Fedora 39 beta freeze now over

With the release of Fedora 39 Beta yesterday, infrastructure freeze is now over. Our next freeze is for Fedora 39 final release, currently scheduled for 2023-10-03. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list --

Re: Intention to tighten RPM crypto-policy back

On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 11:19:18AM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > Hello, > > 6 months ago, there's been a F38 blocker: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2960 > Long story short: > RPM has moved to sequoia, > sequoia has started respecting crypto-policies, > Google repos have been signed with a

Re: Fedora Linux 39 Beta Released

On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 09:57:35AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19 2023 at 04:01:59 PM +0200, Tomas Hrcka > wrote: > > Download the prerelease from our Get Fedora site: > > * Get Fedora Linux 39 Beta Workstation: > > https://getfedora.org/workstation/download/ > > * Get Fedora

Re: signature issue with recent dnf update (fc38)

On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 10:08:25AM +1000, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: > On 15/09/2023 06.37, Kevin Fenzi wrote: ...snip... > > Are you running a fc6 system? Or where do you have this rpm? > > I am not running fc6, I run fc38. ok. > > I'd strongly advise you to... not use a fc6

Re: The new Change discussion process is painful

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:44:22AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > If I was subscribed to some categories without doing anything, e.g. "Package > Reviews Swaps" (why I cannot copy the string from UI , this is precisely > the annoyance with web applications), why I have not been subscribed to >

Re: signature issue with recent dnf update (fc38)

On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 12:29:56AM +1000, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: > The below message shows, then the update proceeds to completion. > Is it a problem? Is there something I should do or is it something at the > repository side (which one?). > > I found articles suggested rebuilding the rpm db.

Re: AWS Instances without tag FedoraGroup=*

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 01:35:58PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > I have cleanup a lot. I notified Testing farm, they will tag their resource > soon. > > BTW if you are in CC, then you likely own one of the resources in AWS. > Please add tag FedoraGroup=* to it. Otherwise it may be deleted. > >

Re: AWS - strange error: volume in use, but is not attached

On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 09:22:27AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > When cleaning the old volumes I find strange error > > This volume: > > https://ap-southeast-1.console.aws.amazon.com/ec2/home?region=ap-southeast-1#VolumeDetails:volumeId=vol-495d4a40 > > i.e. vol-495d4a40 in ap-southeast-1 > >

Re: AWS gp2 -> gp3

On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 11:17:41AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 05. 09. 23 v 17:11 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > > So, I think it would be ok to just do anytime, but you can wait until > > after freeze if you want to be extra careful. > > > Freeze is over. I migrated a

Re: FAS 2FA recovery keys?

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 10:58:24AM +0100, Barry Scott wrote: > > > > On 12 Sep 2023, at 10:32, Michael J Gruber wrote: > > > > Am Di., 12. Sept. 2023 um 11:22 Uhr schrieb Barry Scott > > : > >> > >> I have been updating my FAS account security. > >> When I setup 2FA I was not offer any

Re: PDC replacement proposal

at 12:23 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 11:35:19AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 04:51:22PM +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote: > > > > Hello all, it took us a few years but we are finally getting rid of >

Re: PDC replacement proposal

at 12:23 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 11:35:19AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 04:51:22PM +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote: > > > > Hello all, it took us a few years but we are finally getting rid of >

Re: An update on RHEL moving to issues.redhat.com

On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 11:43:55AM -0400, Solomon Peachy via devel wrote: > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 07:58:03AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > No? All of our packages are on https://src.fedoraproject.org/ and our > > Fedora-specific source code goes on https://pagure.io/. These are both > >

Re: AWS Instances without tag FedoraGroup=*

On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 02:40:18PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 11. 09. 23 v 6:45 Fabian Arrotin napsal(a): > > AFAIK the ec2 instances in the .centos.org domain are all tagged though, > > so do you have a list of ec2 instances/volumes that are really from > > centos and not tagged properly

Re: AWS Instances without tag FedoraGroup=*

On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 01:45:02AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 07. 09. 23 v 20:49 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > > Nice! I think dkirwan should know about Discourse-test and mobrien > > should know about mobrien-test, and I think the rest are centos ones? > > Due d

Freeze Break Request: update fedora-repos-zchunk on composers

The new fedora-repo-zdicts-2309.1-1.fc38 update has f39 zchunk dictionaries, which should make the zchunk deltas better for f39. I'd like to update compose-branched01/compose-rawhide01/compose-x86_01 so we can get this advantage. I think this is a pretty low impact change and we can always just

Re: Migration from registry.fp.o to quay.io

On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 11:07:15AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 10:15 AM Michal Konecny wrote: > > > > So I contacted William Dettelback from quay.io Team about the feedback I > > got here. > > > > This is the e-mail I sent: > > ``` > > 1) Mock switched to

Re: AWS Instances without tag FedoraGroup=*

On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 11:28:18AM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > JFYI, I just updated the script Mirek had, and created a simple cron job > on one of our staging VMs that collects some AWS instance statistics. > Result is hosted here: > >

Re: Failing Unicode check in perl-Prima

On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 04:15:48PM -, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > > My questions: > > > > Do you agree it's a false positve? > > Can you sanction ammending Fedora rpminspct policy with: > > > > unicode: > > ignore: > > # 0x202D character used on purpose to

Re: Freeze Break request: update *.apps.ocp.fedoraproject.org cert

On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 06:56:36AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > On Wed, 6 Sept 2023 at 06:51, Sandro wrote: > > > On 05-09-2023 21:53, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > I already have the cert ready to push into ansible-private, just need > > > +1's to run the proxie

Re: AWS Instances without tag FedoraGroup=*

Took a look and fixed a number of fedora ones: > Region: ca-central-1 > Instances: > Volumes - [id (attached to instance)]: > * vol-067b5f163d2320171 (cloud-fedora-34-aws-ssd) > * vol-07a41964b391cbe75 (cloud-fedora-34-aws-ssd) > * vol-05fa6f0557ab1e44b (cloud-fedora-34-aws-ssd) > *

Re: PDC replacement proposal

On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 04:51:22PM +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote: > Hello all, it took us a few years but we are finally getting rid of the PDC > project. Thanks to the ARC research we identified use cases in our tooling > and proposed solution. > > The essential functionalities currently provided by

Re: PDC replacement proposal

On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 04:51:22PM +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote: > Hello all, it took us a few years but we are finally getting rid of the PDC > project. Thanks to the ARC research we identified use cases in our tooling > and proposed solution. > > The essential functionalities currently provided by

Re: Migration from registry.fp.o to quay.io

On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 01:57:34PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 12:47 PM Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > > On pondělí 4. září 2023 15:35:41 CEST Michal Konecny wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I finished investigation for migration from registry.fp.o to quay.io. It > > > is

Re: freeze exceptions for FTI bugs

On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 08:21:18AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > updates-testing is not enabled by default for the upgrade. > > The upgrade process uses whatever repos are enabled *in the current > configuration*. So in the "typical" case, you are upgrading from a > stable Fedora release

Re: Cleaning infra groups on Pagure and GitHub

On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:59:12PM +0200, Michal Konecny wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I did a cleaning in Fedora infra groups in both Github (fedora-infra > organization https://github.com/fedora-infra) and Pagure (fedora-infra group > https://pagure.io/group/fedora-infra). I removed the people that

Re: AWS Instances without tag FedoraGroup=*

On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 08:30:26AM +0200, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 03/09/2023 20:59, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > According our SOP > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/infra/sysadmin_guide/aws-access/#_role_and_user_policies > > > >   Users MUST tag resources with their FedoraGroup tag

Re: AWS gp2 -> gp3

On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 09:33:49PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > FYI > > after I moved manually most of the big volumes to gp3 at the beginning of > summer, I finally get to write script that converts all the remaining > volumes. > > I run it for two minor regions: > > ap-south-1 > Migrating

Re: rawhide buildroot seems weird state, Child return code was: 255

On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 05:00:37PM +0200, Sandro wrote: > On 02-09-2023 14:07, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > > Then: > > > > DEBUG util.py:444:  Running transaction check > > DEBUG util.py:444:  Transaction check succeeded. > > DEBUG util.py:444:  Running transaction test > > DEBUG util.py:444: 

Re: firefox builds seem stuck on the farm - pls check

On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 09:56:53AM +0200, Marius Schwarz wrote: > Hi all, > > Am 30.08.23 um 20:54 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: > > > > Perhaps some folks could try building on an x86_64 vm and see if it > > happens outside of koji? > > > > The updates are not

Re: Inactive packager policy for the F39 cycle

On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 06:45:25AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Il 30/08/23 22:02, Ben Cotton ha scritto: > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 2:47 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> Might you be willing to also do the provenpackager one? > >> ( https://docs.fe

Re: firefox builds seem stuck on the farm - pls check

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 07:01:18PM +0200, Marius Schwarz wrote: > Am 30.08.23 um 10:59 schrieb Peter Robinson: > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:55 AM Martin Stransky wrote: > > > On 8/30/23 10:51, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > The builds are here: > > > > > > > >

Re: Inactive packager policy for the F39 cycle

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 07:21:57AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Hello folks, > > I've started the "Inactive Packagers Policy" procedure [1] for the F39 > release cycle. Thanks for doing this! Might you be willing to also do the provenpackager one? (

Re: Manual step in upgrade process for a FSWC

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 11:59:18AM +0200, Iker Pedrosa wrote: > Hi, > > I intend to switch pam_userdb's database provider from BerkeleyDB to GDBM > and I'm writing a Fedora System-Wide Change > for Fedora 40. > The upgrade process would

Re: GitLab Grouping and Naming

On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 03:06:36PM -0600, Tim Flink wrote: > > Has there been a conclusion to this? The AI/ML SIG is looking to request a > FAS group to manage access to the sigs/ai-ml project in GitLab but we're not > sure what to request for a name. > > Thanks, > > Tim Somehow I didn't

Re: Fedora 39 beta freeze now in effect

On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 01:05:16AM -, Ryan Bach wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 03:28:26AM -, Ryan Bach wrote: > > > > Yes? Did you have a question here? > > > > I did post here and also in discussion... > > > > kevin > I guess. Will hyperkitty be updated after the freeze is over?

Re: Fedora 39 beta freeze now in effect

On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 03:28:26AM -, Ryan Bach wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > We are now in the infrastructure freeze leading up to the Fedora 39 > > Beta release. This is a pre release freeze. > > > > We do this to ensure that our infrastructure is stable and ready to > > release the Fedora

Re: Heads up: merging SPDX related PRs

On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 11:08:14PM +0200, Sandro wrote: ...snip... > > I see. Could some sysadmin with supercow powers insert a tag globally? Or > would that be treading on a great many toes? We looked at adding some 'standard' tags, but they would need to be added to each package seperately.

Fedora 39 beta freeze now in effect

Greetings. We are now in the infrastructure freeze leading up to the Fedora 39 Beta release. This is a pre release freeze. We do this to ensure that our infrastructure is stable and ready to release the Fedora 39 Beta when it's available. You can see a list of hosts that do not freeze by

Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library

On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 09:00:34PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > This is now done. Thanks for doing this! kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Planned Outage - Sever updates/reboots - 2023-08-16 21:00 UTC

I've started a hackmd doc to track this: https://hackmd.io/DB-c7z5sQqGHx2me9PWsVg kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Planned Outage - Sever updates/reboots - 2023-08-16 21:00 UTC

Planned Outage - Sever updates/reboots - 2023-08-16 21:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2023-08-16 21:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2023-08-16

Planned Outage - Sever updates/reboots - 2023-08-16 21:00 UTC

Planned Outage - Sever updates/reboots - 2023-08-16 21:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2023-08-16 21:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2023-08-16

Planned Outage - Sever updates/reboots - 2023-08-16 21:00 UTC

Planned Outage - Sever updates/reboots - 2023-08-16 21:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2023-08-16 21:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2023-08-16

Re: Disabling rawhide builds during branching - happening in 2hrs

On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 04:24:14PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Peter Robinson: > > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 9:13 AM Luna Jernberg wrote: > >> > >> I think so as there is Branched composes here atleast: > >> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/ > > > > Builds of packages and

Fedora 39 Mass Branching complete

Hi All, Fedora Linux 39 has now been branched, please be sure to do a 'git fetch -v' to pick up the new branch. As an additional reminder, rawhide/39 has been completely isolated from previous releases, which means that anything you do for 39 you also have to do in the rawhide branch and do a

Fedora 39 Mass Branching complete

Hi All, Fedora Linux 39 has now been branched, please be sure to do a 'git fetch -v' to pick up the new branch. As an additional reminder, rawhide/39 has been completely isolated from previous releases, which means that anything you do for 39 you also have to do in the rawhide branch and do a

Re: Mock v5.0 released (and mock-core-configs v39)

On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 09:58:30AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 08:56 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 10:58 +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > Hello maintainers! > > > > > > Let me announce a new release of Mock v5.0 (the chroot build environment >

Re: Mock v5.0 released (and mock-core-configs v39)

On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 09:58:30AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 08:56 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 10:58 +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > Hello maintainers! > > > > > > Let me announce a new release of Mock v5.0 (the chroot build environment >

Re: Mock v5.0 released (and mock-core-configs v39)

On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 09:58:30AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 08:56 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 10:58 +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > Hello maintainers! > > > > > > Let me announce a new release of Mock v5.0 (the chroot build environment >

congrats to another new sysadmin-mainer

I'm happy to announce that We have approved a new member in our sysadmin-main group: adamwill - Adam Williamson This is the core group of trusted folks that high level access to most everything in fedora infrastructure. Adam has been around for a long time and has setup and run Fedora's OpenQA

Matrix / libera.chat IRC Bridge unavailable

The bridge between our Matrix instances and libera.chat IRC is currently unavailable. Work is ongoing to bring it back, but there's no ETA currently. See https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11460 or https://www.fedorastatus.org for more information. kevin signature.asc Description:

Matrix / libera.chat IRC Bridge unavailable

The bridge between our Matrix instances and libera.chat IRC is currently unavailable. Work is ongoing to bring it back, but there's no ETA currently. See https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11460 or https://www.fedorastatus.org for more information. kevin signature.asc Description:

Re: GitLab Grouping and Naming

On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 02:04:22PM +0200, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 04/08/2023 08:49, Ryan Lerch wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 4:41 PM Fabian Arrotin > > wrote: > > > > > > On 04/08/2023 02:25, Ryan Lerch wrote: > > > > I just would get a discussion started with the process of > > > >

Re: GitLab Grouping and Naming

On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 01:43:09PM +0200, Michal Konecny wrote: > How the FAS and Gitlab groups are synced? Do we need to have them named > same? It's via SAML2 and the groups _can_ be named anything, but we should really use a convention. Basically on the gitlab side you tell it: this saml2

Re: Introduction: Seth Maurice-Brant

On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 07:13:13AM +0100, Igor Jagec wrote: > On Sun, 6 Aug 2023, 19:33 Kevin Fenzi, wrote: > > > We just finished our flocktofedora conference, and ran a workshop there > > on onboarding and mentoring. So, you're arriving at a great time to help > > us wi

Re: Introduction: Seth Maurice-Brant

On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 01:29:17PM +, Seth wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm Seth, an A level student in the UK, currently studying Computer Science, > Business Studies and Biology. > > I've been using Linux for a good few years and Fedora has been the > distribution I've stuck with the longest,

Re: Update on DNF05 in Fedora

On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 02:54:13PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > Samantha Bueno writes: > > We've gone ahead and decided not to replace DNF with DNF05 in Fedora > > 39 and, perhaps notably, Fedora 40 as well. > > For those of us who upgraded to DNF05 in rawhide to test it, is there a > quick

Re: Update on DNF05 in Fedora

On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 08:41:42AM -0400, Samantha Bueno wrote: > I want to close on a positive note and commend my team for the incredible > amount of hard work they have poured into this project thus far, as well as > people we've been collaborating with and who have been testing and offering >

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 06:45:41PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > IMHO it is what the policy says, quite explicitly: > > From > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs > > """ > Cca six weeks

Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 01:46:19AM +0200, Sandro wrote: > On 25-07-2023 18:23, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 02:23:00AM +0200, Sandro wrote: > > > On 24-07-2023 20:30, Samyak Jain wrote: > > > > 21426 builds have been tagged into f39, t

Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild

On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 12:47:12PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 12:40:15PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Samyak Jain: > > > > > - GNU Toolchain Update (gcc 13.2, binutils 2.40, glibc 2.38, gdb 13.2) > > > > This change has not yet been voted on by Fesco, so it's

Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild

On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 02:23:00AM +0200, Sandro wrote: > On 24-07-2023 20:30, Samyak Jain wrote: > > 21426 builds have been tagged into f39, there are currently 1017 failed > > builds > > that need to be addressed by the package maintainers. FTBFS bugs will be > > filed shortly. > > Will all

congrats to our new sysadmin-mainer

I'm happy to announce that We have approved a new member in our sysadmin-main group: darknao - Francois Andrieu This is the core group of trusted folks that high level access to most everything in fedora infrastructure. Francois has done of ton of things around Fedora infrastructure. From

Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild

On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:13:44PM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 9:31 PM Samyak Jain wrote: > > > > The mass rebuild was done in a side tag (f39-rebuild) and moved over to > > f39. > > So it's over? Yes. "was done". > > Things still needing rebuilding

Re: Potential changes to systemd RPM macros

On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 06:45:12AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 02:01:37PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:40:08AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > > The problem is that Fedora 39 and RHEL 9.3 are fast approaching and, &g

Re: Restore access to torrent-file-editor package

On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 02:22:48PM -, Ivan Romanov via devel wrote: > Thanks. So how to restore myself to packager group? https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_inactive_packagers/#returning kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Java-devel list?

On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 01:59:47AM +0200, Peter Boy wrote: > Is there something wrong with the Java-Devel list? > > I can send a message to the list and get no reject or error, but is never > shows up, at least it looks like that. > > Or did I miss something? If you are subscribed it should

Re: F39 Change Proposal: LibreOffice 7.6 (Self-Contained)

On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 04:31:01PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibreOffice_7.6 > > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes > process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive > community feedback. This proposal will

Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild started

On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 11:04:19AM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 13:31:57 +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote: > > Oh, that thing again. > > Let me update the template so sed works correctly. > > > > The wiki page also looks out of date (still refers f38): >

Re: Potential changes to systemd RPM macros

On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:40:08AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > Hi, > > this requires a bit of background, so please bear with me :) Thanks for all the background... :) ...snip reasonable stuff... I agree that an upstream systemd solution is what we should strive for. > The problem is

Re: Meeting Agenda Item: (Re-)Introduction Patrick Creech

On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 02:31:57PM -0400, Patrick Creech wrote: > Hi there!  I popped into the meeting last week and said "Hi", but figured I > should also send this out as well. > > IRC: pcreech > > Since my last introduction[0] the primary thing that has changed is that I > moved into doing

Re: fedora-scm-requests email

On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 10:55:15AM +0100, Mark O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 2:24 PM Maxwell G wrote: > > > On Tue Jul 18, 2023 at 13:47 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 4:38 AM Maxwell G wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > It seems the

Re: Should we provide current/previous release links in URLs?

On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 01:58:09PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2023-07-18 at 13:42 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 05:59:50PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > As part of the cobbler project testing, we need to test accessing Fedora > >

Re: Should we provide current/previous release links in URLs?

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 05:59:50PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > As part of the cobbler project testing, we need to test accessing Fedora > releases with various URLs: > > "http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/35/Everything/x86_64/os;, >

Re: fedora-scm-requests email

On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 02:37:54AM +, Maxwell G wrote: > Hi, > > It seems the fedora-scm-requests processor is creating the initial > repository commits with `releng bot ` as the > committer. Does anyone know where this is coming from? Should it be > changed to something @fedoraproject.org?

Re: RFC: Roadmap for DNF5 in Fedora 39 / invoking the Contingency Mechanism

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 01:37:35PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > As I understand how DNF5 team works, they keep updating DNF5 quickly > enough even in Fedora 38 (but the 'dnf -> dnf-3' exists, instead of > 'dnf -> dnf5'). > > I'm a bit lost in the minor numbers; and Mirek is right, not all the

Re: btrfs loses 32-bit application compatibility after a while

On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:46:40PM -, Scott Talbert wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:45 PM Eric Sandeen > wrote: > > > > But that still raises the question - why does it look like this > > started to happen pretty suddenly around June 30? > > The list of updates that were applied to

Re: btrfs loses 32-bit application compatibility after a while

On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 09:28:15AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: ...snip... > > * Today / soon, I will just reinstall all the buildvm-x86 vm's. > Thats pretty trivial to do (thanks ansible). It may cause some builds to > restart as I move things around, but it shouldn't be too much. ok,

Re: btrfs loses 32-bit application compatibility after a while

On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:28:36AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > The 32-bit binary is what suffers the consequences. > > > > The workload that /causes/ the problem can be anything which creates > > lots of files. > > > > I am aware of that, but having something concretely easily > reproducible

Re: batcave01 move to rhel9 - 2023-07-13 21UTC

This is now done and I think everything is working. I am sure I missed some things, so do file tickets/let us know when you see things that are broken. ;) kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list --

Re: RFC: Roadmap for DNF5 in Fedora 39 / invoking the Contingency Mechanism

On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 12:26:27AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 13. 07. 23 v 23:59 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): > > - rawhide mock / koji builds still default to dnf-3 (DNF 4) > > Support for DNF5 landed in Mock > > https://rpm-software-management.github.io/mock/Release-Notes-4.0 > > In the

Re: blocked for tag f39-updates-candidate

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 09:09:55PM -, Jeremy Newton wrote: > I recently requested to unretire rocm-smi, but after it was completed I tried > to rebuild and I get this: > > BuildError: package rocm-smi is blocked for tag f39-updates-candidate > > See:

Re: btrfs loses 32-bit application compatibility after a while

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 02:28:55PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:33 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > Fedora lists are hostile to upstream collaboration via cross-posting, so > > I can only forward this for your information. > > > > This causes problems with the i686

Re: What is this update waiting on?

On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 01:57:16PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 21:45 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-129c8286a0 > > > > This one seems a bit different. There seem to be no tests running. > > The test gating status

batcave01 move to rhel9 - 2023-07-13 21UTC

Hey folks. I keep putting it off, but I need to move it forward, so I am proposing to move batcave01 to rhel9 tomorrow, starting at 21UTC. My plan is roughly: - sync data from batcave01 to batcave02 - at 21UTC take down services on batcave01 - sync data again - take batcave01 down. - rename

Re: I'm enabling topic authorization on the production bus

On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 08:42:31AM +0200, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > So, something broke, I forgot that the bodhi user also publishes to the > org.fedoraproject.{env}.pungi. > I fixed that now but there were quite a few messages rejected during my > night. It may be necessary to restart the

Re: Fedora infra for Secure Boot components - local setup

On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 02:18:04PM -, Kamil Aronowski wrote: > Thanks for the reply, Kevin. It means a lot to me, as I no longer feel alone > with this issue. I'll try the mock configuration later on, so I do not > overcomplicate things right now - once a basic config works for me, I'll then

Re: I'm enabling topic authorization on the production bus

Thanks for driving this forward! kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Re: F40 Change: Privacy-preserving Telemetry for Fedora Workstation (System-Wide)

On Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 01:06:01PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 06/07/2023 18:10, Aoife Moloney wrote: > > but the conversation about each change > > will take place on Fedora Discussion at > >

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230706.n.0 changes

On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 10:41:59PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > > So lots of spins got broken... I may investigate these just for interest > (I am not the maintainer of any spins above), > however from just a quick glance at this, now fixing these spin breakage > seems rather > tough work than

Re: rawhide build errors on i686

On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 01:47:05PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 10:01 AM Paul Howarth wrote: > > > > Whatever this is, it's intermittent and it's still happening. I'm > > getting koschei reports about failed builds with this symptom every > > day, and yesterday I had a

Re: F38 updates stuck in pending

On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 08:06:17PM +1000, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote: > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11508 To circle back, all these should now have gone to testing. If you see any missed, do file a new ticket. Thanks. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Fedora infra for Secure Boot components - local setup

On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 11:29:27AM -, Kamil Aronowski wrote: > Hello people. I need some help from the good folks who maintain the Fedora > servers responsible for building a bootchain securely, i.e. GRUB2 or the > kernel. For instance, the bkernel01.iad2.fedoraproject.org server. Happy to

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Build JDKs once, repack everywhere (System-Wide) - Proposal Addendum

On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 08:14:01PM +0200, Jiri Vanek wrote: > Hi Kevin! > I'm unabel to answer that. First release will be a bit experiemntal > for sure. But final target is sure - to persist the underlying > portables and to enable srpm rebuild as comfortably as possible. Sure. > As far

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Build JDKs once, repack everywhere (System-Wide) - Proposal Addendum

On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 01:23:42PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote: > On 6/29/23 10:42, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 10:14:31AM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote: > > > On 6/29/23 09:52, Jiri Vanek wrote: > > > > Hi Tom! > > > > > > >

Re: Koji f38 i686 buildroot setup fail

On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 05:02:50PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote: > Hello, > > Have a strange f38 i686 buildroot setup failure in koji > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102741271 > > ... > DEBUG util.py:442: Error unpacking rpm package > shadow-utils-2:4.13-6.fc38.i686 > DEBUG

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Build JDKs once, repack everywhere (System-Wide) - Proposal Addendum

On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 10:14:31AM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote: > On 6/29/23 09:52, Jiri Vanek wrote: > > Hi Tom! > > > > Thanx a lot of for input. Although I did my bes with the tagging, it > > will be learning on the go. > > I had adapted > >

Re: Broken link

On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 01:41:48PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I mailed the admin listed for that site... hopefully they can correct > their mirror and/or mirrormanager to fix it up. > > I marked it inactive in the mean time... they can reacitivate it when > it's fixed. J

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Python 3.12 rebuilds to start in a side tag this week

On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 07:37:13PM +, Maxwell G wrote: > > > If your package is failing with ModuleNotFoundError: No module named > > 'imp', this is happening because Python 3.12 removed the long deprecated > > imp module. As a stopgap measure, you can BuildRequire > > python3-zombie-imp

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >