Hello there,
After bumping upstream version in "python-apsw", I have noticed that a new
Python .pyi file was created in the new version, so the package build
process started to fail:
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/apsw.pyi
Hello,
I'm going to orphan "ustl" package for several reasons:
- the library is generally deprecated;
- the maintainer has switched the C++ library type to static, which makes
shared lib support no longer possible.
It should be harmless since there are no packages that depend on "ustl".
$ dnf
Hello,
I'm going to orphan "ustl" package for several reasons:
- the library is generally deprecated;
- the maintainer has switched the C++ library type to static, which makes
shared lib support no longer possible.
It should be harmless since there are no packages that depend on "ustl".
$ dnf
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 6:47 AM Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Denis Fateyev wrote:
> > The "ustl" upstream, for which I maintain the RPM package, has recently
> > switched from providing a shared library to a static library.
Hello all,
The "ustl" upstream, for which I maintain the RPM package, has recently
switched from providing a shared library to a static library.
So I'm going to make changes in the package, and provide everything in
"-devel" subpackage.
I have looked through
Thank you, all variants work fine.
Now I have another issue with "nfdump" package, probably for the same
reason: a build flag interference.
I use '-fPIC' in LDFLAGS to make "configure" happy:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nfdump/blob/rawhide/f/nfdump.spec#_49
I suspect that this flag
Hello all,
Recently, I have found that with GCC version bump in F36 some of my
packages are stopped to build, or stopped to build properly during the
planned package rebuild.
They were fine under F35 — but apparently there are some changes in newer
GCC that affected them.
For example,
Hello all,
I have a new package request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011964 , which needs to be
reviewed.
If anyone is interested in a review swap — feel free to take it, and I can
review another package in return.
Thanks!
--
wbr, Denis.
could be
used for packaging Go binary packages.
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 7:17 PM Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
> Le 2020-08-20 22:05, Denis Fateyev a écrit :
>
> >>> Could anybody provide some more info: are Go rpm macroses not
> >> fully backported to RHEL8 currently? An
andro Saez Morollon
wrote:
> Hi Denis.
>
> Which package gave you issues? Just to try to build it by myself.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 10:17 PM Denis Fateyev wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Originally posted to go-sig@, but haven't got any a
Hello all,
Originally posted to go-sig@, but haven't got any answer, maybe here will
be better luck.
I have recently tried to rebuild some Golang modules packages against
epel8, and found out that there were build issues at "%goprep".
Could anybody provide some more info: are Go rpm macroses
dfateyev merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test-mysqld` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Use the correct name of the required package
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-mysqld/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
anything.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 3:56 AM Denis Fateyev wrote:
> Beside the real vulnerability, what is interesting that Qualys used an
> outdated Fedora package to prepare the report:
>
> On Linux, this vulnerability is generally not exploitable because
> /proc/sys/fs/protected_har
Beside the real vulnerability, what is interesting that Qualys used an
outdated Fedora package to prepare the report:
On Linux, this vulnerability is generally not exploitable because
/proc/sys/fs/protected_hardlinks prevents attackers from creating
hardlinks to files they do not own. On Fedora
Hello there,
I have got an Asus notebook with Optimus technology support on board:
$ lspci -vnn | grep '\''[030[02]\]'
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation HD Graphics 530
[8086:191b] (rev 06) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
01:00.0 3D controller [0302]: NVIDIA Corporation
>
> ../../smtpd/ca.c: In function 'ca_X509_verify':
> ../../smtpd/ca.c:204:47: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> 'X509_STORE_CTX' {aka 'struct x509_store_ctx_st'}
> 204 |*errstr = X509_verify_cert_error_string(xsc->error);
>
This can be fixed in "smtpd/ca.c" with:
- *errstr
Hello Gilles,
Tried to rebuild on Fedora 30, but got compile errors (providing below with
warnings in case if you find them useful):
--- < cut here > ---
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../smtpd -I../../openbsd-compat
-I../../openbsd-compat/err_h
Hello Paul,
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Paul Howarth <p...@city-fan.org> wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
>
> On 22/11/15 15:28, Denis Fateyev wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Paul Howarth <p...@city-fan.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> As a data poi
Hello there,
Just a friendly note if anybody interested but just missed it occasionally:
the whole POE stack is now orphaned in Fedora devel.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-POE/
I really dislike the idea that this great thing would be gone from Fedora
forever, I use it
Hello there,
I've taken python-llfuse (ass requested earlier) and python-apsw.
--
wbr, Denis.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hello there,
Does anybody know how to contact Marcel Wysocki ("m...@satgnu.net", FAS
login: maci)?
While ago, according the policy I've initiated nonresponsive maintainer
procedure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304786 , since there
is no contact with main contact for Fedora
Greetings,
We are preparing a major update for 'libtommath' library [1]. The last
stable release happened more than 5 years ago, so there are a lot of
changes and improvements over the time.
Although there are still some open requests in upstream, the current
library state looks pretty stable to
Greetings,
We are preparing a major update for 'libtommath' library [1]. The last
stable release happened more than 5 years ago, so there are a lot of
changes and improvements over the time.
Although there are still some open requests in upstream, the current
library state looks pretty stable to
Hello list,
A while ago, I've created a Whirlpool hash function library [1] based on
the original implementation of Whirlpool algorithm by Vincent Rijmen and
Paulo S. L. M. Barreto.
It's packaged as 'libwhirlpool' in Fedora and EPEL [2].
Also provides 'whirlpoolsum' utility to calculate and
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Orion Poplawski
wrote:
> On 01/06/2016 10:51 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > Also, now that 35 is out, do we want to switch epel7 to python35 before
> > we go building out things much more?
> >
> > kevin
>
> Actually, I think it would be nice to
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Orion Poplawski <or...@cora.nwra.com>
wrote:
> On 12/30/2015 10:00 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > On 12/30/2015 12:16 AM, Denis Fateyev wrote:
> >> Actually, I've opened a bug against 'msgpack':
> >> https://bugzilla.r
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Orion Poplawski <or...@cora.nwra.com>
wrote:
> On 12/30/2015 10:00 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > On 12/30/2015 12:16 AM, Denis Fateyev wrote:
> >> Actually, I've opened a bug against 'msgpack':
> >> https://bugzilla.r
On Dec 24, 2015 7:31 PM, "Gilles Chehade" <gil...@poolp.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 07:17:12PM +0600, Denis Fateyev wrote:
> >
> > Well, you asked what distributions packagers thought, and I presented it
> > from point of the specific distr
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> Would your distribution be affected if LibreSSL became a requirement ?
>
> OpenSMTPD is starting to rely on LibreSSL-specific functions that will
> force us to go through painful hacks to maintain that dual SSL support
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> What I'm wondering is if there's any reason that would prevent RHEL, for
> example, to package LibreSSL in the same way that libasr was packaged so
> that OpenSMTPD could specifically depend on it.
>
> The system would
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
>
> As a data point of interest, I unbundled libtomcrypt from python-crypto
> when it became possible:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087557
>
> Paul.
>
Thanks for the answer. Under these circumstances I
Hello there,
I'm going to package CryptX Perl module [1] soon.
The only concern is that it contains a lot of XS-based code of ciphers and
hashes that can be probably considered as bundled. Mostly the used
routines, including sha1, sha2 and md5 implementations, are based on
LibTomCrypt library
Hello there,
For test purposes, I've tried to build a graph from HTTP server answer
codes, but everytime it says that a numeric value expected:
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-tOPv_FUa_NQ/VXF8X0EjzAI/GKU/BVYKKlnlK60/s1600/glog04.png
OK, that could be, and
Hello there,
Is there a way to show charts on a dashboard exactly as they seen
preliminary in search results?
In other words, I have this graph in search results:
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/--KiGiWvsEtg/VXCy5wjIPsI/GJo/jIsCGxcUMyc/s1600/glog01.png
But the generated graph on the
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:50 PM, Michael Friedrich
michael.friedr...@gmail.com wrote:
That's certainly true, but requires additional 2 repositories beind
added/trusted. Apart from EPEL, this becomes a critical problem in certain
(customer) environments. Although it's more of an issue with
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:05 PM, EML sa212+ici...@cyconix.com wrote:
I'm just installing icinga2 on Centos 5.6. This was easy until I got to
the additional instructions for icingaweb2. 'yum install icingaweb2' fails,
and some investigation shows that there isn't an icingaweb2 package at the
Hello there,
Recently started working with Icinga 2, installed it from RPM packages,
added some hosts. And here is the question: how could I customize some
default service parameters for some hosts *properly* ?
For example, I need to check a ssh-port which is unique for each host.
I've stumbled
Hmm, I thought you already dropped bdb dependency, but:
--
checking db_185.h usability... no
checking db_185.h presence... no
checking for db_185.h... no
checking db.h usability... no
checking db.h presence... no
checking for db.h... no
checking db1/db.h usability... no
, May 13, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Gilles Chehade gil...@poolp.org wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 04:26:31PM +0600, Denis Fateyev wrote:
Hmm, I thought you already dropped bdb dependency, but:
--
checking db_185.h usability... no
checking db_185.h presence... no
checking
Hello there,
Recently, I've got several such messages for each of new submitted packages.
Is there something wrong with the upstream monitoring for Perl modules?
Thanks.
-- Forwarded message --
From: notificati...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:59 PM
Subject:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Gilles Chehade gil...@poolp.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 02:07:25AM +0600, Denis Fateyev wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:52 AM, Eric Faurot e...@poolp.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 12:04:51AM +0600, Denis Fateyev wrote:
Just a small
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:52 AM, Eric Faurot e...@poolp.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 12:04:51AM +0600, Denis Fateyev wrote:
Just a small nit-picking. Once was a discussion about license
filename spelling.
[1]https://www.mail-archive.com/misc@opensmtpd.org/msg01513.html
Just a small nit-picking. Once was a discussion about license filename
spelling.
https://www.mail-archive.com/misc@opensmtpd.org/msg01513.html
Not a problem at all, but *might* be a small cleanup.
---
wbr, Denis.
between EN_GB and EN_US was one that always irritated me.
On 12/27/2014 03:56 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
On 2014-12-28 05:01, Denis Fateyev wrote:
In English both versions are possible.
But 'license' indeed sounds better, IMO.
I'm just pointing out that different tarballs
Tested on RHEL6 and Fedora 20 with opensmtpd-5.4.4-rc2, no regressions
found.
--
wbr, Denis.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Gilles Chehade gil...@poolp.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 02:57:52PM +0100, gilles chehade wrote:
A new libasr snapshot is available at:
Hello there,
Tested on RHEL6,7 and Fedora 19,20,21 with the latest libasr snapshot
(201412141738), haven't seen any errors.
Seems now it's fine.
I think, it's time to introduce libasr release numeration (0.1, 1.0, or
whatever you like.)
--
wbr, Denis.
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Gilles
I saw that with 5.4.4-rc1.
Not sure in which recent snapshot it has been introduced.
I'll do some checks with previous snapshots today or tomorrow when time
permits..
--
wbr, Denis.
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Gilles Chehade gil...@poolp.org wrote:
Do you experience this with snapshots
Sure thing.
Opened a new ticket: https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD/issues/503
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Gilles Chehade gil...@poolp.org wrote:
Do you mind opening a ticket ?
I was talking to eric@ and asking him if he had a chance to look at this
and he had missed this :-/
--
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Devel-Timer:
92b8d96b9e1a01360a17224ff0351548 Devel-Timer-0.06.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 7c7d58cb853f3ea0ad8626adf2c30887b16d9a50
Author: Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com
Date: Mon Nov 10 01:00:39 2014 +0600
perl-Devel-Timer: version 0.06
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Devel-Timer.spec | 18 ++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8
Summary of changes:
7c7d58c... perl-Devel-Timer: version 0.06 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
7c7d58c... perl-Devel-Timer: version 0.06 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
7c7d58c... perl-Devel-Timer: version 0.06 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
c510208... 0.11 bump (*)
095785a... 0.12 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hello all,
Just tested the latest opensmtpd snapshot opensmtpd-201410152136p1 with
libasr-201410012101.tar.gz on RHEL 5,6,7 and Fedora 20 and devel. Seems no
build issues so far, and basically working (I've send a couple of messages
via each testing instance not going deeply to test all the
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DBIx-RunSQL:
1fd98d555a36e85f7403f342a41b0282 DBIx-RunSQL-0.12.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 88dc05e460b32b4ac14beecdb9b24af1cb346b14
Author: Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com
Date: Sat Oct 11 22:14:07 2014 +0600
perl-DBIx-RunSQL: initial submission (#1141390)
.gitignore|1 +
perl-DBIx-RunSQL.spec | 82
Summary of changes:
88dc05e... perl-DBIx-RunSQL: initial submission (#1141390) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
88dc05e... perl-DBIx-RunSQL: initial submission (#1141390) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
88dc05e... perl-DBIx-RunSQL: initial submission (#1141390) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
88dc05e... perl-DBIx-RunSQL: initial submission (#1141390) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
88dc05e... perl-DBIx-RunSQL: initial submission (#1141390) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
88dc05e... perl-DBIx-RunSQL: initial submission (#1141390) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-enum:
e67f8d34a0104710dc50f38c958e90e9 enum-1.10.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 896a84674491aca71c7304057be464dd10da56d2
Author: Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com
Date: Sun Oct 12 00:45:00 2014 +0600
perl-enum: initial submission (#1141486)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-enum.spec | 67
sources
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Devel-Timer:
21b0e50193235b9d370514a17dd0e49f Devel-Timer-0.05.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
896a846... perl-enum: initial submission (#1141486) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
896a846... perl-enum: initial submission (#1141486) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
896a846... perl-enum: initial submission (#1141486) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 5977cd24ced6a111c53e7389f4f815ba7e497585
Author: Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com
Date: Sun Oct 12 01:00:27 2014 +0600
perl-Devel-Timer: initial submission (#1139041)
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Devel-Timer.spec | 79
Summary of changes:
896a846... perl-enum: initial submission (#1141486) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
896a846... perl-enum: initial submission (#1141486) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
896a846... perl-enum: initial submission (#1141486) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
5977cd2... perl-Devel-Timer: initial submission (#1139041) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
5977cd2... perl-Devel-Timer: initial submission (#1139041) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
5977cd2... perl-Devel-Timer: initial submission (#1139041) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
5977cd2... perl-Devel-Timer: initial submission (#1139041) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
5977cd2... perl-Devel-Timer: initial submission (#1139041) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
5977cd2... perl-Devel-Timer: initial submission (#1139041) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Array-Unique:
e3fc4333a97c360348b8c7d0b6b94e83 Array-Unique-0.08.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4b554ef2991b431f92a6b98de20c2f606b95f5d1
Author: Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com
Date: Thu Oct 2 20:35:59 2014 +0600
perl-Array-Unique: initial import (#1139043)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Array-Unique.spec | 75
sources
Summary of changes:
4b554ef... perl-Array-Unique: initial import (#1139043) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
4b554ef... perl-Array-Unique: initial import (#1139043) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
4b554ef... perl-Array-Unique: initial import (#1139043) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
4b554ef... perl-Array-Unique: initial import (#1139043) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
4b554ef... perl-Array-Unique: initial import (#1139043) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
4b554ef... perl-Array-Unique: initial import (#1139043) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit fe278c2eaf6b0c4b20d007d27887e9024833c8f5
Author: Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com
Date: Fri Sep 26 03:17:28 2014 +0600
perl-IO-Pipely: epel7 branch
perl-IO-Pipely.spec |9 +++--
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-IO-Pipely.spec b/perl-IO
commit b2c33acddb444f2f16692708675e56013e978d03
Author: Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com
Date: Sat Sep 20 05:01:47 2014 +0600
perl-Pod-Readme: version 0.11
.gitignore |1 +
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
Summary of changes:
03b1807... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*)
ff899e7... - rebuild against perl 5.10.1 (*)
2b98bc5... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*)
c95ef33... dist-git conversion (*)
e4ab985... - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with
commit e89c9d6669abcdbebb307ce93cf48cfca552c130
Merge: b2c33ac 678ea33
Author: Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com
Date: Sat Sep 20 05:16:43 2014 +0600
Merge branch 'master' into el6
perl-Pod-Readme.spec | 69 -
1 files changed, 56 insertions
commit 9108eb69da20a6324af480a7d5681d7406b25569
Author: Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com
Date: Sat Sep 20 06:30:18 2014 +0600
perl-Pod-Readme: version 0.11
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Pod-Readme.spec | 87 --
sources
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DBIx-Connector:
127fafe4fd4da0c9c7df2ff1c8754c6d DBIx-Connector-0.53.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit afe27d52607935cf3ed1946659f7b5d1d9667309
Author: Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com
Date: Wed Sep 17 00:53:57 2014 +0600
perl-DBIx-Connector: initial release (#1141389)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-DBIx-Connector.spec | 73
Summary of changes:
afe27d5... perl-DBIx-Connector: initial release (#1141389) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
afe27d5... perl-DBIx-Connector: initial release (#1141389) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
afe27d5... perl-DBIx-Connector: initial release (#1141389) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
afe27d5... perl-DBIx-Connector: initial release (#1141389) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Data-Faker:
48792a48730e5f8489e16fd970b413a5 Data-Faker-0.10.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit dab0d05e386362968104d58a089caedfb4573e5a
Author: Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com
Date: Fri Sep 12 06:31:40 2014 +0600
perl-Data-Faker: initial import (#1138971)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Data-Faker.spec | 65 ++
sources
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo