved on by improving systems rather than it being a case of the wrong people being here. So I wouldnt suggest stating another group unless it had some things at its core that would make it pretty fundamentally different to this group. I dont know quite what this means in practice, but for example if the conversations were mostly video then it would feel different. I mean I wouldnt know if its possible to make the group either more or less like it was in the past. Time has moved on, various people have various reasons for not posting much to this group, their own personal vlog voyage may have moved on. Also not everyone is as willing to endlessly repeat themselves as I am, so once they've said everything they could think to say here, and the honeymoon burst of initial energy has worn off, things change. Also I suspect that over time various events, arguments, watershed moments in this group, make some people wary of bringing up certain subjects. The
[videoblogging] My videoblogging roots and today's NYTimes article
Today, I'm unsure how to react to this news -- having your person, property and rights violated is an unsettling experience. Would definitely like to hear your thoughts on this as I'm processing the information. On Friday morning, I was informed by a NYTimes reporter that recent documents uncovered just how far the NYPD went to suppress Free Speech -- mine and others -- at the Republican Convention in 2004. Here's what the NYTimes reported in the Sunday edition: City Police Spied Broadly Before G.O.P. Convention http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/25/nyregion/25infiltrate.html?ex=1332561600en=3af0cd0ac568e430ei=5124partner=permalinkexprod=permalink Bikes Against Bush http://www.bikesagainstbush.com was my graduate thesis project, a combination of mechanical engineering, WiFi, interactive mobile messaging, and videoblogging. It was featured in Popular Science magazine for the engineering design of the bicycle that printed chalk text messages sent through SMS and from my website onto streets and sidewalks in NYC. Apparently, the NYPD considered this project to be a threat and was determined to shut it down. They had a copy of the Popular Science article in a file along with 4 pages of notes as to why my project was a threat. This led to my bizarre arrest, which happened on national television while I was being interviewed by Ron Reagan on MSNBC's Hardball. I was arrested with no crime being committed. Just simply plucked from the street, jailed for 24 hours, and my computer, cell phone and bicycle confiscated and held for over a year (the bicycle was never returned). The fake charges against me were dropped 6 months later. The NYTimes article confirms what I had long suspected -- that the NYPD was unlawfully conducting surveillance of artists, activists, and others seeking to exercise free speech at the RNC convention in 2004. Here are the videos: The Bike Project http://www.bikesagainstbush.com/blog/iloveny.mov The Arrest -- Street Footage http://www.bikesagainstbush.com/blog/bikesarrest.mov MSNBC Interview http://www.bikesagainstbush.com/blog/msnbc_8-29-2004_med1.mov BikesAgainstBush was important because it was one of the earliest demonstrations of the power of the blogosphere to distribute video -- the raw street-footage of the arrest circulated around the blogosphere and was viewed by millions of people both before and after the edited version aired on MSNBC's Hardball. Immediately after this project, I began working on software to distribute video via RSS. I met Jay Dedman around this time in NYC, and we began working together. This became ANT (ANT's Not Television) and later FireAnt http://FireAnt.tv. I wanted to share my thoughts here, in the videoblogging community, as I'm reflecting today on the state of media, how far we've come and the work that remains... Best, Josh
Re: [videoblogging] vlogweek '07 update
I know. The theme should be Organized Chaos. Isn't that what has happened in this space? On 3/24/07, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok folks, we are one week away from Videobloggingweek2007 I usually don't do themes for videoblogging week, but i know it helps other people so lets knock out some ideas for themes adn then pick them. So far all I have seriously heard was the 7 deadly sins we have agreed on the technorati tag, now we need to nail out some other details. so what do we want videoblogging week to look like this year? -- Josh Leo www.JoshLeo.com www.WanderingWestMichigan.com www.SlowLorisMedia.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] vlogweek '07 update
Hey sull, That wasn't my point, and (that time) I wasn't even touting Mefeedia. I just remember all the fuss last year when technorati wasn't keeping up with the tags...and that I missed the discussion, was curious to hear what wonderous things had been discussed. Since we figured there might be a lapse in tag tracking this year, we have spent a bit of effort to see if we can keep up with Videobloggingweekand some of that effort has been in rounding out the tags that we parse from the rss post. So, the short answer, is we track tags as they come in from the posts and also you can tag clips at Mefeedia. ...and you don't have to enlighten me on how this community works sull, I know all too well :) Thanks, Devlon sull wrote: I'd love to see more people get behind and support mefeedia. But this community doesnt work that way (not even the active 8%). And nor should they nec be groupies to a broad interpretation of Net Video Culture. It's not easy sustaining a community of people solely on the premise of technology adoption. Still, mefeedia will be involved with vbw07 in some way or another... Lists, Guides, tags Remind me, does mefeedia track tags from blog posts or do you have to tag stuff locally on mefeedia site? Sull On 3/24/07, Devlon Duthie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did I miss the discussion on depending on technorati this year for tracking our tags? -Devlon Josh Leo wrote: Ok folks, we are one week away from Videobloggingweek2007 I usually don't do themes for videoblogging week, but i know it helps other people so lets knock out some ideas for themes adn then pick them. So far all I have seriously heard was the 7 deadly sins we have agreed on the technorati tag, now we need to nail out some other details. so what do we want videoblogging week to look like this year? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [videoblogging] vlogweek '07 update
Let's use all the tagging services (Blip, Mefeedia, Delicious, Technorati) and see which keeps track best. Take half a dozen vloggers who post every day of VBW and first thing 4/8 run 'em through the test mill with screenshots of the results Mefeedia's gonna have to do something outstanding to have me drag them back into my burgeoning workflow. It kinda lost me when the formatting from Blogger -- Mefeedia stopped translating well. I couldn't bear to look at the destruction the cross-post wrought. Do Mefeedia and Technorati read / recognize Blip's tags? Jan On 3/25/07, Devlon Duthie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey sull, That wasn't my point, and (that time) I wasn't even touting Mefeedia. I just remember all the fuss last year when technorati wasn't keeping up with the tags...and that I missed the discussion, was curious to hear what wonderous things had been discussed. Since we figured there might be a lapse in tag tracking this year, we have spent a bit of effort to see if we can keep up with Videobloggingweekand some of that effort has been in rounding out the tags that we parse from the rss post. So, the short answer, is we track tags as they come in from the posts and also you can tag clips at Mefeedia. ...and you don't have to enlighten me on how this community works sull, I know all too well :) Thanks, Devlon sull wrote: I'd love to see more people get behind and support mefeedia. But this community doesnt work that way (not even the active 8%). And nor should they nec be groupies to a broad interpretation of Net Video Culture. It's not easy sustaining a community of people solely on the premise of technology adoption. Still, mefeedia will be involved with vbw07 in some way or another... Lists, Guides, tags Remind me, does mefeedia track tags from blog posts or do you have to tag stuff locally on mefeedia site? Sull On 3/24/07, Devlon Duthie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did I miss the discussion on depending on technorati this year for tracking our tags? -Devlon Josh Leo wrote: Ok folks, we are one week away from Videobloggingweek2007 I usually don't do themes for videoblogging week, but i know it helps other people so lets knock out some ideas for themes adn then pick them. So far all I have seriously heard was the 7 deadly sins we have agreed on the technorati tag, now we need to nail out some other details. so what do we want videoblogging week to look like this year? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links -- The Faux Press - better than real http://fauxpress.blogspot.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] vlogweek '07 update
Thanks Jan, that's a better way of what I was trying to say. Use all the main tagging services you can handle, not just one. I think we've fixed up the blogger-mf formatting, please let me/us know if you see something that looks goofy. The new changes related to tagging involve parsing the description, content and content:encoded of the rss item/post for rel=tag (this should be in everyone's workflow imho) as well as adding keywords from media:keywords, media:category and itunes:keywords. I was pretty surprised how many people don't tag their clips. (...sorry sull, it's a very bad, bad morning...mea culpa?) -- Devlon Jan McLaughlin wrote: Let's use all the tagging services (Blip, Mefeedia, Delicious, Technorati) and see which keeps track best. Take half a dozen vloggers who post every day of VBW and first thing 4/8 run 'em through the test mill with screenshots of the results Mefeedia's gonna have to do something outstanding to have me drag them back into my burgeoning workflow. It kinda lost me when the formatting from Blogger -- Mefeedia stopped translating well. I couldn't bear to look at the destruction the cross-post wrought. Do Mefeedia and Technorati read / recognize Blip's tags? Jan On 3/25/07, Devlon Duthie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey sull, That wasn't my point, and (that time) I wasn't even touting Mefeedia. I just remember all the fuss last year when technorati wasn't keeping up with the tags...and that I missed the discussion, was curious to hear what wonderous things had been discussed. Since we figured there might be a lapse in tag tracking this year, we have spent a bit of effort to see if we can keep up with Videobloggingweekand some of that effort has been in rounding out the tags that we parse from the rss post. So, the short answer, is we track tags as they come in from the posts and also you can tag clips at Mefeedia. ...and you don't have to enlighten me on how this community works sull, I know all too well :) Thanks, Devlon sull wrote: I'd love to see more people get behind and support mefeedia. But this community doesnt work that way (not even the active 8%). And nor should they nec be groupies to a broad interpretation of Net Video Culture. It's not easy sustaining a community of people solely on the premise of technology adoption. Still, mefeedia will be involved with vbw07 in some way or another... Lists, Guides, tags Remind me, does mefeedia track tags from blog posts or do you have to tag stuff locally on mefeedia site? Sull On 3/24/07, Devlon Duthie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did I miss the discussion on depending on technorati this year for tracking our tags? -Devlon Josh Leo wrote: Ok folks, we are one week away from Videobloggingweek2007 I usually don't do themes for videoblogging week, but i know it helps other people so lets knock out some ideas for themes adn then pick them. So far all I have seriously heard was the 7 deadly sins we have agreed on the technorati tag, now we need to nail out some other details. so what do we want videoblogging week to look like this year? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [videoblogging] My videoblogging roots and today's NYTimes article
Josh - I am going to make time to review your links, and wanted to post a quick acknowledgement of your brilliant project and thank you for sharing your story with the group. There are so many elements in here to think about. Rox On 25 Mar 2007 10:06:10 -0700, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Today, I'm unsure how to react to this news -- having your person, property and rights violated is an unsettling experience. Would definitely like to hear your thoughts on this as I'm processing the information. On Friday morning, I was informed by a NYTimes reporter that recent documents uncovered just how far the NYPD went to suppress Free Speech -- mine and others -- at the Republican Convention in 2004. Here's what the NYTimes reported in the Sunday edition: City Police Spied Broadly Before G.O.P. Convention http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/25/nyregion/25infiltrate.html?ex=1332561600en=3af0cd0ac568e430ei=5124partner=permalinkexprod=permalink Bikes Against Bush http://www.bikesagainstbush.com was my graduate thesis project, a combination of mechanical engineering, WiFi, interactive mobile messaging, and videoblogging. It was featured in Popular Science magazine for the engineering design of the bicycle that printed chalk text messages sent through SMS and from my website onto streets and sidewalks in NYC. Apparently, the NYPD considered this project to be a threat and was determined to shut it down. They had a copy of the Popular Science article in a file along with 4 pages of notes as to why my project was a threat. This led to my bizarre arrest, which happened on national television while I was being interviewed by Ron Reagan on MSNBC's Hardball. I was arrested with no crime being committed. Just simply plucked from the street, jailed for 24 hours, and my computer, cell phone and bicycle confiscated and held for over a year (the bicycle was never returned). The fake charges against me were dropped 6 months later. The NYTimes article confirms what I had long suspected -- that the NYPD was unlawfully conducting surveillance of artists, activists, and others seeking to exercise free speech at the RNC convention in 2004. Here are the videos: The Bike Project http://www.bikesagainstbush.com/blog/iloveny.mov The Arrest -- Street Footage http://www.bikesagainstbush.com/blog/bikesarrest.mov MSNBC Interview http://www.bikesagainstbush.com/blog/msnbc_8-29-2004_med1.mov BikesAgainstBush was important because it was one of the earliest demonstrations of the power of the blogosphere to distribute video -- the raw street-footage of the arrest circulated around the blogosphere and was viewed by millions of people both before and after the edited version aired on MSNBC's Hardball. Immediately after this project, I began working on software to distribute video via RSS. I met Jay Dedman around this time in NYC, and we began working together. This became ANT (ANT's Not Television) and later FireAnt http://FireAnt.tv. I wanted to share my thoughts here, in the videoblogging community, as I'm reflecting today on the state of media, how far we've come and the work that remains... Best, Josh -- Roxanne Darling o ke kai means of the sea in hawaiian 808-384-5554 http://www.beachwalks.tv http://www.barefeetshop.com http://www.barefeetstudios.com http://www.inthetransition.com
[videoblogging] Intro: The Gameshelf
Hi folks, I just discovered this group by way of the most excellent blip.tv, where I just relocated my own show, The Gameshelf. I don't really consider it a vlog as it's not very bloggy in style or presentation, and more like a traditional half-hour TV show. In fact, it's produced as a community access TV show where I live in Somerville, Massachusetts (just north of Boston), but I consider it more of a video podcast than a literal television program. Its blip page: http://thegameshelf.blip.tv The show features my friends and me examining obscure games of all sorts, including board, parlor, and digital games. I've produced five episodes so far, all of which you can see on blip. The first four were largely produced at the end of 2005, but I published the most recent (and certainly the best) one just a few weeks ago, and I consider it the start of our second season. I hope to make a couple more before summer. I also want to concentrate more on both promoting the show and becoming more active in the online video-production community. So, hi! I'd love to hear comments and criticism about my work. -- Jason McIntosh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM:zendonut Cell: 617-792-3829 President and Founder Volity Games http://volity.net
[videoblogging] Re: My videoblogging roots and today's NYTimes article
Joshua, I woke up this morning and heard a brief story on NPR about this. I said to myself, I'm probably in some dang database. I heard something about an RNC/NYPD work task force. For those outside the U.S. http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/03/25/news/protest.php This is a direct result of an imperial presidency and the PATRIOT Act. And yeah, I've suspected that we had/have increase scrutiny from certain governmental agencies in this list as well. I could say that it is a perverse badge of honor. But that may be a little too optimistic spin on this. I could bring up ancient anger and say that this is what we get when Americans collectively chose not to participate in the process of elections. That this is what we get when in fear mode we permit all kinds of abuses in the name of safety. My country tis of thee? Sometimes yes, lately ??? This is one instance where being African-American helps me to cope with this kind of thing. It happens. You were not a person. You were an objective. A Not Like Us person. The Other. It will continue to happen until attention is focused on this event. NYPD has to be made to feel so uncomfortable that it will promises heaven and earth not to do it again. Unlikely but possible. Be angry. Be aggressive in finding out the complete truth and be strong in your conviction that you were exercising your rights as a citizen. After you do all of that. Acceptance. The acceptance part is that you and your rights were violated. As you think about it more it is gonna eat at you. You will need to find a healthy way to discharge that energy. It will take some time. Because you are going to realize just how deep this cuts and the number of layers this is going to penetrate your being. The best metaphor I can give you is in the winter when the wind blows. You are standing there. The wind blows. Because of the wind chill factor it feel much colder than what it is in reality. You have two choices: One is to clench up and take it full blast - this will ensure the shivers. Discomfort. A loss of personal power. Until it stops. Two is to accept the wind and allow it to pass through you. You are still cold but you decide what you will and will not latch on to as you deal with this situation. I wish I had better words for you. I know what I'm trying to say but it isn't coming out right. So I'll stop with do the best you can. ...peace, be still Gena --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Today, I'm unsure how to react to this news -- having your person, property and rights violated is an unsettling experience. Would definitely like to hear your thoughts on this as I'm processing the information. On Friday morning, I was informed by a NYTimes reporter that recent documents uncovered just how far the NYPD went to suppress Free Speech -- mine and others -- at the Republican Convention in 2004. Here's what the NYTimes reported in the Sunday edition: City Police Spied Broadly Before G.O.P. Convention http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/25/nyregion/25infiltrate.html?ex=1332561600en=3af0cd0ac568e430ei=5124partner=permalinkexprod=permalink Bikes Against Bush http://www.bikesagainstbush.com was my graduate thesis project, a combination of mechanical engineering, WiFi, interactive mobile messaging, and videoblogging. It was featured in Popular Science magazine for the engineering design of the bicycle that printed chalk text messages sent through SMS and from my website onto streets and sidewalks in NYC. Apparently, the NYPD considered this project to be a threat and was determined to shut it down. They had a copy of the Popular Science article in a file along with 4 pages of notes as to why my project was a threat. This led to my bizarre arrest, which happened on national television while I was being interviewed by Ron Reagan on MSNBC's Hardball. I was arrested with no crime being committed. Just simply plucked from the street, jailed for 24 hours, and my computer, cell phone and bicycle confiscated and held for over a year (the bicycle was never returned). The fake charges against me were dropped 6 months later. The NYTimes article confirms what I had long suspected -- that the NYPD was unlawfully conducting surveillance of artists, activists, and others seeking to exercise free speech at the RNC convention in 2004. Here are the videos: The Bike Project http://www.bikesagainstbush.com/blog/iloveny.mov The Arrest -- Street Footage http://www.bikesagainstbush.com/blog/bikesarrest.mov MSNBC Interview http://www.bikesagainstbush.com/blog/msnbc_8-29-2004_med1.mov BikesAgainstBush was important because it was one of the earliest demonstrations of the power of the blogosphere to distribute video -- the raw street-footage of the arrest circulated around the blogosphere and was viewed by millions of people both before and after the edited version aired on MSNBC's Hardball. Immediately after
[videoblogging] Re: vlogweek '07 update
Hi Jan, Thanks for the feedback. We've been putting a lot of time into making sure Mefeedia grabs tags from as many possible options that people have available to them for tagging a video post. I'm looking forward to watching all of the great videos that will be coming out of videoblogging week 2007! -Frank Frank Sinton CEO, Mefeedia [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mefeedia.com - 2,219,533 episodes from 22,818 video feeds across 13,565 websites Our blog: http://mefeedia.com/blog --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon Duthie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Jan, that's a better way of what I was trying to say. Use all the main tagging services you can handle, not just one. I think we've fixed up the blogger-mf formatting, please let me/us know if you see something that looks goofy. The new changes related to tagging involve parsing the description, content and content:encoded of the rss item/post for rel=tag (this should be in everyone's workflow imho) as well as adding keywords from media:keywords, media:category and itunes:keywords. I was pretty surprised how many people don't tag their clips. (...sorry sull, it's a very bad, bad morning...mea culpa?) -- Devlon Jan McLaughlin wrote: Let's use all the tagging services (Blip, Mefeedia, Delicious, Technorati) and see which keeps track best. Take half a dozen vloggers who post every day of VBW and first thing 4/8 run 'em through the test mill with screenshots of the results Mefeedia's gonna have to do something outstanding to have me drag them back into my burgeoning workflow. It kinda lost me when the formatting from Blogger -- Mefeedia stopped translating well. I couldn't bear to look at the destruction the cross-post wrought. Do Mefeedia and Technorati read / recognize Blip's tags? Jan On 3/25/07, Devlon Duthie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey sull, That wasn't my point, and (that time) I wasn't even touting Mefeedia. I just remember all the fuss last year when technorati wasn't keeping up with the tags...and that I missed the discussion, was curious to hear what wonderous things had been discussed. Since we figured there might be a lapse in tag tracking this year, we have spent a bit of effort to see if we can keep up with Videobloggingweekand some of that effort has been in rounding out the tags that we parse from the rss post. So, the short answer, is we track tags as they come in from the posts and also you can tag clips at Mefeedia. ...and you don't have to enlighten me on how this community works sull, I know all too well :) Thanks, Devlon sull wrote: I'd love to see more people get behind and support mefeedia. But this community doesnt work that way (not even the active 8%). And nor should they nec be groupies to a broad interpretation of Net Video Culture. It's not easy sustaining a community of people solely on the premise of technology adoption. Still, mefeedia will be involved with vbw07 in some way or another... Lists, Guides, tags Remind me, does mefeedia track tags from blog posts or do you have to tag stuff locally on mefeedia site? Sull On 3/24/07, Devlon Duthie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did I miss the discussion on depending on technorati this year for tracking our tags? -Devlon Josh Leo wrote: Ok folks, we are one week away from Videobloggingweek2007 I usually don't do themes for videoblogging week, but i know it helps other people so lets knock out some ideas for themes adn then pick them. So far all I have seriously heard was the 7 deadly sins we have agreed on the technorati tag, now we need to nail out some other details. so what do we want videoblogging week to look like this year? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [videoblogging] Re: My videoblogging roots and today's NYTimes article
Wow. I could do a few pages on this, but I won't. There is an amazing documentary by Adam Curtis, part 3/3 on tonight on BBC2 at 9pm. It's called The Trap, and it's about how we are losing/have lost our freedom. It's very, very good. All Brits on the list should check it out. Everybody else can check it out in several parts at http:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVZBkelUft8 It will play on PBS later this year, like his previous doc The Power Of Nightmares. I feel a bit embarrassed to be linking to a BBC documentary from a mainstream doc director here. I know I'm not alone in having all these hopes for what online distributed media and particularly video can do to help change tyrannical bureaucratic secretive abuse of power like this and break the illusion of our impotence. I keep telling myself Be The Change You Wish To See In The World, and trying to find ways to make this happen in my life through online video. I'm not there yet, but this group (tying back into Harold's thread) has obliquely and unwittingly helped me make quite amazing personal and political realizations over time and some of the stuff you all do I find buttock-tighteningly inspiring. Regardless of social dynamics, which I believe are considerably less poisonous and more accepting here than in other places. Rupert http://www.fatgirlinohio.org http://www.crowdabout.us/fatgirlinohio/myshow/ On 25 Mar 2007, at 20:19, Gena wrote: Joshua, I woke up this morning and heard a brief story on NPR about this. I said to myself, I'm probably in some dang database. I heard something about an RNC/NYPD work task force. For those outside the U.S. http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/03/25/news/protest.php This is a direct result of an imperial presidency and the PATRIOT Act. And yeah, I've suspected that we had/have increase scrutiny from certain governmental agencies in this list as well. I could say that it is a perverse badge of honor. But that may be a little too optimistic spin on this. I could bring up ancient anger and say that this is what we get when Americans collectively chose not to participate in the process of elections. That this is what we get when in fear mode we permit all kinds of abuses in the name of safety. My country tis of thee? Sometimes yes, lately ??? This is one instance where being African-American helps me to cope with this kind of thing. It happens. You were not a person. You were an objective. A Not Like Us person. The Other. It will continue to happen until attention is focused on this event. NYPD has to be made to feel so uncomfortable that it will promises heaven and earth not to do it again. Unlikely but possible. Be angry. Be aggressive in finding out the complete truth and be strong in your conviction that you were exercising your rights as a citizen. After you do all of that. Acceptance. The acceptance part is that you and your rights were violated. As you think about it more it is gonna eat at you. You will need to find a healthy way to discharge that energy. It will take some time. Because you are going to realize just how deep this cuts and the number of layers this is going to penetrate your being. The best metaphor I can give you is in the winter when the wind blows. You are standing there. The wind blows. Because of the wind chill factor it feel much colder than what it is in reality. You have two choices: One is to clench up and take it full blast - this will ensure the shivers. Discomfort. A loss of personal power. Until it stops. Two is to accept the wind and allow it to pass through you. You are still cold but you decide what you will and will not latch on to as you deal with this situation. I wish I had better words for you. I know what I'm trying to say but it isn't coming out right. So I'll stop with do the best you can. ...peace, be still Gena --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Today, I'm unsure how to react to this news -- having your person, property and rights violated is an unsettling experience. Would definitely like to hear your thoughts on this as I'm processing the information. On Friday morning, I was informed by a NYTimes reporter that recent documents uncovered just how far the NYPD went to suppress Free Speech -- mine and others -- at the Republican Convention in 2004. Here's what the NYTimes reported in the Sunday edition: City Police Spied Broadly Before G.O.P. Convention http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/25/nyregion/25infiltrate.html? ex=1332561600en=3af0cd0ac568e430ei=5124partner=permalinkexprod=perma link Bikes Against Bush http://www.bikesagainstbush.com was my graduate thesis project, a combination of mechanical engineering, WiFi, interactive mobile messaging, and videoblogging. It was featured in Popular Science magazine for the engineering design of the bicycle that printed chalk text messages sent through SMS and from my website onto streets
Re: [videoblogging] Re: BikiniZero.com Tech News Bikini-Driven!
And as Raymond says, do not let us forget [to ask] the [hard] questions. This is a difficult one for sure. It is stooping to use boobs; shooting fish in a barrel. Not much sport in it. That's my biggest problem with it. Why calculate the lowest common denominator when the high denominator is so much more fun? Jan On 3/25/07, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jan McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't f'in' get me started. Aw crap. Here it comes... The lesson: women must take better / more directed advantage of silly men. They are totally at our mercy. What is it we women really want? Why don't more women create these shows and make $ off 'em? I know there's a reason. Can it be a good reason? Jan I hadn't given any thought to the statistics behind whether it's men or women that exploit the advantage over silly men of sex sells, but I'd have to guess that you're right and that there aren't enough women behind the camera as it were in these situations. Women are being 'used' to drive interest in shows or websites, but other than being hired as on-air talent, they're probably not too involved in the process. I wonder how tough it would be for a group of women to get together and create a production company or whatever to 'exploit' their own (meaning women in general, not THE women of the production company. :D) aesthetic advantages. A possible reason why not is that ambitious women wouldn't be inclined to 'stoop so low' to add to the stereotype of utilizing sex or sexuality to make a profit. Who knows? Interesting question. :D -- Bill C. http://TheLab.ReelSolid.TV Yahoo! Groups Links -- The Faux Press - better than real http://fauxpress.blogspot.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: My videoblogging roots and today's NYTimes article
Did that stop you in your activist tracks, Josh? Or perhaps having invented FireANT is a deeper gesture of activism? It certainly has helped me wean m'self away from the mainstream that was moving my brain toward uselessness. I'm proud of you, Josh; sorry you have to feel this violation again. Oh boy. Jan On 3/25/07, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wow. I could do a few pages on this, but I won't. There is an amazing documentary by Adam Curtis, part 3/3 on tonight on BBC2 at 9pm. It's called The Trap, and it's about how we are losing/have lost our freedom. It's very, very good. All Brits on the list should check it out. Everybody else can check it out in several parts at http:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVZBkelUft8 It will play on PBS later this year, like his previous doc The Power Of Nightmares. I feel a bit embarrassed to be linking to a BBC documentary from a mainstream doc director here. I know I'm not alone in having all these hopes for what online distributed media and particularly video can do to help change tyrannical bureaucratic secretive abuse of power like this and break the illusion of our impotence. I keep telling myself Be The Change You Wish To See In The World, and trying to find ways to make this happen in my life through online video. I'm not there yet, but this group (tying back into Harold's thread) has obliquely and unwittingly helped me make quite amazing personal and political realizations over time and some of the stuff you all do I find buttock-tighteningly inspiring. Regardless of social dynamics, which I believe are considerably less poisonous and more accepting here than in other places. Rupert http://www.fatgirlinohio.org http://www.crowdabout.us/fatgirlinohio/myshow/ On 25 Mar 2007, at 20:19, Gena wrote: Joshua, I woke up this morning and heard a brief story on NPR about this. I said to myself, I'm probably in some dang database. I heard something about an RNC/NYPD work task force. For those outside the U.S. http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/03/25/news/protest.php This is a direct result of an imperial presidency and the PATRIOT Act. And yeah, I've suspected that we had/have increase scrutiny from certain governmental agencies in this list as well. I could say that it is a perverse badge of honor. But that may be a little too optimistic spin on this. I could bring up ancient anger and say that this is what we get when Americans collectively chose not to participate in the process of elections. That this is what we get when in fear mode we permit all kinds of abuses in the name of safety. My country tis of thee? Sometimes yes, lately ??? This is one instance where being African-American helps me to cope with this kind of thing. It happens. You were not a person. You were an objective. A Not Like Us person. The Other. It will continue to happen until attention is focused on this event. NYPD has to be made to feel so uncomfortable that it will promises heaven and earth not to do it again. Unlikely but possible. Be angry. Be aggressive in finding out the complete truth and be strong in your conviction that you were exercising your rights as a citizen. After you do all of that. Acceptance. The acceptance part is that you and your rights were violated. As you think about it more it is gonna eat at you. You will need to find a healthy way to discharge that energy. It will take some time. Because you are going to realize just how deep this cuts and the number of layers this is going to penetrate your being. The best metaphor I can give you is in the winter when the wind blows. You are standing there. The wind blows. Because of the wind chill factor it feel much colder than what it is in reality. You have two choices: One is to clench up and take it full blast - this will ensure the shivers. Discomfort. A loss of personal power. Until it stops. Two is to accept the wind and allow it to pass through you. You are still cold but you decide what you will and will not latch on to as you deal with this situation. I wish I had better words for you. I know what I'm trying to say but it isn't coming out right. So I'll stop with do the best you can. ...peace, be still Gena --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Today, I'm unsure how to react to this news -- having your person, property and rights violated is an unsettling experience. Would definitely like to hear your thoughts on this as I'm processing the information. On Friday morning, I was informed by a NYTimes reporter that recent documents uncovered just how far the NYPD went to suppress Free Speech -- mine and others -- at the Republican Convention in 2004. Here's what the NYTimes reported in the Sunday edition: City Police Spied Broadly Before G.O.P. Convention http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/25/nyregion/25infiltrate.html?
Re: [videoblogging] Re: vlogweek '07 update
permalink for vlog-week images: *http://tinyurl.com/2g9qb4* http://videobloggingweek2007.blogspot.com/2007/03/videoblogging-week-images.html On 25 Mar 2007 12:23:37 -0700, Frank Sinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Jan, Thanks for the feedback. We've been putting a lot of time into making sure Mefeedia grabs tags from as many possible options that people have available to them for tagging a video post. I'm looking forward to watching all of the great videos that will be coming out of videoblogging week 2007! -Frank Frank Sinton CEO, Mefeedia [EMAIL PROTECTED] frank%40mefeedia.com http://www.mefeedia.com - 2,219,533 episodes from 22,818 video feeds across 13,565 websites Our blog: http://mefeedia.com/blog --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, Devlon Duthie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Jan, that's a better way of what I was trying to say. Use all the main tagging services you can handle, not just one. I think we've fixed up the blogger-mf formatting, please let me/us know if you see something that looks goofy. The new changes related to tagging involve parsing the description, content and content:encoded of the rss item/post for rel=tag (this should be in everyone's workflow imho) as well as adding keywords from media:keywords, media:category and itunes:keywords. I was pretty surprised how many people don't tag their clips. (...sorry sull, it's a very bad, bad morning...mea culpa?) -- Devlon Jan McLaughlin wrote: Let's use all the tagging services (Blip, Mefeedia, Delicious, Technorati) and see which keeps track best. Take half a dozen vloggers who post every day of VBW and first thing 4/8 run 'em through the test mill with screenshots of the results Mefeedia's gonna have to do something outstanding to have me drag them back into my burgeoning workflow. It kinda lost me when the formatting from Blogger -- Mefeedia stopped translating well. I couldn't bear to look at the destruction the cross-post wrought. Do Mefeedia and Technorati read / recognize Blip's tags? Jan On 3/25/07, Devlon Duthie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey sull, That wasn't my point, and (that time) I wasn't even touting Mefeedia. I just remember all the fuss last year when technorati wasn't keeping up with the tags...and that I missed the discussion, was curious to hear what wonderous things had been discussed. Since we figured there might be a lapse in tag tracking this year, we have spent a bit of effort to see if we can keep up with Videobloggingweekand some of that effort has been in rounding out the tags that we parse from the rss post. So, the short answer, is we track tags as they come in from the posts and also you can tag clips at Mefeedia. ...and you don't have to enlighten me on how this community works sull, I know all too well :) Thanks, Devlon sull wrote: I'd love to see more people get behind and support mefeedia. But this community doesnt work that way (not even the active 8%). And nor should they nec be groupies to a broad interpretation of Net Video Culture. It's not easy sustaining a community of people solely on the premise of technology adoption. Still, mefeedia will be involved with vbw07 in some way or another... Lists, Guides, tags Remind me, does mefeedia track tags from blog posts or do you have to tag stuff locally on mefeedia site? Sull On 3/24/07, Devlon Duthie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did I miss the discussion on depending on technorati this year for tracking our tags? -Devlon Josh Leo wrote: Ok folks, we are one week away from Videobloggingweek2007 I usually don't do themes for videoblogging week, but i know it helps other people so lets knock out some ideas for themes adn then pick them. So far all I have seriously heard was the 7 deadly sins we have agreed on the technorati tag, now we need to nail out some other details. so what do we want videoblogging week to look like this year? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links -- Josh Leo www.JoshLeo.com www.WanderingWestMichigan.com www.SlowLorisMedia.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: Research into Videoblogging and Videoblogs - call for help
hi all, just wanted to say a big thank you to those of you who have written to me already, I've sent the questions along from my university email, so hopefully they've not got lost into anyone's spam filters. Also, if anyone's intersted in helping out, I am still looking for volunteers, so drop me a line. many thanks trine On 3/22/07, trine bjørkmann berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Some of you might know (of) me already, but for those of you who don't, I am a researcher in Media Film at the University of Sussex, UK, and am currently writing my thesis on Videoblogging. Part of my study is conducting interviews with videobloggers, and I am currently looking for volunteers. I'd be really grateful if you would spare a little of your time to tell me about your site. If you agree to help, I'll mail you a few questions off list. Your answers can be as long or short as you like. You could really help me by spending as little as 10 minutes telling me about your experiences. In anything I use from what you say, I will make sure that no clues are given to your identity. I hope you will help. Sorry to have wasted your time if you're not interested. Many thanks Trine B Berry Doctoral Candidate Department of Media Film University of Sussex [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sussex.ac.uk/mediastudies/profile185401.html -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] trine.blogs.com twitter.com/trine
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Research into Videoblogging and Videoblogs - call for help
Ha! Irresistible. I'm in. Jan On 3/25/07, trine bjørkmann berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi all, just wanted to say a big thank you to those of you who have written to me already, I've sent the questions along from my university email, so hopefully they've not got lost into anyone's spam filters. Also, if anyone's intersted in helping out, I am still looking for volunteers, so drop me a line. many thanks trine On 3/22/07, trine bjørkmann berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Some of you might know (of) me already, but for those of you who don't, I am a researcher in Media Film at the University of Sussex, UK, and am currently writing my thesis on Videoblogging. Part of my study is conducting interviews with videobloggers, and I am currently looking for volunteers. I'd be really grateful if you would spare a little of your time to tell me about your site. If you agree to help, I'll mail you a few questions off list. Your answers can be as long or short as you like. You could really help me by spending as little as 10 minutes telling me about your experiences. In anything I use from what you say, I will make sure that no clues are given to your identity. I hope you will help. Sorry to have wasted your time if you're not interested. Many thanks Trine B Berry Doctoral Candidate Department of Media Film University of Sussex [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sussex.ac.uk/mediastudies/profile185401.html -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] trine.blogs.com twitter.com/trine Yahoo! Groups Links -- The Faux Press - better than real http://fauxpress.blogspot.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] vlogweek '07 update
On 3/25/07, Jan McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let's use all the tagging services (Blip, Mefeedia, Delicious, Technorati) and see which keeps track best. It's a track-off. LOL Jan, even though videoblogging week is truely about making media, thank you for your feedback on the technical aspects. They're much appreciated. That goes for everyone. I'm sure the tech will descend to the background as we get nearer videoblogging week so we can focus on all the beautiful content. Speaking of which, I am planning on participating this year, but I may be a little off them. Being as how I can never fully remove myself from the tech. I'm going to vlog completely from the Linux operating system and using only open source tools. It's a great exuse for me to get an intimate understanding of how close vlogging is to breaching the digital divide. I do believe linux is the key. Maybe I can actuall make some screen casts. :) Geeky me. I just can't wait until we decide on a theme! I hope we've not swayed the focus, mefeedia is not sponsoring vbweek, we're not co-oping it we're just taking the opportunity to test metal and see if we can't do right by the community and fill in that gap left by services like technorati which isn't focused on media, and working with brother and sister tools like blip, dabble, delicious and others... we can track videoblogging week across any service INCLUDING youtube just as long as that service fully supports RSS 2.0 and MediaRSS. and wil I love that the majority of vloggers here care enough to craft their own vlogging experience I really hope we cast a wider net and get people participating on services from revver, to youtube, to Vimeo and others. We're even starting to work on platforms like second life to get video and audio podcast syndicated to and from sl. But all this is just good sentiment. What it comes down to now is it either works or doesnt... either people will only be able to collaborate really well within the context of great but ultimately closed serices like Flickr and Youtube... or Dabble, mefeedia and other trackers and searchers to follow will increasingly find ways to bring those sollaborative mechanisms OUT of the walled gardens and build the infrastructure to make robust interoperable collaborative and social spaces no matter where you host your vlog, post your media or otherwise. Take half a dozen vloggers who post every day of VBW and first thing 4/8 run 'em through the test mill with screenshots of the results We would love your continued critique. And I think it might be good for others if they're listening too. Which reminds me... I need to take a new look at SpinXpress. They seem to be on the other end of the spectrum... i.e. private, non-public media collaboration, but I'm curious if there aren't more ways to open spin express up so that there can't be more public space for intereaction with it to... i.e. does spin express do RSS? Can I subscribe to a project feed either with a private secure RSS feed or a public one? I lament that I haven't had more time to play with it. Mefeedia's gonna have to do something outstanding to have me drag them back into my burgeoning workflow. We'll get cha'. Thanks to frank we finally have the resources to follow through on many of the projects we've been dying to work on. :) It kinda lost me when the formatting from Blogger -- Mefeedia stopped translating well. I couldn't bear to look at the destruction the cross-post wrought. We've done MANY huge improvements, special thanks to Devlon, on tag aggregation and I'm sur if you check any and all your feeds we're now grabing your tags. If we're not let us know. This does remind me though that Blogger.com 2.0 has a new mechanism for tagging posts. It's called labels. That's a good question for Devlon. Does mefeedia handle blogger.com's new labels? Labels is new in blogger.com 2.0. I don't know how it's included in the RSS feeds, just that it should be included somehow because Technoratti picks up on it. Do Mefeedia and Technorati read / recognize Blip's tags? Jan, absolutely. Blip specifies their tags in RSS and mediaRSS. Mefeedia will pick up tags just as long as they are included when you upload the video... if you are however tagging your videos after you post them to blip... say 12 or more hours later and mefeedia has already crawled your blip feed there is a chance we may miss them as I don't believe we re check old posts for new tags. This is typical of the way RSS works though. The question is for blip. If you are tagging on blip and then cross posting to your blog do they include tags in the cross post using the technorati proposed rel=tag satandard? I've recently been talking a lot about how cross posting from blip (and other services) is the weak link in the meta-info chain. Blip has all sorts of great meta info such as geolocation info, thumbnails, alternate video formats like flash, and so much more but when that information is
Re: [videoblogging] vlogweek '07 update
On 3/25/07, Devlon Duthie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Jan, that's a better way of what I was trying to say. Use all the main tagging services you can handle, not just one. I think we've fixed up the blogger-mf formatting, please let me/us know if you see something that looks goofy. The new changes related to tagging involve parsing the description, content and content:encoded of the rss item/post for rel=tag (this should be in everyone's workflow imho) as well as adding keywords from media:keywords, media:category and itunes:keywords. how does blogger.com 2.0 specify it's new category system it calls labels? Do you know off hand? I was pretty surprised how many people don't tag their clips. I was pretty suprised how many people do! :) (...sorry sull, it's a very bad, bad morning...mea culpa?) -- Devlon Jan McLaughlin wrote: Let's use all the tagging services (Blip, Mefeedia, Delicious, Technorati) and see which keeps track best. Take half a dozen vloggers who post every day of VBW and first thing 4/8 run 'em through the test mill with screenshots of the results Mefeedia's gonna have to do something outstanding to have me drag them back into my burgeoning workflow. It kinda lost me when the formatting from Blogger -- Mefeedia stopped translating well. I couldn't bear to look at the destruction the cross-post wrought. Do Mefeedia and Technorati read / recognize Blip's tags? Jan On 3/25/07, Devlon Duthie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey sull, That wasn't my point, and (that time) I wasn't even touting Mefeedia. I just remember all the fuss last year when technorati wasn't keeping up with the tags...and that I missed the discussion, was curious to hear what wonderous things had been discussed. Since we figured there might be a lapse in tag tracking this year, we have spent a bit of effort to see if we can keep up with Videobloggingweekand some of that effort has been in rounding out the tags that we parse from the rss post. So, the short answer, is we track tags as they come in from the posts and also you can tag clips at Mefeedia. ...and you don't have to enlighten me on how this community works sull, I know all too well :) Thanks, Devlon sull wrote: I'd love to see more people get behind and support mefeedia. But this community doesnt work that way (not even the active 8%). And nor should they nec be groupies to a broad interpretation of Net Video Culture. It's not easy sustaining a community of people solely on the premise of technology adoption. Still, mefeedia will be involved with vbw07 in some way or another... Lists, Guides, tags Remind me, does mefeedia track tags from blog posts or do you have to tag stuff locally on mefeedia site? Sull On 3/24/07, Devlon Duthie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did I miss the discussion on depending on technorati this year for tracking our tags? -Devlon Josh Leo wrote: Ok folks, we are one week away from Videobloggingweek2007 I usually don't do themes for videoblogging week, but i know it helps other people so lets knock out some ideas for themes adn then pick them. So far all I have seriously heard was the 7 deadly sins we have agreed on the technorati tag, now we need to nail out some other details. so what do we want videoblogging week to look like this year? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Local TV Covers my Vlog
On 3/25/07, Mike Moon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I sent a comment to the Fox site asking for the link to the vlogger in the story or to post the link with the story. :) Now they did ask for my 5 digit zipcode... and well, I only know one... 90210. :) LOL! You're diabolical Mike.. But what's with them asking for YOUR zip code. I hope you did a quick lookup and gave them a zip from local St. Louis though it shouldn't make a difference. :) So... have they responded yet with the info? -Mike Mike http://vlog.mikemoon.net --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think I got some traffic out of it but it's hard to track because they didn't actually link back to my vlog. Which was an oversight on the part of the web management people according to the reporter who did the piece--and they still haven't fixed it yet. It would have been nice to see it linked when the story was actually posted--especially since the anchor said on air that it would be linked after the story ran... morons. Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com www.billstreeter.net --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, groups-yahoo-com@ wrote: Wow, just wow. First, Congrats again bill! I wonder if you'll get more local viewers out of it? Second... flash... not windows media player, not real player... I can actually play it in my browser. Wow, we've come a long way in the last two years. Now all they need is some sharing features like source and a downloadable mp4 in their RSS feed so I can revlog it. Third... wow again... it's actually not BAD... in fact I don't want to go crazy but it's maybe even a good representation of vlogging. BTW, what was with the washed out colors... that was just weird... it's like the hole thing was digitized by putting a camera on the TV screen. The macintosh video was completely white. :) Finally, that hillary clinton video... I still haven't seen it... but what's funny is that WASN'T just some vlogger... it was created and then leaked by a PR guy at a major political PR firm that does work for Obama among others. It's a complete misrepresentation of vlogging, but I just think it's funny. Mainstream media goes out to report on vlogging and ends up reporting on their own echo chamber. Are we even here? -Mike mmeiser.com/blog mefeedia.com On 3/24/07, Richard (Show) Hall richard@ wrote: Bill, This is really a nice news piece. Congratulations, and good luck with your bungalow ... Richard On 23 Mar 2007 05:02:47 -0700, Bill Streeter bill@ wrote: Our local Fox afiliate did a story about my vlog and vlogging in general last night. It's online now you can see it here: http://tinyurl.com/yvwjhw Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com www.billstreeter.net -- Richard http://richardhhall.org Shows http://richardshow.org http://inspiredhealing.tv [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Let's Help The Others, As We Used To, To Vlog
YAY! i reckon you get what you come for. despite some people knowing each other, it's not a personal space. i think if you come here seeking tech knowledge, there's no better place to get it. if you come here to give - to flex mental muscles, talk about online video in a wider sense or share knowledge - there's still no more satisfying place i think. even if conversations tail off, get repeated, fragment, get distracted. as sull suggests, there IS room for a space to develop innovative ideas and philosophize in a more focussed way, but that will take nothing away from this place. if you come here to make friends, get in with people, or boost your vlog viewership, you're going to have problems because that's not what it's about and it's too chaotic and open to service anybody's ego or needs. go to a meetup, or be yourself on your vlog and correspond with viewers, or email/IM/twitter with people offlist, or whatever. sure there are lots of people who know each other and of course there's an aura of knowledge and experience around the folks who have been doing this for years, but i think it's 99% about knowledge and experience, not how cool you are. and i think those people use this forum very responsibly, hardly ever to pal around and show off about their friendships in a Myspace/Youtube way (or like on a lot of other Groups). i like writing a lot here at the moment, and i'm interested in a lot of what i read, but i don't expect anything personal from anybody. what it is for me is a place to develop an interest about a specific thing that i can't do anywhere else, in real life or online. i might get a vague sense of whether i'd get on with people if i ever met them outside this list - but that's for outside the list. Rupert http://www.fatgirlinohio.org http://www.crowdabout.us/fatgirlinohio/myshow/ On 25 Mar 2007, at 17:50, ryanne hodson wrote: i think the elitist label is bullshit. i think this list is great people are welcome to rant and rave and get to the nitty gritty of online video hell meiser and watkins post novels every day... and it's insane how much people help each other tirelessly on this list to figure out tech stuff. i've been on other lists of videomakers and people aren't nearly as helpful as on this list. usually the answers/attitudes are just google it or go find it on a message board so i'd like to sing the praises of this group. after visiting the cold harsh lists of other video groups i gladly return to the videoblogging list for a passionate rant and friendly fisticuffs daily. (ok it's more than that) as for helping people watkins are you holding any events? are you getting people to videoblog? i think the list you stated is a good example of what people in this community are capable and willing to create and i think that's pretty fucking amazing. and if you don't think that's enough it's up to you (and anyone really) to do something about it. i love the videoblogging list no matter how crazy it can get. -ryanne On 24 Mar 2007 16:55:12 -0700, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cheers, although I dont actually think that stuff was a problem or really a reflection of any problems the group may have. I spend so much time here stating my opinions, that I cant really complain if anybody else ever states an opinion about me. I think its quite normal that people would maybe treat my opinions on vlogging differently if I actually vlogged a lot and they could 'see me' more. If I had ever had a sucessful web business then my opinions on other businesses might be taken differently by some, etc etc. And I can see why it might seem weird to spend so much time on a blogging group and reading and whining my opinions, when Im not blogging, vlogging or doing a business or even having all that much time to watch video. Anyways, I have been someone who moaned here and there about elitism or some other aspects of this group, but Ive also been fairly negative about possible alternatives. For me the group is healthy if opinions are diverse, so I wouldnt mind a few elitist comments here and there as it would reflect the fact there must be someone somewher who holds such views. Just so long as the whole group doesnt suffer from such things. Same with clique stuff, I think there may have been some tendencies towards this but it was never the whole group, it was clumps of people or even just one person using wording that might have sounded elitist, and maybe was or wasnt, it never usually got explored in depth, possibly because the label 'elitist' sounds negative so not many people think they are guilty of that. Some of the things that might put newcomers off this group are accidental or systemic, or chance. For example there are still threads people post that never get responded to. If its someone like me posting then it doesnt really matter because I post a
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Local TV Covers my Vlog
On 3/25/07, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think I got some traffic out of it but it's hard to track because they didn't actually link back to my vlog. Which was an oversight on the part of the web management people according to the reporter who did the piece--and they still haven't fixed it yet. It would have been nice to see it linked when the story was actually posted--especially since the anchor said on air that it would be linked after the story ran... morons. All I can say is this is why I LOVE your intro... it's an infectious and GOOD jingle that repeats your name both visually and audibly... lo fi st. lous rock n roll rock n roll lo fi st. louis. We must remember while all these high-tech things like URLS work in the webby world in the video world it's all about the age old cognitive issues... like naratives, story telling, melody, catchy advertising jingles, repetition, branding and so on. I think if someone saw the piece and were interested and even remotely internet savy they'd be able to google you pretty quick with no problem. We've discussed brand here on the yahoo group before promting many people to create their own domain names like michaelverdi.com or yourname.com... or yourprimaryinterest.com and I'm glad to see most people are pretty savy. Also we've discussed always putting your domain name in the outro... yet more great advice. Perhaps now it's time to up the anti and discuss the value of DAMN good intros. Quite frankly... if I was a professional videographer... and not just a tech geek who loves vlogs... I'd either make or hire you and or chriss weagel to make me the best intro ever. Chri's intro for his sister Sara's vlog Sara's Corner was perhaps the best intro ever. These intro's are important not just because they're memerable, but because they remind people about what the vlog is about i.e rock n roll, rock n roll or it's about me! Sarah! but because they remind us of what we love best about these vlogs. BTW! The other aspect that I think comes across really well is it's important to be the narrator and get in front of the camera... One of the most obvious aspects of the news piece to me is that Bill Streeter is this guy... and this is what he looks like... and this is what he likes to do hall his drinking buddy around to shows and cover unique and interesting people in St. Louis. I do wonder... if you bill hadn't started appearing in front of the camera on occassion in your shows would the local TV network have bothered to call you. I think people instinctually gravitate toward people they can identify with. And... while it's not for everyone... i.e. me... I do think reporters, press, and everyday listeners will continue to tune in with personalities... and not just shows. Call it the Ze Frank effect... I think his insane editing and exagerated focus on personality and face time drives this point home like no other. Even more so then other popular shows like Ask A Ninga, or Rocketboom... Need I mention Brookers or LisaNova... if the medium is the message, then the messages is new media is about PEOPLE stupid! LOL This goes for blogging and podcasting as well. Oh, the power of a picture of your face on your profile / blog / video. To recap... 1) domain name... always include your domain name somwehre visually in your vlog 2) intro... snappy short intros that emphasis what your vlog is about and who you are... and the name of your vlog rule... because you can't always expect people to remember a silly domain name... most people have a cognitive aversion to remembering domain names. 3) get in front of the camera... if you dare... best thing you can do. That about sums this email up. Well... I'll shut up now. -Mike Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com www.billstreeter.net --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wow, just wow. First, Congrats again bill! I wonder if you'll get more local viewers out of it? Second... flash... not windows media player, not real player... I can actually play it in my browser. Wow, we've come a long way in the last two years. Now all they need is some sharing features like source and a downloadable mp4 in their RSS feed so I can revlog it. Third... wow again... it's actually not BAD... in fact I don't want to go crazy but it's maybe even a good representation of vlogging. BTW, what was with the washed out colors... that was just weird... it's like the hole thing was digitized by putting a camera on the TV screen. The macintosh video was completely white. :) Finally, that hillary clinton video... I still haven't seen it... but what's funny is that WASN'T just some vlogger... it was created and then leaked by a PR guy at a major political PR firm that does work for Obama among others. It's a complete misrepresentation of vlogging, but I just think it's funny. Mainstream media goes out to report on vlogging and
Re: [videoblogging] My videoblogging roots and today's NYTimes article
Excuse me... but mother fucker! This confirms all my suspicious about the massive waste of resources and abuse of power that is the Patriot Act. You know this stuff goes on but rarely does it hit so close to home or present itself in such an obvous way. Granted not all examples are so wastefull.. but this is the fucking height of absuridity and abuse against free speech, civil rights, and worst of all intellectual and artful cultural exploration. It is now obvious that it was a completely politically motivated attempt to use the NYPD's resources to silence opposing speech against Bush and the RNC. They obviously saw the publicity of bikes against bush as some form of attractor, promotional, or escallating element bringing attention to the RNC and anti-bush movement at a time when the city wanted to reduce attention in the press of the subject matter and play down activity. We already know that the majority of all arrests from teh rallies and the critical mass bike ride around this time were thrown out... that they arrested people knowing full well they had no grounds purely to hold them in jails for 48-72 hours until after the RNC. The thing is they dirctly deprived you of your property and speech not just around the RNC but for months and MONTHS afterwards by confiscating and refusing to return your technology so you could demonstrate and present on it... This is particularly disturbng because it was a largely intellectual, artful and largely positive endevor. Indeed it functions in a space that Eyebeam and other artful and educational resources continue to funciton well with-in right now. I think you could in fact consider it an attack on the educational system that is NYU/ITP (or was it Parsons? I forget.) Did the school back you in any of this? I'm guessing not, but they should be backing up their students... they should have provided some legal council to you. It is in fact they that have lost our as much as you. So... did the police actually stake you out and wait for an opportunity to arrest you when they were on the street with your bike? It's not clear from the information I've yet read, but it seems to suggest they didn't simply happen upon you on the street. We all knew the charge of vandalism was bunk... now we see that it was not only bunk but that it may have been planned from the very beginning. It's begining to look like they literally staked you out and sent someone to arrest you on trumped up charges if need be... not the case of some officer bumping into you on the street as it had been originally presented, even if questionably. There's more than enough legal grounds and I hope you find a lawyer who's interested in a conter suit... not for the money... in fact give the lawyer all the money if need be... but to make a statement of this event for all our sakes. It's simply a disgusting abuse of power that makes me worry about our future. BTW, if they were possibly keeping an eye on you, how did they know you'd be on the street talking to Michael Regan of Hardball? Was it by any chance pre-anounced? Let's back up though with the questions. Right now what I'd like is a completely synopsis somewhere where I can link to it and blog about it. I was going to recommend you try and summarize it all up in a blog post, but I realize even for you the facts are evolving so I'd really sggest an open wiki. Perhaps PBwiki? My personal motivations are not so much in seeing some action come of this... though I think you should contact a lawyer... but intellectual. I hope we can document the facts of this case so it can be referred to and made presentable as a study for bloggers, activists, book writers, lawyers, journalists, professors. I personally find it an extremely interesting case and would certainly help gather the facts and details on a wiki. In fact I'll even start the wiki if you give it you yourself will agree to help with the facts and details. Indeed I think I should have hour enthusiastic blessing, because without your input much of the detail will be lost and the facts no doubt sketchy. Is there anyone else here interested in this proposed project. Speaking of which... I'm increasingly aware of the value in Josh Wolf's legal points... they are at the very height of legal argument today and in the coming years as the masses start shooting and sharing videos... that we and our cameras cannot and should not be turned into the eyes and ears of an orwellian style government surveilence system. Does anyone know if there's an information resource on this in wiki form? Maybe the place for this stuff might be on wikipedia in fact. If it's going to go up on wikipedia though it cannot be presented as original research it must in fact be footnoted and thoroughly referenced. While much tougher I think it's far more worthwhile and useful to work on wikipedia... I find the peer review process to be flexible enough, and critical enough to be be worthwhile. That's it from me
[videoblogging] eBay suspension lifted! WS auction back online.
The Wreck Salvage sponsorship auction is back online, finally. After a lot of faxed paperwork, and no formal explanation from anyone at eBay as to why we were suspended, we're finally selling sponsorships again. http://www.wreckandsalvage.com/auction It's is virtually impossible to talk to a live representative at eBay. They like to keep their customers at a virtual arm's length, and will reply when they are damn well ready to, and no sooner. All this being said, we're happy the suspension was lifted. It's dirt cheap right now, sorta stole our thunder. Get it while the getting is good.
[videoblogging] Apple TV
So has anyone got your mits on an Apple TV yet? Do you like it? Have you watched Rocket Boom or Ask a Ninja on Apple TV? Have you resized your videos to fit on Apple TV? Has Steve Garfield figured out a way to broadcast live on Apple TV from his cell phone yet?
RE: [videoblogging] Apple TV
Yes. Yes. Yes. Didn't need to. Not sure, Steve? :-) Robert _ From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Street Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 3:49 PM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: [videoblogging] Apple TV So has anyone got your mits on an Apple TV yet? Do you like it? Have you watched Rocket Boom or Ask a Ninja on Apple TV? Have you resized your videos to fit on Apple TV? Has Steve Garfield figured out a way to broadcast live on Apple TV from his cell phone yet? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: My videoblogging roots and today's NYTimes article
i'd definitely be interested in helping out on this project. i'm really glad to see issues like this come up on this forum:) Matt neovids.tv --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Excuse me... but mother fucker! This confirms all my suspicious about the massive waste of resources and abuse of power that is the Patriot Act. You know this stuff goes on but rarely does it hit so close to home or present itself in such an obvous way. Granted not all examples are so wastefull.. but this is the fucking height of absuridity and abuse against free speech, civil rights, and worst of all intellectual and artful cultural exploration. It is now obvious that it was a completely politically motivated attempt to use the NYPD's resources to silence opposing speech against Bush and the RNC. They obviously saw the publicity of bikes against bush as some form of attractor, promotional, or escallating element bringing attention to the RNC and anti-bush movement at a time when the city wanted to reduce attention in the press of the subject matter and play down activity. We already know that the majority of all arrests from teh rallies and the critical mass bike ride around this time were thrown out... that they arrested people knowing full well they had no grounds purely to hold them in jails for 48-72 hours until after the RNC. The thing is they dirctly deprived you of your property and speech not just around the RNC but for months and MONTHS afterwards by confiscating and refusing to return your technology so you could demonstrate and present on it... This is particularly disturbng because it was a largely intellectual, artful and largely positive endevor. Indeed it functions in a space that Eyebeam and other artful and educational resources continue to funciton well with-in right now. I think you could in fact consider it an attack on the educational system that is NYU/ITP (or was it Parsons? I forget.) Did the school back you in any of this? I'm guessing not, but they should be backing up their students... they should have provided some legal council to you. It is in fact they that have lost our as much as you. So... did the police actually stake you out and wait for an opportunity to arrest you when they were on the street with your bike? It's not clear from the information I've yet read, but it seems to suggest they didn't simply happen upon you on the street. We all knew the charge of vandalism was bunk... now we see that it was not only bunk but that it may have been planned from the very beginning. It's begining to look like they literally staked you out and sent someone to arrest you on trumped up charges if need be... not the case of some officer bumping into you on the street as it had been originally presented, even if questionably. There's more than enough legal grounds and I hope you find a lawyer who's interested in a conter suit... not for the money... in fact give the lawyer all the money if need be... but to make a statement of this event for all our sakes. It's simply a disgusting abuse of power that makes me worry about our future. BTW, if they were possibly keeping an eye on you, how did they know you'd be on the street talking to Michael Regan of Hardball? Was it by any chance pre-anounced? Let's back up though with the questions. Right now what I'd like is a completely synopsis somewhere where I can link to it and blog about it. I was going to recommend you try and summarize it all up in a blog post, but I realize even for you the facts are evolving so I'd really sggest an open wiki. Perhaps PBwiki? My personal motivations are not so much in seeing some action come of this... though I think you should contact a lawyer... but intellectual. I hope we can document the facts of this case so it can be referred to and made presentable as a study for bloggers, activists, book writers, lawyers, journalists, professors. I personally find it an extremely interesting case and would certainly help gather the facts and details on a wiki. In fact I'll even start the wiki if you give it you yourself will agree to help with the facts and details. Indeed I think I should have hour enthusiastic blessing, because without your input much of the detail will be lost and the facts no doubt sketchy. Is there anyone else here interested in this proposed project. Speaking of which... I'm increasingly aware of the value in Josh Wolf's legal points... they are at the very height of legal argument today and in the coming years as the masses start shooting and sharing videos... that we and our cameras cannot and should not be turned into the eyes and ears of an orwellian style government surveilence system. Does anyone know if there's an information resource on this in wiki form? Maybe the place for this stuff might be on wikipedia in fact. If it's going to go up on
[videoblogging] Youtube / vbweek07
So I just interrupted an interesting conversation on Twitter about whether this group is discriminating against the millions of YouTubers - are we informing them about videobloggingweek07? Obviously, they can tag their videos, but do any of them even know about it? The thrust of the question was, do we have an attitude of If It's Not Here, It's Not Real? I said I didn't think most people had that attitude - but it seemed to me that rather than it being about us rejecting youtubers, that it's more a question of most youtubers not being interested in what we do because the idea of this forum is irrelevant to them. they have their tech needs taken care of, and they have brand identity loyalty that gets in the way of them wanting to be part of a group of independent videobloggers. so my point was that the discrimination (for want of a better word) is on their part. but actually maybe it cuts both ways. we say we're open to them, but actually we know that the majority of what's discussed here is academic or alien to them and so they won't join in. we don't reach out to them, we just let it lie. a sin of omission, rather than commission. when we have an event like vbloggingweek, surely the onus is on those who know about it to market it to those who don't, rather than on them to break their habits and come beyond their walls. that way we will get more varied responses from the minority of YT users to whom it would appeal but who otherwise wouldn't hear about it. i'm all for that. there are 43 videos tagged for videobloggingweek06 on the whole of Youtube. Nothing for 07 under any variety of searches, and it's just a few days away. Josh Leo, you are a YouTube hero and VB week promoter... can you trail it to your zillion viewers?? :-) surely it's too big a pool of people to not reach out to? Rupert http://www.fatgirlinohio.org http://www.crowdabout.us/fatgirlinohio/myshow/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Apple TV
On 3/25/07, Tim Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So has anyone got your mits on an Apple TV yet? Just vlogged about it at MacMost.com: http://macmost.com/blog/video-tutorials/appletv-first-look/7/ -- Gary Rosenzweig CleverMedia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[videoblogging] The MSNBC story about Twitter
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17787810/ All about the rise and the future of Twitter. The best is saved for last, when the article credits the technology bloggers at SXSW for making Twitter so popular. I'm pretty sure that technology bloggers means the majority of people in this group.yes? Tony Katz http://www.talkshowonthego.com http://www.aweli.com
Re: [videoblogging] Apple TV
What resolution should we be resizing to if we want to work with Apple TV? Gary Rosenzweig wrote: On 3/25/07, Tim Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So has anyone got your mits on an Apple TV yet? Just vlogged about it at MacMost.com: http://macmost.com/blog/video-tutorials/appletv-first-look/7/
[videoblogging] Re: Apple TV
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=304974 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, J. Rhett Aultman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What resolution should we be resizing to if we want to work with Apple TV? Gary Rosenzweig wrote: On 3/25/07, Tim Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So has anyone got your mits on an Apple TV yet? Just vlogged about it at MacMost.com: http://macmost.com/blog/video-tutorials/appletv-first-look/7/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Apple TV
iTunes Store purchased video: 320 by 240 pixels or 640 by 480 pixels. Neither of which are widescreen, unless letterboxed. 320x240 must look not-very-great stretched out on a screen, unless it's played at original size on black bg? Is it? 640x480 probably looks OK, does it - still a bit pixellated? Largest it'll take is 1280 by 720 pixels at 24 fps (why 24? PAL is 25, NTSC is 30) or 960 by 540 pixels at 30 fps both of which must produce large file sizes? What's the best compromise? What mixes minimal distortion and file size? And how does it display non-widescreen video - with a left and right 'letterbox' or does it let TV handle that? Rupert http://www.fatgirlinohio.org http://www.crowdabout.us/fatgirlinohio/myshow/ On 26 Mar 2007, at 01:11, Tim Street wrote: http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=304974 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, J. Rhett Aultman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What resolution should we be resizing to if we want to work with Apple TV? Gary Rosenzweig wrote: On 3/25/07, Tim Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So has anyone got your mits on an Apple TV yet? Just vlogged about it at MacMost.com: http://macmost.com/blog/video-tutorials/appletv-first-look/7/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: Research into Videoblogging and Videoblogs - call for help
around the 25/3/07 trine bjørkmann berry mentioned about [videoblogging] Re: Research into Videoblogging and Videobl that: me already, I've sent the questions along from my university email, so hopefully they've not got lost into anyone's spam filters. Also, if anyone's intersted in helping out, I am still looking for volunteers, so drop me a line. happy to participate -- cheers Adrian Miles this email is bloggable [ ] ask first [ ] private [x] vogmae.net.au
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Research into Videoblogging and Videoblogs - call for help
sounds like fun, give me a list randy On 25 Mar 2007 17:50:37 -0700, Adrian Miles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: around the 25/3/07 trine bjørkmann berry mentioned about [videoblogging] Re: Research into Videoblogging and Videobl that: me already, I've sent the questions along from my university email, so hopefully they've not got lost into anyone's spam filters. Also, if anyone's intersted in helping out, I am still looking for volunteers, so drop me a line. happy to participate -- cheers Adrian Miles this email is bloggable [ ] ask first [ ] private [x] vogmae.net.au [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: Apple TV
The real question is have you watched LO-FI SAINT LOUIS on Apple TV yet? Huh? Didn't think so. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Tim Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So has anyone got your mits on an Apple TV yet? Do you like it? Have you watched Rocket Boom or Ask a Ninja on Apple TV? Have you resized your videos to fit on Apple TV? Has Steve Garfield figured out a way to broadcast live on Apple TV from his cell phone yet?
Re: [videoblogging] Youtube / vbweek07
when we have an event like vbloggingweek, surely the onus is on those who know about it to market it to those who don't, rather than on them to break their habits and come beyond their walls. that way we will get more varied responses from the minority of YT users to whom it would appeal but who otherwise wouldn't hear about it. i'm all for that. there are 43 videos tagged for videobloggingweek06 on the whole of Youtube. Nothing for 07 under any variety of searches, and it's just a few days away. Josh Leo, you are a YouTube hero and VB week promoter... can you trail it to your zillion viewers?? :-) surely it's too big a pool of people to not reach out to? this is absolutely a good idea. perfect time for someone to step up and make a promo video. as you say...i dont think anyone here discriminates against youtubers. our communities just have different tech needs and interests. but in the end...we're all making video. who has time to make some promos videos for VideoBlogging Week 2007 for Youtube? By the way...we're planning a pretty cool event this Saturday in SF to kick of the rest of the week. more details to come. Jay -- Here I am http://jaydedman.com Check out the latest project: http://pixelodeonfest.com/ Webvideo festival this June
Re: [videoblogging] Apple TV
I'm getting more interested since my friend blogged this point http://videothing.blogspot.com/2007/03/quicktime-gains-720p-apple-tv-high.html other links he blogged, of interest... http://videothing.blogspot.com/2007/03/macworld-video-macworld-video-exploring.html On 3/25/07, Tim Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So has anyone got your mits on an Apple TV yet? Do you like it? Have you watched Rocket Boom or Ask a Ninja on Apple TV? Have you resized your videos to fit on Apple TV? Has Steve Garfield figured out a way to broadcast live on Apple TV from his cell phone yet? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Apple TV
also noteworthy via Zadi: http://zadidiaz.com/blog/2007/03/jetset_on_appletv.html sull On 3/26/07, sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm getting more interested since my friend blogged this point http://videothing.blogspot.com/2007/03/quicktime-gains-720p-apple-tv-high.html other links he blogged, of interest... http://videothing.blogspot.com/2007/03/macworld-video-macworld-video-exploring.html On 3/25/07, Tim Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So has anyone got your mits on an Apple TV yet? Do you like it? Have you watched Rocket Boom or Ask a Ninja on Apple TV? Have you resized your videos to fit on Apple TV? Has Steve Garfield figured out a way to broadcast live on Apple TV from his cell phone yet? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: Apple TV
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: also noteworthy via Zadi: http://zadidiaz.com/blog/2007/03/jetset_on_appletv.html sull On 3/26/07, sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm getting more interested since my friend blogged this point http://videothing.blogspot.com/2007/03/quicktime-gains-720p-apple-tv-hi\ gh.html other links he blogged, of interest... http://videothing.blogspot.com/2007/03/macworld-video-macworld-video-ex\ ploring.html On 3/25/07, Tim Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So has anyone got your mits on an Apple TV yet? Do you like it? Have you watched Rocket Boom or Ask a Ninja on Apple TV? Have you resized your videos to fit on Apple TV? Has Steve Garfield figured out a way to broadcast live on Apple TV from his cell phone yet? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Apple TV
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I got my Apple TV on Friday. I'm liking it a lot. I've had a HDTV set for a few months but don't have HD service, so the Apple TV is the best looking video source in the house. It's only a matter of time before Apple sells HD content direct, but I've downloaded HD video podcasts and they look great. The only compression artifacts, I think, come from what the creator has to do to not have impossibly huge files and bandwidth bills. My first impressions blogged here: http://www.lightfantastic.org/imr/extras/weblog/archives/004649.html Ryan -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.2 (Build 4075) Comment: http://lightfantastic.org/pgp.txt wj8DBQFGB18Cz+jy50P8pxcRAnXkAJ0QnXAD51pmVrBFifRdBtwSgJRQgACaA1jM xDMz13cgv6SNvR5kPWXazx0= =nxc7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Re: Apple TV
Here's the current text on encoding for iPod / Apple TV, from a forthcoming version of the podcasting technical spec. Details may change slightly, so check the technical spec page for anything new: http://www.apple.com/itunes/store/podcaststechspecs.html = Formatting Video for the iPod or Apple TV Although iTunes can play a variety of .mp4, .m4v, and .mov video formats, Apple TV and the iPod require more specific formats. The iPod supports up to 640x480, while Apple TV supports up to 1280x720. To optimize for both platforms, we recommend that your source file is at least 640 pixels wide and that you use the built-in iPod converters in Compressor (H.264 for iPod), QuickTime Pro (Movie to iPod) or iTunes (Convert Selection for iPod). Each of these maintains the aspect ration of your source file and results in an M4V file containing H.264 video (Low Complexity version of the Baseline profile) and AAC-LC audio. If you want to maximize the screen area of a wide-screen TV, your source file should have an aspect ratio of 16:9 (e.g., 640x360). If you want to maximize the screen area on the iPod, your source file should have an aspect ratio of 4:3 (e.g., 640x480). Because it uses H.264 Main Profile, QuickTime Pro's Movie to Apple TV converter will result in a video that will not sync with the iPod. Refer to the specifications below if you are not using the built-in converters in Compressor, QuickTime Pro, or iTunes. iPod can play the following video formats: * H.264 video, up to 1.5 Mbps, 640 x 480, 30 frames per sec., Low-Complexity version of the Baseline Profile with AAC-LC audio up to 160 kbps, 48 Khz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats * H.264 video, up to 768 kbps, 320 x 240, 30 frames per sec., Baseline Profile up to Level 1.3 with AAC-LC audio up to 160 kbps, 48 Khz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats * MPEG-4 video, up to 2.5 Mbps, 640 x 480, 30 frames per sec., Simple Profile with AAC-LC audio up to 160 kbps, 48 Khz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats Apple TV can display H.264 video, up to 5mbps, 1280x720, 24 fps, Progressive Main Profile. Apple TV supports AAC-LC audio up to 320 Kbps. The gating factors for video are bit rate and frame rate. The following are some sample conversions generated by the QuickTime Pro when choosing Movie to Apple TV: Input Output 640x480, 30fps 640x480, 30fps, 3mbps* 1280x720 24fps 1280x720, 24p 5mbps* 1280x720, 30fps 960x540, 30fps 4mbps* 1920x1080, 24fps1280x720, 24fps 5mbps* 1920x1080, 30fps960x540, 30fps 4mbps* 1080i up to 60fps 960x540, 30fps 4mbps* * Represents an average bit rate. = -Scott
[videoblogging] Re: Apple TV
Here's the current text on encoding for iPod / Apple TV, from a forthcoming version of the podcasting technical spec. Details may change slightly, so check the technical spec page for anything new: http://www.apple.com/itunes/store/podcaststechspecs.html = Formatting Video for the iPod or Apple TV Although iTunes can play a variety of .mp4, .m4v, and .mov video formats, Apple TV and the iPod require more specific formats. The iPod supports up to 640x480, while Apple TV supports up to 1280x720. To optimize for both platforms, we recommend that your source file is at least 640 pixels wide and that you use the built-in iPod converters in Compressor (H.264 for iPod), QuickTime Pro (Movie to iPod) or iTunes (Convert Selection for iPod). Each of these maintains the aspect ration of your source file and results in an M4V file containing H.264 video (Low Complexity version of the Baseline profile) and AAC-LC audio. If you want to maximize the screen area of a wide-screen TV, your source file should have an aspect ratio of 16:9 (e.g., 640x360). If you want to maximize the screen area on the iPod, your source file should have an aspect ratio of 4:3 (e.g., 640x480). Because it uses H.264 Main Profile, QuickTime Pro's Movie to Apple TV converter will result in a video that will not sync with the iPod. Refer to the specifications below if you are not using the built-in converters in Compressor, QuickTime Pro, or iTunes. iPod can play the following video formats: * H.264 video, up to 1.5 Mbps, 640 x 480, 30 frames per sec., Low-Complexity version of the Baseline Profile with AAC-LC audio up to 160 kbps, 48 Khz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats * H.264 video, up to 768 kbps, 320 x 240, 30 frames per sec., Baseline Profile up to Level 1.3 with AAC-LC audio up to 160 kbps, 48 Khz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats * MPEG-4 video, up to 2.5 Mbps, 640 x 480, 30 frames per sec., Simple Profile with AAC-LC audio up to 160 kbps, 48 Khz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats Apple TV can display H.264 video, up to 5mbps, 1280x720, 24 fps, Progressive Main Profile. Apple TV supports AAC-LC audio up to 320 Kbps. The gating factors for video are bit rate and frame rate. The following are some sample conversions generated by the QuickTime Pro when choosing Movie to Apple TV: Input Output 640x480, 30fps 640x480, 30fps, 3mbps* 1280x720 24fps 1280x720, 24p 5mbps* 1280x720, 30fps 960x540, 30fps 4mbps* 1920x1080, 24fps1280x720, 24fps 5mbps* 1920x1080, 30fps960x540, 30fps 4mbps* 1080i up to 60fps 960x540, 30fps 4mbps* * Represents an average bit rate. = -Scott