On 02/21/2017 08:59 PM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> I am glad you found the culprit and told us what it is. I would have
> never guessed it to be an SDL bug caused by such subtle interactions.
Its weirder than that. The input bug hasn't any obvious effect on the video
animation until after you add
t. I assume
> this was an accident, since nothing indicates otherwise.)
>
>
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 21:56:03 +1300
> Bryan Baldwin <br...@katofiad.co.nz> wrote:
>
>> I don't know why you mentioned Wayland. As a reference point? I'm not
>> presently developing wit
bincbyqRIBgJE.bin
Description: PGP/MIME version identification
encrypted.asc
Description: OpenPGP encrypted message
___
xdg mailing list
xdg@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
Okay, so further investigation has lead me to test code against evdev
directly. Nevermind ;)
On 02/20/2017 11:19 AM, Bryan Baldwin wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've been writing game code, and have gone adrift with a big problem
> with keyboard input.
>
> The properties I'm ge
Hello all,
I've been writing game code, and have gone adrift with a big problem
with keyboard input.
The properties I'm getting through SDL2 contain key up/down,
pressed/released, and repeat. I've read either that the pressed/released
properties are only set with the key actually physically
On 01/04/2016 08:39 AM, Mitt Green wrote:
> Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
>
> >I want to point out, that TDE is very configurable (which cannot be said
> >from GNOME 2/3),
> >and kmail is the best mail client with maildir support available.
>
> My personal problems with TDE:
> - it's a Qt DE;
> -
You don't *asterisk* need to make a *asterisk* derivative work from nd sources.
Just write an *asterisk* original work about it.
This is *asterisk* actually what the FSF and GNU ppl want you to do. They do
*asterisk* not want to be the central source for all things free, either.
Just say it in
On 04/26/15 20:24, rysiek wrote:
Problem is -- and this very discussion shows it *very* well -- that even with
such restrictive license put on works of opinion (I do not subscribe to the
view that this distinction is relevant, but let's work with that), views
*are*
misunderstood.
So,
On 04/26/15 02:36, Jim Garrett wrote:
Am I correct in thinking that running a server for this purpose requires a
static IP address?
No. You can enlist the aid of a dynamic dns service. I use DNSexit. The catch
of this solution is that you must run a script on your server that periodically
On 04/27/15 02:51, rysiek wrote:
Maybe we could at least try to keep it civil on this list, please?
#$%^*(){ is %^$)(@^$%ing ^*()
Several years ago volunteers of an organisation I worked for translated the
following article:
http://ur1.ca/g5iwh
We reached out to FSF for permission to
On 12/30/2014 09:45 AM, Riley Baird wrote:
Is there any significant reason, other than the license, that gcc is
better than clang? I really don't want to deviate too much from
upstream, and as long as the license is free, I don't see a problem.
If it's about the license, I can see that
On 10/26/2013 02:08 AM, Wolfgang Keller
wrote:
And that may be the origin of the problem, SINCE IN ALL CAPS IT IS PLAIN
UNREADABLE AND THUS NO ONE WILL ACTUALLY READ IT.
That's backwards. Its part of the solution. It doesn't matter if you
read it
On 10/26/2013 02:08 AM, Wolfgang Keller
wrote:
And that may be the origin of the problem, SINCE IN ALL CAPS IT IS PLAIN
UNREADABLE AND THUS NO ONE WILL ACTUALLY READ IT.
That's backwards. Its part of the solution. It doesn't matter if you
read it
On 10/26/2013 02:08 AM, Wolfgang Keller
wrote:
And that may be the origin of the problem, SINCE IN ALL CAPS IT IS PLAIN
UNREADABLE AND THUS NO ONE WILL ACTUALLY READ IT.
That's backwards. Its part of the solution. It doesn't matter if you
read it
On 10/25/2013 05:32 AM, Ken Springer
wrote:
snip
We know your argument. Seriously, We've heard it everywhere all the
time...end-less-ly. Everybody wishes that their software was robust
with magic documentation and free specialists that will fix
On 10/25/2013 01:29 PM, Ken Springer
wrote:
On
10/24/13 5:13 PM, Bryan Baldwin wrote:
On 10/25/2013 05:32 AM, Ken Springer
wrote:
snip
We know your argument. Seriously, We've heard
On 10/25/2013 04:55 PM, gordon_cooper
wrote:
I quit
I thought the very same thing, except 99% of the time the LYX list
has interesting news, is genuinely helpful, and quitting only would
only be a punishment to myself because the 1% hurt my delicate
On 10/25/2013 05:32 AM, Ken Springer
wrote:
snip
We know your argument. Seriously, We've heard it everywhere all the
time...end-less-ly. Everybody wishes that their software was robust
with magic documentation and free specialists that will fix
On 10/25/2013 01:29 PM, Ken Springer
wrote:
On
10/24/13 5:13 PM, Bryan Baldwin wrote:
On 10/25/2013 05:32 AM, Ken Springer
wrote:
snip
We know your argument. Seriously, We've heard
On 10/25/2013 04:55 PM, gordon_cooper
wrote:
I quit
I thought the very same thing, except 99% of the time the LYX list
has interesting news, is genuinely helpful, and quitting only would
only be a punishment to myself because the 1% hurt my delicate
On 10/25/2013 05:32 AM, Ken Springer
wrote:
We know your argument. Seriously, We've heard it everywhere all the
time...end-less-ly. Everybody wishes that their software was robust
with magic documentation and free specialists that will fix your
On 10/25/2013 01:29 PM, Ken Springer
wrote:
On
10/24/13 5:13 PM, Bryan Baldwin wrote:
On 10/25/2013 05:32 AM, Ken Springer
wrote:
We know your argument. Seriously, We've heard it everywhere
On 10/25/2013 04:55 PM, gordon_cooper
wrote:
I quit
I thought the very same thing, except 99% of the time the LYX list
has interesting news, is genuinely helpful, and quitting only would
only be a punishment to myself because the <1% hurt my delicate
On 07/16/2013 02:06 PM, Walter Bender
wrote:
http://www.infoworld.com/d/open-source-software/github-finally-takes-open-source-licenses-seriously-222708
Only the microsite, http://choosealicense.com, afaict GitHub itself
is still completely
Was the video for this ever published? If so I apologize, but I haven't
seen the link posted here?
___
Fsf-collab-discuss mailing list
Fsf-collab-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/fsf-collab-discuss
On 03/30/13 01:00, Jerry dePriest wrote:
3. Let's discuss what a douchebag you are for downplaying something
by putting it into the scope of a chain letter? That's confirmation
you are in fact a true douchebag...
Its worse than a chain letter. Its like psychotic religious cults
shoving drivel
On 03/30/13 01:00, Jerry dePriest wrote:
I forogt New Zeland is just another offshoot of the penal colony
Austrailia used to be. You can't help it, it's in your genes...
I'm not expatriate. New Zealand is not now nor has ever been a penal
colony, except in the pilot episode of Star Trek -
On 03/27/13 16:21, Jerry dePriest wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/180686205383827/
It is possbile to avoid spamming the list with Facebook tracts?
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
On 03/28/13 04:31, Jerry dePriest wrote:
I said sorry... what if it was your relative? what if it was the cops
fucking with your family?
There are places for these kinds of conversations, which are not here.
There are and will be seemingly urgent problems that some person
somewhere is going to
On 01/17/13 11:33, William Harrington wrote:
Other archs I hope others can help with the builds.
I'm building MIPS64EL on loongson2f.
___
Clfs-dev mailing list
Clfs-dev@lists.cross-lfs.org
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-dev-cross-lfs.org
On 01/06/13 09:21, Michael Dorrington wrote:
Part of the problem is that the FSF puts 'nice' content^1 in
unmodifiable sections of their manuals. What if someone wrote a manual
for their software which had content in an unmodifiable section that
you found particularly 'un-nice' but you found
On 11/30/12 02:29, Osamu Aoki wrote:
I think that analysis is quite sound. But I would add something to:
1) Exclusion of GFDL documentation of some essential software packages.
This may be weak objection point from FSF based on Complete Distros.
If not being a complete enough distribution
I think that you are reading too much into what copyright licenses can
do for you, or possibly mixing up the inspiration one gains from such
works with the direct modification of them. For instance, I can draft
art images in the style of Frank Frazetta, and make the figures,
animals, and monsters
On 11/24/12 12:55, Michael Gilbert wrote:
That link has no guidance from the FSF yet. That bug log includes
only senior debian developers engaged in a debate about the issue. If
FSF doesn't produce guidance there, then the decision that happens
there will only a barometer of a certain subset
On 11/24/12 05:03, Mason Loring Bliss wrote:
An amusing comparison may be drawn between the FSF's rejection of
four-clause BSD licenses and the FSF's support of invariant sections
in the GFDL.
Documentation is not software. I wouldn't be surprised to find
differences when comparing licenses
On 10/05/2012 05:51 AM, Patrick wrote:
I'd better not answer this. I should wind things down now. The FSF
foundation and it's members care about free software but the scope of
concerns stops there. FSF compatible licences do not protect charitable
software from becoming for-profit, period.
On 10/04/2012 10:52 AM, Patrick wrote:
All you are doing is looking down on people, it's useless
I would be interested to know how it is that FSF is preventing you from
writing a license that serves your absurd desires? Refusing to do your
work for you is not the same as locking you down.
It
On 09/03/2012 03:04 PM, William Harrington wrote:
On Sep 2, 2012, at 05:00 AM, Martin Ward wrote:
On 02/09/12 03:47, William Harrington wrote:
Greetings All,
An issue we need to discuss.
In the final system we do not have an ftp client (which can be used
to ftp to a server to get curl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/06/2012 07:49 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:50:23AM +, Clint Adams wrote:
Do you understand how a sane and honest person might disagree
with you given the preponderance of evidence?
I agree and this is one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/04/2012 08:12 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
I agree with the FSF when they say: Debian also provides a
repository of nonfree software.
I don't believe that putting the non-free software
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/05/2012 11:01 AM, Mason Loring Bliss wrote:
I tried in my small way to pursue Debian's inclusion in the FSF
free distributions list. [...] I've heard just enough of Bryan's
sort of views to solidy my opinion. [...] Support for non-free
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/09/2011 11:09 PM, Muhammad El-Sergani wrote:
Guys, no replies?
Hi all,
Can anyone help shed some light as to what exaclty FreeText, and such, are?
Freetext are containers into which you may store ancillary information
about a ticket or an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Lyx lovers,
I've had a long time interest in LaTeX TeX and Lyx, and finally made
some time to dig into the software and learn how to write all my
documents using this incredible program.
Thank you for your efforts.
Bryan
-BEGIN PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Lyx lovers,
I've had a long time interest in LaTeX TeX and Lyx, and finally made
some time to dig into the software and learn how to write all my
documents using this incredible program.
Thank you for your efforts.
Bryan
-BEGIN PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Lyx lovers,
I've had a long time interest in LaTeX TeX and Lyx, and finally made
some time to dig into the software and learn how to write all my
documents using this incredible program.
Thank you for your efforts.
Bryan
-BEGIN PGP
Follow-up Comment #5, task #10523 (project administration):
Opps, I had been replying directly from email. No one ever saw my response.
Here is my response from August 2nd:
I can understand not wanting to host entire distributions of software,
because I don't want this either. GNU+Linux from
Additional Item Attachment, task #10523 (project administration):
File name: glfsc.tar.xz Size:0 KB
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?10523
___
Additional Item Attachment, task #10523 (project administration):
File name: glfsc.tar Size:170 KB
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?10523
___
Follow-up Comment #3, task #10523 (project administration):
Yes, I have a git repo ready to go up when you are ready :)
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?10523
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/23/2010 05:58 AM, Quiliro Ordóñez wrote:
Does anyone have any idea what this is? I found it here
http://sourceforge.net/projects/linuxfreedomfor/ It is in italian so I do
not understand what it proposes.
Sky24 seems to be a way to view the
On 08/19/2010 05:08 PM, Yasir Mughal wrote:
Is there any way to remove unwanted Config Items?
The simplest thing you can do is set the item to invalid.
Bryan
-
OTRS mailing list: itsm - Webpage: http://otrs.org/
On 08/19/2010 06:40 PM, Yasir Mughal wrote:
The invalid option is for the metadata, I am looking for delete
option for the actual data. For example I was adding information for
computers, and out of 8 entries, one is incorrect and I want to delete
that.
I don't see why you can't simply make
On 08/14/2010 12:56 AM, Мажар Денис wrote:
Hi All. I've upgrade otrs from 2.2.5 to 2.4.7 through 2.3 version. But
now when I log in to web interface I can see only No Permission to use
this frontend module! message. What can I do with this?
Assuming that you follow through with each and every
On 07/24/2010 11:07 PM, paul gore wrote:
Yes, I meant notifications section. My problem is I do not see any
customer related notifications available there, only agents.
I have seen similar problem reported here with no reply. So is it a
bug? Can it be fixed?
Its not a bug of which I am aware.
URL:
http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?10523
Summary: Submission of GNU+Linux from Source Code
Project: Savannah Administration
Submitted by: bryan
Submitted on: Sun 25 Jul 2010 09:31:55 PM GMT
Should Start On: Sun 25 Jul 2010
On 07/24/2010 09:52 AM, paul gore wrote:
I did try to look at notification events, but I do not see any related
to a customer, only agents. Is it a bug?
Notification Events is not the correct place. Look for the notification
text in the Notifications section of the Admin control panel. Scroll
On 07/23/2010 03:09 AM, Marek Hall wrote:
I've been searching for some time, but could not find the option to
see all registered and closed tickets. Is this available in OTRS?
Also, would be nice to get an overview of all tickets related to the
custom service.
Hi Marek,
You can get a list of
Hi Amit,
Phone tickets are sent directly to a queue and do not have a CC field.
If you need to CC someone in your message...use the Email Ticket
function.
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 05:58 -0700, Amit Sharma wrote:
Hi,
How do I enable/add CC field in phone ticket?
--
Bryan Baldwin
OTRS AG
Norsk
Hi Alan,
You might also want to try creating test tickets and moving at least one
active ticket into each of your new queues. Then they should show when
their parent has been selected. I know from experience that our system
doesn't show a the queue if the queue has no tickets.
Bryan
On
Hello all,
I'm developing a prototype build system for GNU+Linux that can be used
stand-alone or as the base for other more refined distributions with
specialized goals. My impetus is to have a flexible design for a system
I would love administering. The vision for my project is to be to
60 matches
Mail list logo
