Hi people,
Just was checking the plugins release and I noticed a couple of things that
could be improved (this
is not specifically about the release, but more technical).
A couple of things were missing from the release, which could be handled a
different way :
- The parent pom of trinidad
van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi people,
Just was checking the plugins release and I noticed a couple of things
that could be improved (this
is not specifically about the release, but more technical).
A couple of things were missing from the release, which could be
handled
There isn't any notice on the name change on the status page. I assume that the
name change is there
to stay ? Would also be nice if someone still has some idea on what date the
name change actually
happened.
Since the rest is still called adffaces (list names, incubator page, etc) I am
not
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
We can also bring this discussion to general to ask for opinions, although I
think the overhead
created with changing the name in every area isn't probably worth it. ()
That sentence should read assuming Oracle still is ok that the name ADF Faces
is used during
We'll leave it as is and I will update the status page, since according to the
status page the name
change is still unresolved.. (i'll look at the incubator report to see when
this exactly happened)
Mvgr,
Martin
Adam Winer wrote:
On 2/3/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
the NOTICE.TXT and LICENSE.TXT
As far as I know, the only thing that might be holding up graduation
is a dry-run through a release, and that doesn't have to wait until
there's a real release ready.
Martin van den Bemt (our mentor) and me are working on that. I am
fighting with a maven profile (see my
In short : according to me they are.. Any feedback and additions appreciated..
On note : I like to
see that at least the plugins get a release before we start a vote on dev (and
I expressed below
that you are targetting to have a release of core before leaving the incubator,
although that
I just stage to my home directory on people..
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
There is no real staging repo!
right
.../people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/m2-staging-repository is nothing
more than a temporary folder that is currently used for preparing the
core 1.1.5 release. So
We can do both, but I will focus on the binary..
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,
I was able to prepare the relase, based on the given feedback. Maven
created already a TAG for that (see [1]).
Should we vote on the tag (meaning source files) or on a binary artifact ?
I think
that distributionManagement points to the correct staging dir)
--Manfred
On 2/13/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so that means doing a release:perform to a staging repo (where
ever that is)
to continue ?
-M
On 2/13/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We can do both
Will look at this Saturday (which it already is, but it is actually bed time I
think).
I am behind on mail since Wednesday :(
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,
I finally managed to get some release artifacts published to a stage
repo. I used my private Apache account for that
Sorry for the delay (board report time)..
- Source jar contains target directory (probably need to do an exclude of that
specifically)
- Source jar src/site don't contain licenses
- Javadoc jar don't contain any notices and license (since javadoc is generated
the html doesn't
need apache
On 2/19/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for the delay (board report time)..
- Source jar contains target directory (probably need to do an exclude
of that specifically)
- Source jar src/site don't contain licenses
- Javadoc jar don't contain any notices and license
includeLICENSE.txt/include
includeINCUBATOR_NOTICE.txt/include
/includes
targetPathMETA-INF/targetPath
/resource
/resources
not applied to the javadoc/sources plugin ?
thx,
M
On 2/19/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for the delay
as the basis of
the vote mail on
general)
Mvgr,
Martin
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
The javadoc things sucks.. We probably can get it work (to add notice, etc),
but at a high cost I
think (at least I couldn't get the simplest solution working, which is adding
files to
src/main/javadoc
I am not volunteering, but it is board report time again...
Mvgr,
Martin
,
Matthias
On 3/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/14/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry people for the late response..
-1.. Missing md5/sha1 checkum for tar.gz and zip (the dist_trin_core).
If they are added and are ok, I am changing to +1
))
To: general@incubator.apache.org
The votes of Trinidad's Core (1.0.0-incubating) release have
been tallied:
+1 Robert Burrell Donkin (Incubator PMC, binding)
+1 Carsten Ziegeler (Incubator PMC, binding)
+1 Martin van den Bemt (Mentor and Incubator PMC, binding)
There were 3 binding Incubator PMC
on the MyFaces PMC, to accept
Trinidad as one of their subprojects. I'll do that vote as well, when
time comes ;-)
-Matthias
Thanks!
Matthias
On 2/10/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In short : according to me they are.. Any feedback and additions
appreciated.. On note : I
Just a disclaimer : this is not an attack on you personally or a statement the
the MyFaces Project
is broken, just like to prevent that it becomes broken :)
Mike Kienenberger wrote:
I'm in favor of MyFaces for Trinidad. I would like to see Trinidad
as the basis for Tomahawk JSF 1.2.
So in
+1 to start graduating :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hello Trinidad PPMC members and Trinidad community,
[X] graduate as a TLP
And a jakarta-style JSF components project.
Let's assume we start the myfaces commons stuff in the near future,
this JSF components TLP could have the following subprojects:
-Tomahawk
-Tobago
-Trinidad
-commons (non-renderkit-goodies)
Martin, you are the man that know best about
The key cannot be renamed..
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
FYI
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1224
-Matthias
decision (or lazy concensus) and any PMC member
can make the request. Matthias is a member of the MyFaces PMC.
If I'm wrong, please stop me before I misinform again! :-)
On 4/28/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have Manfred give his ok to this.. Infrastructure requests need
, and an export.
something like that possible ?
Or, we create a new, empty jira, and I can move all tickets.
-Matthias
On 4/28/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The key cannot be renamed..
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
FYI
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
25 matches
Mail list logo
