On Sun, 20 Jun 2021 at 18:25, Ron Olson wrote:
>
> Hey all-
>
> I’m trying to run a mock build with EPEL-8 (epel-8-x86_64) and it fails with:
>
>
> [MIRROR] kernel-headers-4.18.0-305.3.1.el8_4.x86_64.rpm: Status code: 403 for
>
On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 01:51, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > The problems with this is that we are taking a fairly fuzzy data set
> > and making it much easier to track individual users in ways seen as
> > problematic by various laws and regulations.
>
> Well, depends on how you store the
On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 12:27, Justin Forbes wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 3:23 PM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 02:57:17PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > > >We'll at least gather information about capabilities of Fedora
> > > >users hardware.
> > >
On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 11:38, Ron Olson wrote:
>
> Apologies in advance if this is laughable naïveté, but would a possible
> solution be to have a different repo for packages compiled against the
> latest-n-greatest architectures, and packagers could choose to include their
> packages in
On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 04:45, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 16.06.2021 22:22, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Well, that's certainly A Position. I don't think it's anything nearly so
> > absolute, though, and depends on what, who, how, why, and a host of other
> > things. And "it can help us
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 12:45, przemek klosowski via devel
wrote:
>
>
> On 6/16/21 12:09 PM, Florian Weimer wrote
> >> I'm missing something---I get identicaloutput on my v3 Core i7-4810MQ
> > Why do you expect different output?
>
> Stephen was showing off his 'oldest' system and I assumed that it
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 09:39, wwp wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
> I read here and there that `pass` is available for CentOS 7 through the
> EPEL repository. In which I cannot find it :-). I see it available for
> C8 but not C7. Was it removed?
>
Packages in EPEL are made available by the volunteer who
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 08:46, Frantisek Zatloukal
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 2:20 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> On Fedora 34 or later, you can use “/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 --help”.
>> If x86-64-v2 shows up as “supported”, there is compatibile:
>>
>> | Subdirectories of
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 08:16, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 04:29, Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 05:34:02PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> > Hey all,
>> >
>> > Earlier this week, I was helping
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 08:19, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Stephen John Smoogen:
>
> > I used this
> >
> https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/631217/how-do-i-check-if-my-cpu-supports-x86-64-v2
> > to see what cpu instructions are at each level
> >
> >
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 04:29, Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 05:34:02PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Earlier this week, I was helping with processing features for openSUSE
> > Leap 15.4[1] and I discovered that they're planning on introducing
> > x86_64-v2
On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 at 17:35, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Earlier this week, I was helping with processing features for openSUSE
> Leap 15.4[1] and I discovered that they're planning on introducing
> x86_64-v2 to openSUSE soon. The reference for this change was that
> RHEL 9 is going to use
On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 at 12:27, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 10:51 AM Tom Hughes wrote:
> >
> > On 08/06/2021 14:51, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > > I was thinking about suggesting a similar PAM module to convert
> > > existing hashes, but I suspect that we'd be coming up
On Fri, 28 May 2021 at 07:49, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> With the sunset of CentOS8 we want to allow builds on top real RHEL in
> Copr. Now that the RH Developer program is known,
> what are the option? Do we already use it somewhere? Or I will be the
> first to use it? :)
>
> I need it accessible
On Tue, 25 May 2021 at 04:04, Björn Persson wrote:
> Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> > > CUPS discovery is designed to run on secure, private LAN, so it is
> > > expected that you have a protection against somebody connecting to your
> > > WIFI.
> >
> > That is (still) a
On Mon, 24 May 2021 at 22:30, Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Solomon Peachy wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 01:27:03AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> >> I do not see how that is the common use case. Why would I want to print
> >> from my telephone? I
On Mon, 24 May 2021 at 14:36, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-05-22 at 11:57 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 06:32:25AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 4:20 AM Stephen John Smoogen <
> > > smo...@gmail.com
On Mon, 24 May 2021 at 12:29, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 05:14:41PM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > The real issue here is the "once CUPS removes printer driver support"
> > premise that makes a "transition technology" necessary in the first
> place.
> > The change
On Mon, 24 May 2021 at 03:30, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
> On 5/22/21 1:37 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> Yes it is a bad situation but I don’t think there are a set of ‘CUPS’
> developers versus one person trying to keep the software going. Apple
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 18:19 Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> > It is a library for printer applications [1], not a substitute for CUPS.
> > CUPS is still present and is going to be.
> >
> > There will be more printer applications coming
On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 12:50, Colin Walters wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2021, at 12:31 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> > Then maybe FCOS needs to have a major version number to indicate that
> > these breaks are going to happen. I am going to say off the
On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 02:55, Clement Verna
wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> It's not like making changes and breaking upgrades is acceptable in
>> Fedora Linux either.
>
>
> Breaking or non backward compatible changes are acceptable in Fedora Linux
> tho between major version bump. Again here the cgroups v2
On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 18:14, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 08:56:06PM +0100, Nick Howitt wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 17/05/2021 19:32, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > roundcubemail in epel7 is very old at this point, and can never be
> > > upgraded because epel7 has too old a php.
> > >
> > >
On Fri, 14 May 2021 at 13:43, Jerry Geis wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:52 AM Jerry Geis wrote:
>
> > Hi All - I am using getssl on CentOS 7.
> > It have been working fine since Feb 17th and just stopped.
> >
> > My script:
> > getssl -u -a -q
> > getssl: for some reason could not reach
On Fri, 14 May 2021 at 12:28, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 12:01 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:14 AM Matthew Miller
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 10:29:11AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > * Fedora wants to use the latest
On Fri, 14 May 2021 at 11:52, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Hi All - I am using getssl on CentOS 7.
>
which getssl are you using? I could assume https://github.com/srvrco/getssl
but it could be all numbers of things.
If it is that one, then it is written in bash so it should work via bash -x
and
On Fri, 14 May 2021 at 11:25, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:21:26AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > Can we provide these things as modules and make them available in both?
> > > Firefox LTS seems like an ideal candidate, and I can see someone on
> Fedora
> > > Linux
On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 07:14, Jan Staněk wrote:
> Hi all,
> currently, I'm not aware of any collections planned for CentOS 8;
> modularity/AppStream is the prefferred way forward.
>
> Since RedHat does not support collections on RHEL 8, it would take a
> community
> effort to update and maintain
On Wed, 5 May 2021 at 03:33, Евгений Пивнев wrote:
> May be this is trivial question but I cannot find how to package
> application for EPEL8 that requires C++17+
> Adding «Requires: gcc-toolchain-10» into *.spec not helps.
>
The package name is gcc-toolset-9 and it is a SCL so you need to set
On Mon, 3 May 2021 at 10:53, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I like it. Nevertheless, I'll be missing the current page, which lists the
> various services Fedora provides.
>
>
>
The reason we are changing is because of that list. Too many people expect
us to know instantly that something is broken,
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 at 12:35, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30 2021 at 10:59:22 AM -0500, Ron Olson
> wrote:
> > Hm, so does that mean it was packaged specifically for CentOS so it
> > presumably shows up in the CentOS repos?
>
> No, content flow is the reverse in el8:
>
> RHEL 8
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 at 12:26, Mattia Verga via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Il 30/04/21 15:16, Joan Moreau via devel ha scritto:
>
> Thanks but I am really scratching my head to try to understand all this:
>
> 1 - How to get to the "packager" group ou forum or else ?
>
> 2 -
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 at 12:00, Ron Olson wrote:
> Hm, so does that mean it was packaged specifically for CentOS so it
> presumably shows up in the CentOS repos?
>
>
Cmake is not in EPEL but in RHEL. The current version for 8.3 is
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 at 04:09, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> On 28/4/2021 10:35 π.μ., Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>
> > All that, in turn, are very much dependent on community involvement
> > and project management & financing.
>
> By the way, I think that CentOS, before it was "absorbed" by Redhat,
>
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 at 16:22, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> This is (probably) my fault. I played a bit with ipv6 && libvirt, and I
> rebooted the machine, and it doesn't boot up now :-( sorry for the noise.
>
> If there's some console (VPN?) access that we could use to fix such
> problems
> within
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 at 15:20, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> Long story short, I can no longer in good conscience be the primary
> maintainer of (most) Java packages in Fedora. I am not using any of
> them, I don't like Java or any other languages targeting the JVM, and
> don't get
+1
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 at 16:59, Nick Bebout wrote:
> [nebebout@GLFW5M2 fedora-ansible]$ git diff HEAD^
> diff --git a/inventory/group_vars/batcave b/inventory/group_vars/batcave
> index 40c2b393a..5af3b70f7 100644
> --- a/inventory/group_vars/batcave
> +++ b/inventory/group_vars/batcave
> @@
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 15:09, Steve Reed via FreeIPA-users <
freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org> wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> True. I understand that, but I think we are getting off track to my
> original question. Can you run a FIPS FreeIPA server and still have the
> clients work with it? It't
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 11:33, Steve Reed via FreeIPA-users <
freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> So, are you saying that CENTOS is not FIPS compliant? Because there is a
> long list of web sites that state that CENTOS and RHEL are FIPS 140-2
> compliant.
>
>
He is talking
It is spam. I am blocking/removing
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 09:44, Vipul Siddharth
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 6:15 PM Tom Jenner
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi! Check out this article to find description of Angular and React:
> https://itechcraft.com/angular-vs-reactjs/ . It describes pros, cons and
On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 at 08:24, Simon Matter wrote:
> > On 13.04.21 12:33, Simon Matter wrote:
> >>> Once upon a time, Nicolas Kovacs said:
> Both PVE and PBS are based on Debian, and now I wonder if RHEL-based
> systems
> have something similar to offer.
> >>>
> >>> I believe Red
On Sat, 10 Apr 2021 at 02:46, Aurelien Bompard
wrote:
>
> > > * If they are Red Hat employees we can use the internal verify thing
> >
> > Yes. Is there a way we could extend something similar to non-RHers?
>
> That would be interesting, how does it work? Can we replicate it in some
> way?
>
>
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 15:56, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 14:58, Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 14:34, Marius Schwarz
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I had the
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 14:58, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 14:34, Marius Schwarz
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I had the chance check Fedora Workstation Images F33 + F34 Beta on a
>> brandnew Windows Server with Hyper-V latest.
>>
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 14:34, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had the chance check Fedora Workstation Images F33 + F34 Beta on a
> brandnew Windows Server with Hyper-V latest.
>
>
I am able to boot Fedora 33 and Fedora 34 beta iso's on Hyper-V Manager
10.0.19041.1 but I don't know if you could
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 12:40, Valeri Galtsev
wrote:
>
>
> On 4/9/21 11:23 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 12:19, Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 12:02, Valeri Galtsev
> >
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 12:19, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 12:02, Valeri Galtsev
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 4/9/21 10:47 AM, Binet, Valere (NIH/NIA/IRP) [C] wrote:
>> > The NIST and CIS baselines don't allow su, we h
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 12:02, Valeri Galtsev
wrote:
>
>
> On 4/9/21 10:47 AM, Binet, Valere (NIH/NIA/IRP) [C] wrote:
> > The NIST and CIS baselines don't allow su, we have to use sudo on
> government computers.
> >
>
> Could you enlighten me on the rationale behind that restriction? As, as
> you
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 10:02, Andy Romens via Cygwin
wrote:
> Hi Cygwin (or whoever gets these, I just signed up),
>
> I got a question for you all. I need to update Apache from 2.4.39 to
> 2.4.46. I have searched far and wide on the web to see if there is a way to
> do that, but so far nothing
On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 at 13:45, Nick Howitt wrote:
> What is the current status of EPEL7 packages for ARM? As far as I can
> make out, aarch64 seems to have been frozen in 2019 when RedHad stopped
> the architecture support? I also thing there has never been official
> armhfp support but the
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 22:26, Honggang LI wrote:
> Hi,
> After input my FAS accout and password, I got this error message.
>
>
After input where? What place did you get this error?
> =
>
> 500 Internal Server Error
>
> Could not convert return value of the view
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 13:05, Warren Young wrote:
> On Apr 5, 2021, at 8:32 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >
> > wrt private keys .. we don't want any to live on machines we
> > don't physically own.
>
> Yeah, I get that.
>
> What I don’t get is why, if DNF goes to http://foo.centos.org to pull
>
Congratulations Nick.
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 11:48, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> I'm happy to announce that Nick Bebout(fas: nb, irc: nb)
> has been added to our sysadmin-main group.
>
> This is the core group of trusted folks that high level access to most
> everything in fedora
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 08:41, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Up until recently I've hosted all my stuff (web & mail) on a handful of
> bare
> metal servers. Web applications (WordPress, OwnCloud, Dolibarr, GEPI,
> Roundcube) as well as mail and a few other things were hosted mostly on
> one big
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 05:11, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> More often than not, when installing CentOS, I choose manual partitioning
> and
> then apply the KISS principle, with a very simple partitioning scheme that
> looks more or less like this:
>
> * /boot partition: 500 MB, ext2
> *
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 at 16:47, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 09:34:49PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > Dnia Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 03:26:53PM -0500, Brandon Nielsen napisał(a):
> > > On 3/26/21 3:24 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 02:48:39PM -0400,
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 at 16:27, Brandon Nielsen wrote:
> On 3/26/21 3:24 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 02:48:39PM -0400, Christopher wrote:
> [Snip]
> >> * In many places, including accounts.fedoraproject.org, in order to
> >> log in, you have to append the OTP to your
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 13:04, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 3/22/21 6:56 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >
> >
> > My main problem is that for a good portion of the 1990's the GNU
> > operating system was HURD and any and all work on Linux was seen as a
> &
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 02:09, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 3/9/21 7:43 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> 2. Why Linux and not GNU/Linux? Linux is just a kernel. GNU/Linux is an OS.
>
> Fedora Linux is an OS. Although GNU project utilities are indeed essential,
> Fedora Linux consists of more than
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 12:44, Mark Woolfson wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I wonder if you could help.
>
>
>
> I have a requirement to load CentOS 7.3 on to a server. I have the
> distribution on a bootable USB key.
>
>
>
What kind of server? This is a hardware issue and is going to need to know
what
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 10:56, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 3/18/21 10:23 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > [what can be done] I am guessing
> > someone could make an unofficial set of spins which cut out some
> packages to try and make it fit in single density.
> >
> Th
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 09:36, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 3/18/21 1:24 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> > It's not realistic to expect server-class machines not to be able to
> > boot from dual-layer or USB media in 2021.
> There are environments where USB or other writeable media are not
> allowed on
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 16:26, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 3/15/21 8:51 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Exactly that. Upstream Fedora and RHEL went to require dual density
> around
> > Fedora 18, RHEL-7 because the amount of data was too much.
> Well, what's odd is that the
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 12:00, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Hi.
> In Copr we use postgresql on copr-frontend. I decide that it is time to
> split it off to separate server. I am going to
> create new machine in AWS and deploy postgresql there. I have several open
> questions:
>
> * is there interest
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 at 18:24, Davide Cavalca via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-03-14 at 13:47 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > The eln composes (at least as far as I know) are done via ODCS
> > (on demand compose service) and are already available on the master
> >
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 at 16:42, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 05:09:44PM -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> I'm not sure this is all a super big deal, but I'd really like to make
> sure we make _very_ clear who is responsible for what. Some maintainers
> would be happy to maintain for
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 08:19, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Sun, 14 Mar 2021 21:49:40 -0500 "Robert G. \(Doc\) Savage" <
> dsav...@peaknet.net>, CentOS mailing list wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sun, 2021-03-14 at 21:31 -0400, John Plemons wrote:
> > > Sounds like you need to use a dual layer DVD disc, it is
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 at 10:04, David McGuffey wrote:
> I have a Nikon slide scanner (very high quality) for which the software
> has not been updated. It last ran on WinXP SP3 and I was not able to
> get it to run under Win 7 and certainly not Win 10.
>
> Anyone know where I can obtain images of
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 12:51, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 11:10:50AM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> > It may also have something to do with what Marius said about Fedora
> possibly
> > running on Pinephone and other devices, which apparently need bleeding
> edge stuff
rs 2021 à 21:15, Stephen John Smoogen a écrit :
>
>
>
> OK I am assigning the ticket to you. I don't know what is causing this not
> to work.
>
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 14:46, Patrick Vavrina
> wrote:
>
>> I haven’t “Take” after “None”.
>>
>>
>> Le 9
n the right hand column something
like
*Assignee*
None — Take
click on Take and it should assign it to you.
>
> Le 9 mars 2021 à 18:41, Stephen John Smoogen a écrit :
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 10:37, Patrick Vavrina
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Kevin,
>>
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 12:46, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 09.03.2021 18:20, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > Feel free to start your own distro with whatever name
> > *you* choose;-)
>
> I'm Fedora maintainer too, so I have the right to show my point of view
> on
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 10:37, Patrick Vavrina wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Thanks a lot for your response.
>
> I’m interested in participating to package Ansible.
>
> As Fedora apprentice I saw that ticket concerns me:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9693
>
> Could I fix it?
>
> Have a
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 at 12:34, Mattia Verga via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> I'm just wondering: what's the benefit of packaging Python noarch
> projects in Fedora?
>
> I can see the reason about packaging architecture specific packages,
> since they will benefit of optimizations
On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 18:39, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-03-07 at 11:17 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> > Everyone,
> >
> > We have migrated a platform to a Centos 8 host using kvm guest machines
> >
> > Recently I tried to copy one of the guests to the external SD card on
> > the back of
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 at 01:11, romulasry via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Preferribly a git version with all packages would be nice
>
>
Are you proposing to do the work? Or are you looking for people to do the
work?
> Hope this is the right place to put this, if not what list,
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 16:21, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 06:56:24AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > I think we are all using different short hand definitions of what we want
> > to happen and are seeing each other skip steps because of that. I am
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 13:50, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
snip
>
> IIRC a default GNOME workstation install consumes about 700-800MB of RAM
> when logged into the desktop on a 1G RAM system. After I've done a bunch of
> hacks / tweaks to remove a long list of unnecessary (1) processes I have
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 11:21, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> > It has very limited functionality by design. If you do not want to use
> SSSD, you can keep using sssd profile and just disable the service. It will
> keep working. The minimal profile is there for users that also want to
> remove
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 04:27, Russell VT via Cygwin
wrote:
> Cygwin Enthusiasts!
> ...
>
> So, I understand... that's a LONG way to go to ask all of y'all, how do we
> fix this thing? Can someone point me at a good reference to being a Cygwin
> contributor, to the point that I can actually help
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 03:01, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 09:46:52AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> > On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 01:04:56AM +, Davide Cavalca via devel wrote:
> > > Yes, the idea I had in mind was that each package that currenty has an
> > > "epel8" branch would
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 17:13, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 01:53:28PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > 4) We could add some kind of GSSAPI/Kerberos support to pagure, so
> > people could use https and a kerberos ticket.
>
> What's amount of effort required for this option? Because
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 12:40, Frederick wrote:
> Thank you!
>
> I am specifically looking for the dlm package that seems to be missing
> from the repos in 8. I went to https://git.centos.org/rpms/dlm but I
> cannot find the source. Is there anywhere I can get the source to
> build this package?
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 09:54, Jerry Geis wrote:
> When I "tar" up an archive the files have an owner bob,
> when I extract that to another machine bob is there also but user number is
> different.
> So when I extract bob is no longer the owner of the files but someone else.
>
> Is there a good
On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 20:41, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 3/1/21 4:31 PM, Joshua Kramer wrote:
> > Do those scripts also handle the building of Objective-C, which is
> > needed to build SOGo? I have been toying with this off and on,
> > there's an independent repo somewhere that has the EL8
On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 20:18, Davide Cavalca via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-03-01 at 15:49 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > That would require a lot of changes in both EPEL and in Fedora. In
> > Fedora there is a general expectat
On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 14:46, Davide Cavalca via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-03-01 at 09:26 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > I'd like to encourage anyone interested in this meeting to submit
> > agenda topics by replying to this email. Currently the agenda
>
>
On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 14:21, Simon Matter wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 12:46, Simon Matter
> wrote:
> >
>
> > EPEL has always been in the need of more people who can volunteer time to
> > help maintain and package things. However for the last 5 years (so even
> > before EL8) the need has
On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 12:46, Simon Matter wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 10:42, Simon Matter
> wrote:
> >
> >> > Am 01.03.21 um 15:56 schrieb Simon Matter:
> >>
> >> >> Thanks for your suggestion. No, I'm not really thinking about
> >> >> docker/podman. I prefer having clean system installs,
On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 10:42, Simon Matter wrote:
> > Am 01.03.21 um 15:56 schrieb Simon Matter:
>
> >> Thanks for your suggestion. No, I'm not really thinking about
> >> docker/podman. I prefer having clean system installs, even if I have to
> >> create RPMs myself. This has worked fine for the
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 17:26, Gionatan Danti wrote:
> Il 2021-02-25 22:35 Stephen John Smoogen ha scritto:
> > Mainly because customers don't want to pay for that work which is
> > considerable. If Red Hat builds it, it is expected to have all kinds of
> > 'promises' eq
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 16:10, Gionatan Danti wrote:
> Il 2021-02-25 14:27 Simon Matter ha scritto:
> > EL on the other side has a very limited, supported package set and
> > therefore a lot of packages needed to build a lot of packages are just
> > missing.
>
> Yeah, same impressions here. EPEL
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 10:07, J Martin Rushton <
martinrushto...@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 25/02/2021 14:49, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 09:13, J Martin Rushton via CentOS
> > mailto:centos@centos.org>> w
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 09:13, J Martin Rushton via CentOS
wrote:
>
>
> On 25/02/2021 13:37, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> I was recently looking at Raymond's book "The Art of UNIX Programming"
> from 2003. He, along with contributors Thompson (inventor of UNIX),
&
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 08:18, Tony Schreiner
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 7:31 AM Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 02:11, Simon Matter
> wrote:
> >
> > > >>
> > > >> Smooge, you know I feel your pain, but b
On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 at 18:54, Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Matthew Miller wrote:
> > I don't think "documentation is harder to keep up to date there" is
> right,
>
> Well, I guess it does not apply that much to the pages which were already
> in
> an ACL-locked
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 02:11, Simon Matter wrote:
> >>
> >> Smooge, you know I feel your pain, but becoming a maintainer in EPEL has
> >> a pretty high bar (lots of new tools and methods to work with, amongst
> >> other things) -- as it SHOULD, given that it's intended as an addon to
> >> EL and
On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 09:47, Simon Matter wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Feb 2021, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On a remote server (in an IPv6-only infrastructure) I am getting the
> >> following error when trying to update CentOS 8 Streams x86_64:
> >>
> >> $ sudo dnf upgrade
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 at 12:04, Simon Matter wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 at 04:47, Simon Matter
> wrote:
> >
> >> >
> >> > Smooge, you know I feel your pain, but becoming a maintainer in EPEL
> >> has
> >> > a pretty high bar (lots of new tools and methods to work with, amongst
> >> > other
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 at 04:47, Simon Matter wrote:
> >
> > Smooge, you know I feel your pain, but becoming a maintainer in EPEL has
> > a pretty high bar (lots of new tools and methods to work with, amongst
> > other things) -- as it SHOULD, given that it's intended as an addon to
> > EL and
201 - 300 of 4483 matches
Mail list logo
