On Sep 20, 2011, at 11:05 PM, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
Am 20.09.2011 13:19, schrieb Christian Thalinger:
On Sep 19, 2011, at 11:09 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
[Moving hotspot-runtime-dev to Bcc]
On Sep 17, 2011, at 9:05 PM, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
Hi,
while doing further
I finally filed a CR for this error:
7093796: JSR 292: Rtalk test case fails with: NoClassDefFoundError:
ri/core/rtalk/RtObject
-- Christian
On Aug 27, 2011, at 12:25 AM, Mark Roos wrote:
Thanks Rémi
I tried to put just the offending class on the boot path but that was not
enough.
And I filed a CR for this bug too:
7093795: JSR 292: Seph bench/bench_arithmetic.sp fails with:
NoClassDefFoundError: seph/lang/SephObject
-- Christian
On Jul 4, 2011, at 7:23 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Jun 25, 2011, at 4:16 PM, Ola Bini wrote:
Please try out the patch. I've also
CR:http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7085860
Webrev:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~twisti/7085860/
Review:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/2011-September/006287.html
Changeset:
On Sep 21, 2011, at 8:21 AM, Mark Roos wrote:
From Remi
Moreover, are you sure the code that contains these callsites is JITed,
No, but then how would I know and what would I do if I did know. If its
JITed
and I do the 10th ( or whatever) invalidate in three months because of
Looks good. -- Christian
On Sep 20, 2011, at 12:09 AM, John Rose wrote:
7077803: java.lang.InternalError in java.lang.invoke.MethodHandleNatives.init
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jrose/7077803/webrev.00
Remove access checking and access narrowing logic from
MethodHandles.unreflectX calls,
On Sep 19, 2011, at 11:58 PM, John Rose wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jrose/7030453/webrev.00
src/share/classes/java/lang/ClassValue.java:
233 /** Value stream for for hashCodeForCache. See similar structure in
ThreadLocal. */
Two for's.
578 * from the ehad of a non-null
and the Dissabled TestNew2.txt
should bei in the temp dir after running build.xml.
(
Christian Thalingerchristian.thalin...@oracle.com schrieb:
On Sep 19, 2011, at 11:09 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
[Moving hotspot-runtime-dev to Bcc]
On Sep 17, 2011, at 9:05 PM, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
Hi
On Sep 19, 2011, at 11:09 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
[Moving hotspot-runtime-dev to Bcc]
On Sep 17, 2011, at 9:05 PM, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
Hi,
while doing further investigations on my idea [0] i observed a
reproducable crash of the vm.
It seems to me that it happens while
On Sep 19, 2011, at 11:58 PM, John Rose wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jrose/7030453/webrev.00
src/share/classes/java/lang/ClassValue.java:
233 /** Value stream for for hashCodeForCache. See similar structure in
ThreadLocal. */
Two for's.
578 * from the ehad of a non-null
On Sep 18, 2011, at 7:16 PM, Mark Roos wrote:
In looking at my code.
In general 98% of the callsites are 3 targets.
Those that are larger I can catch and use a different lookup. I also believe
that Charles Nutter limits his
depth to 5.
So the general case I see will not exceed
[Moving hotspot-runtime-dev to Bcc]
On Sep 17, 2011, at 9:05 PM, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
Hi,
while doing further investigations on my idea [0] i observed a
reproducable crash of the vm.
It seems to me that it happens while the hotspot tries to inline (i
think) a invokedynamic call.
On Sep 19, 2011, at 11:09 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
[Moving hotspot-runtime-dev to Bcc]
On Sep 17, 2011, at 9:05 PM, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
Hi,
while doing further investigations on my idea [0] i observed a
reproducable crash of the vm.
It seems to me that it happens while
On Sep 7, 2011, at 11:15 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
On 09/07/2011 09:08 AM, John Rose wrote:
On Sep 7, 2011, at 12:00 AM, Per Bothner wrote:
I assume this is one reason why Kawa's IntNum is (mostly) faster than
BigInteger.
Yes, that's probably true.
Here's a dirty secret: As you can
On Sep 6, 2011, at 5:51 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Rémi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
Yes, but don't forget that PHP.reboot has no overflow check.
Did we ever figure out if it's possible to trick Hotspot into doing a
JO instead of the raw bit-level
On Sep 5, 2011, at 1:11 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
I've just compiled the hotspot (64bits server) using the hotspot-comp
workspace of hotspot express (hsx)
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hotspot-comp/hotspot/
Here are the result when running PHP.reboot on fibonacci
(-server is the server VM
Tom was looking into a bug with his bimorphic inlining patch and said something
about massive inlining with RtalkTest so I thought I also give it a shot.
One thing I can say for sure: massive inlining and huge methods!
We get a lot like:
@ 115 java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle::asSpreader (13
No. That script just builds HotSpot as is in the hotspot-comp repository (no
patches applied).
-- Christian
On Aug 28, 2011, at 12:44 AM, Mark Roos wrote:
Charles
Does this script get all of the latest mlvm patches or is there another step
to pull those?
What about the conditional
I can confirm the NCDFE. This could be a duplicate of:
7055941: JSR 292 method handle invocation causes excessive deoptimization for
types not on boot class path
The workaround is to put the runtime on the boot class path.
I also can confirm that the second run of Hanoi is slower with JDK 7.
On Aug 16, 2011, at 12:19 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Tom Rodriguez tom.rodrig...@oracle.com
wrote:
On Aug 12, 2011, at 4:15 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Well, let me play devil's advocate here: why not just discount MH
chains completely?
It
On Aug 24, 2011, at 3:15 AM, Mark Roos wrote:
In looking for my classDefNotFound bug I tried the latest build I could find
for bsd port.
The 0609 version worked at least past this point but the 0808 version gave a
fatal error
# fatal error: memory leak: allocating without
On Aug 24, 2011, at 6:07 AM, Stephen Bannasch wrote:
After I build mlvm I run the running jdk/test/java/lang/invoke tests as well
as jdk/test/java/dyn/CoroutineTest.java
I'm getting fatal errors in Java running:
java/lang/invoke/ThrowExceptionsTest.java
jtreg jtr and hs_err_pid log
On Aug 24, 2011, at 8:44 PM, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
I made one:
import java.lang.invoke.*;
import static java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles.*;
import static java.lang.invoke.MethodType.*;
public class RM implements Runnable {
public static void main(String... args) throws Throwable {
That's pretty much it. If you have more that two cores increase the number for
HOTSPOT_BUILD_JOBS (it's like make -j [jobs]).
-- Christian
On Aug 19, 2011, at 9:12 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
I've posted a gist with a script and instructions for setting up a
trunk build environment for
On Aug 17, 2011, at 2:01 PM, Jim Laskey wrote:
# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
# Internal Error
(/Users/stephen/dev/java/src/mlvm/sources/hotspot/src/share/vm/runtime/frame.cpp:1158),
pid=1021, tid=4410376192
# Error: ShouldNotReachHere()
Do you
the
first time as the bytecodes are quickened right after that. And in the case
where a putfield isn't quickened and we call resolve_get_put it gets very
expensive anyway.
On 8/8/11 6:56 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
Why on sparc you use ld_ptr() to load from cache but on X86 and X64 you use
On Aug 16, 2011, at 4:12 PM, Jeroen Frijters wrote:
Hi Rémi,
Do you have changed the argument of fib, the result is different from
one post by Charles ?
I didn't change anything and I get the same result with JDK 7, so something
else must have changed.
We usually use 5 35 as arguments
On Aug 10, 2011, at 9:10 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Jul 28, 2011, at 7:29 PM, Ola Bini wrote:
On 2011-07-28 10.11, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Jul 28, 2011, at 6:10 PM, Ola Bini wrote:
The bad performance sounds like something is not inlined at all.
How are you invoking
On Aug 8, 2011, at 8:21 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Aug 8, 2011, at 6:39 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Christian Thalinger
christian.thalin...@oracle.com wrote:
Since I have the basic push-notification of CallSites I'm now looking into
push
On Jul 28, 2011, at 7:29 PM, Ola Bini wrote:
On 2011-07-28 10.11, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Jul 28, 2011, at 6:10 PM, Ola Bini wrote:
The bad performance sounds like something is not inlined at all.
How are you invoking valueMH? Via invokedynamic or a direct MH
call?
valueMH
On Aug 9, 2011, at 7:58 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
I have set up a local build against hsx hotspot compiler dev branch,
thanks to Christian. I'll try to write something up with the process
tomorrow.
Anyway, I wanted to test out Tom's patch for GWT bimorphic inlining
and Christian's
, at 6:32 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~twisti/7071653
7071653: JSR 292: call site change notification should be pushed not pulled
Reviewed-by:
Currently every speculatively inlined method handle call site has a
guard that compares the current target
Since I have the basic push-notification of CallSites I'm now looking into
push-notification of SwitchPoints:
7071709: JSR 292: switchpoint invalidation should be pushed not pulled
Basically it should be the same, just needs some additional love in the
compiler.
I looked into JRuby's usage of
, Christian Thalinger wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~twisti/7071653
7071653: JSR 292: call site change notification should be pushed not pulled
Reviewed-by:
Currently every speculatively inlined method handle call site has a
guard that compares the current target of the CallSite object
On Aug 8, 2011, at 4:01 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
On 08/08/2011 03:51 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
Since I have the basic push-notification of CallSites I'm now looking into
push-notification of SwitchPoints:
7071709: JSR 292: switchpoint invalidation should be pushed not pulled
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~twisti/7071653
7071653: JSR 292: call site change notification should be pushed not pulled
Reviewed-by:
Currently every speculatively inlined method handle call site has a
guard that compares the current target of the CallSite object to the
inlined one. This
On Jul 28, 2011, at 2:20 AM, Ola Bini wrote:
Hi,
I've hit a very annoying performance problem with invoke dynamic/method
handles that makes certain benchmarks about 3 times slower for identical
operations. This code is related to to variable lookup and the basic
idea is that I have a
On Jul 10, 2011, at 8:42 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
I'm attaching an error log for a crash that's reproducible for me with
a recent openjdk-osx-build. It may or may not be useful depending on
how far behind other fixes they are.
I thought it would be interesting for MLVM list because
On Jul 9, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Hiroshi Nakamura wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for you comments.
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 19:01, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote:
Code is here:
https://raw.github.com/nahi/jsr292-sandbox/master/src/jp/gr/java_conf/jruby/MethodHandleTest.java
lookup I don't
On Jun 21, 2011, at 3:28 AM, John Rose wrote:
On Jun 20, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
On Jun 18, 2011, at 5:15 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
On 06/18/2011 03:15 AM, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
On Jun 17, 2011, at 5:00 PM, John Rose wrote:
On Jun 17, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
On Jul 6, 2011, at 10:49 PM, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
On Jul 6, 2011, at 4:18 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Jul 5, 2011, at 6:39 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
I'm not in position at this exact moment to report perf issues, but
Rémi's list would be a good start. I'll return to JRuby
On Jul 7, 2011, at 8:52 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Jul 6, 2011, at 10:49 PM, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
On Jul 6, 2011, at 4:18 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Jul 5, 2011, at 6:39 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
I'm not in position at this exact moment to report perf issues
On Jul 5, 2011, at 4:16 AM, Mark Roos wrote:
Ok here is is, a test case for our port of Smalltalk to the JVM using 292.
Let me know if you can run it as this is our first outside attempt.
Its a simple test, towers of Hanoi done in a recursive manner. This version
only uses
20 disks
On Jul 1, 2011, at 6:01 AM, John Rose wrote:
Do you have a website or blog you can post it on?
Is it available somewhere yet? -- Christian
On Jun 30, 2011, at 8:47 PM, Mark Roos wrote:
John requested
Yes, please. We especially love stress tests.
Oscar is putting it together. Where
On Jun 25, 2011, at 4:16 PM, Ola Bini wrote:
Please try out the patch. I've also updated the mlvm patches to the
latest bsd-port which (quite awesomely) is b146.
It runs fine for me.
Hmm, this is odd. I'm just trying b147 and I still get the same problem when
putting seph.jar on the
On Jun 21, 2011, at 11:35 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
Ok, fixed,
convertArguments doesn't exist anymore and I forget to remove it from
the backport.
Awesome, thanks. This one looks weird though:
$ bin/phpr.sh test/testdeadreturn.phpr
null
com.googlecode.phpreboot.runtime.RT$RTError: null at 7,18
On Jun 21, 2011, at 11:35 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
Ok, fixed,
convertArguments doesn't exist anymore and I forget to remove it from
the backport.
I currently trying to push some PHP code into your web server :-) Is it
possible to recognize .php files too (not only .phpr files)?
-- Christian
On Jun 21, 2011, at 12:20 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Jun 21, 2011, at 11:35 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
Ok, fixed,
convertArguments doesn't exist anymore and I forget to remove it from
the backport.
I currently trying to push some PHP code into your web server :-) Is it
possible
On Jun 21, 2011, at 1:02 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
On 06/21/2011 12:29 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Jun 21, 2011, at 12:20 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Jun 21, 2011, at 11:35 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
Ok, fixed,
convertArguments doesn't exist anymore and I forget to remove it from
On Jun 15, 2011, at 5:26 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
// with the optimization
[forax@localhost binary-operation]$ time java -cp .:classes PerfOpt
real0m0.954s
user0m1.030s
sys0m0.087s
// without
[forax@localhost binary-operation]$ time java -cp .:classes Perf
real0m0.378s
user
On Jun 15, 2011, at 5:26 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
I've just finished to code a sample for the cookbook that does
integer operation (+ and -) with overflow (to BigInteger).
https://code.google.com/p/jsr292-cookbook/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fbinary-operation%2Fsrc%2Fjsr292%2Fcookbook%2Fbinop
On Jun 15, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Jun 15, 2011, at 5:26 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
I've just finished to code a sample for the cookbook that does
integer operation (+ and -) with overflow (to BigInteger).
https://code.google.com/p/jsr292-cookbook/source/browse/#svn
version 1.7.0-ea
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0-ea-b145)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build
21.0-b14-internal-201106142151.never.7052219, mixed mode)
Transform time : 101
Can you confirm that?
-- Christian
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:38 AM, Christian Thalinger
christian.thalin
On May 27, 2011, at 12:35 AM, Ola Bini wrote:
On 2011-05-27 12.58, John Rose wrote:
On May 27, 2011, at 12:24 AM, Ola Bini wrote:
But then it crashes at the same place.
Excellent!
So this works in b144 but not in mlvm?
Yes, that's correct.
Is there any other crash you're still
On Jun 4, 2011, at 5:19 AM, Ola Bini wrote:
On 2011-06-04 01.47, John Rose wrote:
On Jun 3, 2011, at 7:07 AM, Ola Bini wrote:
Is there anything I can do to help out with finding this problem?
I can't reproduce the VM crash yet. Like Christian, I got through
problems 1 and 2, on bsd (both
On Jun 5, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
OH, and FWIW, here's the LogCompilation -i output roughly around where
I'd expect to see op_plus and op_lt inlining:
@ 27 java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle::invokeExact (0 bytes)
@ 27 java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle::invokeExact (17
On Jun 5, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
OH, and FWIW, here's the LogCompilation -i output roughly around where
I'd expect to see op_plus and op_lt inlining:
@ 27 java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle::invokeExact (0 bytes)
@ 27 java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle::invokeExact (17
On Jun 10, 2011, at 3:37 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Christian Thalinger
christian.thalin...@oracle.com wrote:
It inlines fine with the latest HotSpot and JDK7 b145. I think we're good
:-)
Sorry, the logic for this never actually landed on JRuby
On Jun 8, 2011, at 11:10 PM, Attila Szegedi wrote:
Woo-hoo!
I agree :-)
On Jun 8, 2011, at 9:48 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Hello friends! I have another update!
I've just landed preliminary work to make JRuby directly bind Ruby to
Java calls that were normally done via
On Jun 7, 2011, at 10:44 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
That's pretty much it. The test I ran looks like this:
def foo
1
end
100_000.times {
foo
}
The body of the block passed to times jits (in Hotspot) and appears
to inline the foo method just fine, but the body of the inlined
On May 26, 2011, at 10:42 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On May 26, 2011, at 9:15 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Tom Rodriguez tom.rodrig...@oracle.com
wrote:
but test is some ugly goo because of boxing. It's relatively easy to get
the optimizer to fold
On May 26, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
Am 26.05.2011 11:03, schrieb Christian Thalinger:
[...]
I looked at the inlining tree of fib and everything looks good and is
inlined. There is one invokeExact which is:
@ 43 java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle::invokeExact (42 bytes) too
On May 25, 2011, at 5:58 AM, Ola Bini wrote:
Hi,
There are at least three problems that are still there. They might be
connected, or not.
(I will tell you how to reproduce these at the end)
I just built a new JVM:
openjdk version 1.7.0-internal
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build
someone provide a jar file of the current MLVM JSR 292 classes
(like John's meth.jar)?
-- Christian
Cheers
On 2011-05-25 14.29, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On May 25, 2011, at 5:58 AM, Ola Bini wrote:
Hi,
There are at least three problems that are still there. They might be
connected
On May 21, 2011, at 1:31 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
I am still using the specialized math callsites because they inline well and
an Indy-based approach was still quite a bit slower last time I tried.
I am back to being worried about the inlining thresholds. With no MHs and
runtime
On May 23, 2011, at 8:45 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Christian Thalinger
christian.thalin...@oracle.com wrote:
I was on vacation for a couple of days but now I'm back.
I looked at the inlining tree for fib_recursive and I can't see the fib_ruby
method
On May 14, 2011, at 6:49 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
FYI, I assume I'm supposed to see this when I bind an interface method
acquired from findVirtual to an indy call site:
#
# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
# Internal Error
On May 12, 2011, at 3:51 PM, Stephen Bannasch wrote:
I'm getting some failures running the jtreg tests and wondered whether I
needed to enable or disable Ricochet Frames in theJVM
but that option is unrecognized.
$ build/bsd-amd64/j2sdk-image/bin/java -XX:-UseRicochetFrame
On May 11, 2011, at 6:08 PM, John Rose wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jrose/6939861/webrev.jdk.06/
src/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/AdapterMethodHandle.java:
+if (false spreadArgCount SPREAD_LIMIT)
+return false;
+if (false slotCount +
Changeset: 961bae798841
Author:twisti
Date: 2011-05-11 02:18 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/jdk/rev/961bae798841
Test6998541 updated
! meth.patch
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
On May 10, 2011, at 3:25 AM, Douglas Campos (qmx) wrote:
Hi folks
Charles Nutter mentioned that some people were working/playing with making
Rhino faster. Does anyone have pointers on what were done / has to be done?
John knows more about this but there is his blog entry about JavaOne 2010:
On May 9, 2011, at 3:34 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
FYI, this produced a SIGSEGV:
jruby --server bench/shootout/binarytrees.ruby-2.ruby 15
14 and lower worked ok. Crash is consistent. Running macosx build from
4/28...not sure what build of mainline it maps to...
This one?
stretch
On May 9, 2011, at 3:34 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
FYI, this produced a SIGSEGV:
jruby --server bench/shootout/binarytrees.ruby-2.ruby 15
Is invokedynamic now used by default? -- Christian
14 and lower worked ok. Crash is consistent. Running macosx build from
4/28...not sure what
On May 9, 2011, at 4:27 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On May 9, 2011, at 3:34 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
FYI, this produced a SIGSEGV:
jruby --server bench/shootout/binarytrees.ruby-2.ruby 15
14 and lower worked ok. Crash is consistent. Running macosx build from
4/28...not sure
On May 5, 2011, at 1:16 PM, John Rose wrote:
I have finished the last large chunk of JVM work for JDK 7 JSR 292, the
implementation of so-called ricochet frames. Here it is for review:
6939861: JVM should handle more conversion operations
On May 6, 2011, at 9:27 AM, John Rose wrote:
All new header files have the wrong (Sun) copyright header.
I'm backing off from introducing new header files. The only new file is
methodHandles_x86.hpp.
See what you think. The idea is to allow each port to control its own
individual
On Apr 30, 2011, at 9:27 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
I have pushed a change to JRuby master that fails over to a simple
inline cache after one failed GWT. This is not how I would want to do
it long-term, but it does bring some benchmarks back in line with
non-indy JRuby. Specifically,
On May 4, 2011, at 3:08 PM, John Rose wrote:
On May 4, 2011, at 5:50 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
I don't know how you get over this:
src/share/vm/prims/methodHandles.hpp:487: error: conflicting declaration
‘OopClosure* f’
src/share/vm/prims/methodHandles.hpp:487: error: ‘f’ has
On May 3, 2011, at 5:06 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
On 05/03/2011 03:59 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On May 2, 2011, at 9:55 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Rémi Foraxfo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
Do you specialize the overflow check depending on the callsite
On May 1, 2011, at 7:39 AM, Mark Roos wrote:
Now that the core works I thought I would take a quick look at the execution
speed. For this I
executed the same code in our current environment (OS/2 and a mid 90's
Smalltalk) and again using
our invokeDynamic based vm translation. The code
On Apr 29, 2011, at 3:44 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
On 04/29/2011 01:09 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Apr 28, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Christian Thalinger
christian.thalin...@oracle.com wrote:
I took a look at it. I used 64-bit x86 since
On Apr 28, 2011, at 9:58 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
I'm trying to figure out why polymorphic dispatch is incredibly slow
in JRuby + indy. Take this benchmark, for example:
class A; def foo; end; end
class B; def foo; end; end
a = A.new
b = B.new
5.times { puts Benchmark.measure
[Bcc'ing jdk7-dev.]
On Mar 23, 2011, at 4:10 PM, Stefanie Tellex wrote:
Hi,
Not sure if this is the right place to report this,
The right list would be: hotspot-...@openjdk.java.net
but I have a Java program that reliably seg faults the JVM when run under
GDB. It doesn't seem to
On Apr 1, 2011, at 4:33 PM, Gary Benson wrote:
Hi all,
This webrev adds support for JSR 292 to Zero:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gbenson/zero-jsr292-01/
hotspot/src/cpu/zero/vm/cppInterpreter_zero.cpp:
+// NB the x86 code for this (in methodHandles_x86.cpp, search for
+//
On Apr 5, 2011, at 2:49 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
Does this code pass the jtreg tests in jdk/test/java/lang/invoke/ ?
It passed their previous incarnation in jdk/test/java/dyn, with
this webrev applied to stop the tests disabling themselves:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gbenson/zero
On Apr 12, 2011, at 2:56 PM, Ola Bini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Since there are not many projects out there that already use JSR 292
(JRuby and phpreboot are the only real users that I know of, but maybe I
missed something), the code path coverage is low and
On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:00 PM, Mark Roos wrote:
I know you are all working hard to bring 292 to a release so I thought I
would take a moment
to thank you all for your work and to tell you how much that work helped with
our Smalltalk
porting.
We have about 500K lines of Smalltalk code
On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:16 PM, Gary Benson wrote:
Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Apr 5, 2011, at 3:46 PM, Gary Benson wrote:
Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Apr 4, 2011, at 10:34 AM, Gary Benson wrote:
John Rose wrote:
On Apr 1, 2011, at 7:33 AM, Gary Benson wrote:
This webrev adds support
On Apr 5, 2011, at 4:32 PM, Gary Benson wrote:
Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Apr 5, 2011, at 4:04 PM, Gary Benson wrote:
Christian Thalinger wrote:
hotspot/src/share/vm/interpreter/bytecodeInterpreter.cpp:
+ assert(false, Should have thrown incompatible class change
exception
On Apr 1, 2011, at 7:21 PM, Arthur Peters wrote:
Hello there, I've been lurking for a while and watching all the work going on.
Especially now that things are starting to stabilize I'd be really interested
to play with it. What are the best versions for a casual watcher to play
with? I'm
On Mar 28, 2011, at 10:20 PM, shanka@gmail.com wrote:
The complete log is pasted here:
http://pylonshq.com/pasties/b8c342db8d9a342d058584a958d434a4
The point where it crashes: (at the function _qformat) is where the JVM
should actually invoke via invokedynamic.
I have tested this
- Charlie
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Christian Thalinger
christian.thalin...@oracle.com wrote:
On Mar 24, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
I reran JRuby tests today and noticed a couple of problems. One I'd like
an opinion on is test/test_crazy_blocks. It fails
On Mar 24, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
I reran JRuby tests today and noticed a couple of problems. One I'd like an
opinion on is test/test_crazy_blocks. It fails with invokedynamic and I'm
not sure if either JRuby or the JDK has a bug.
Charlie, do you have an idea
On Mar 28, 2011, at 7:15 PM, shanka@gmail.com wrote:
The complete hs_err log file is pasted here:
http://pylonshq.com/pasties/4ce99d93fbe70ee1347df7fc100934d2
What else should I try?
-XX:+UseSerialGC. It seems my previous email didn't make it to the list.
--
On Mar 24, 2011, at 6:30 AM, John Rose wrote:
Thanks for the review, Christian. Here's a little bit more...
Here's an updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jrose/7012648/webrev.jdk.01/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jrose/7012648/webrev.jdk.01.nontriv/
The nontriv version is
I reran JRuby tests today and noticed a couple of problems. One I'd like an
opinion on is test/test_crazy_blocks. It fails with invokedynamic and I'm not
sure if either JRuby or the JDK has a bug.
Charlie, do you have an idea?
-- Christian
$ bin/jruby.sh -Xcompile.invokedynamic=false
, Christian Thalinger
christian.thalin...@oracle.com wrote:
On Mar 14, 2011, at 2:28 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Mar 7, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Howard Lovatt wrote:
Hi,
I got the following when trying to use CallSites on Stephen Bannasch's
latest build (which isn't the latest latest build
On Mar 18, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Howard Lovatt wrote:
Yes, it is a file I am using to learn/experiment with lambdas.
I don't have a lambda capable javac at hand so let's wait if this problem
solves itself :-)
-- Christian
On 18 March 2011 20:31, Christian Thalinger
christian.thalin
On Mar 14, 2011, at 2:28 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Mar 7, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Howard Lovatt wrote:
Hi,
I got the following when trying to use CallSites on Stephen Bannasch's
latest build (which isn't the latest latest build and therefore this
issue might have been found already
On Mar 7, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Howard Lovatt wrote:
Hi,
I got the following when trying to use CallSites on Stephen Bannasch's
latest build (which isn't the latest latest build and therefore this
issue might have been found already):
# To suppress the following error report, specify this
401 - 500 of 1313 matches
Mail list logo
